Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Workers' Compensation Board of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
J Occup Rehabil. 2024 Dec;34(4):793-802. doi: 10.1007/s10926-023-10165-9. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
To evaluate the effectiveness of telerehabilitation for promoting return-to-work (RTW) among injured workers.
We conducted a pragmatic, quasi-experimental study comparing telerehabilitation, in-person, or hybrid services. Descriptive statistics analyzed demographics, occupational factors, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Kruskal-Wallis tests investigated differences between mode of delivery and changes in PROM scores. Logistic and Cox-proportional hazard regression examined associations between mode of delivery and RTW status or days receiving wage replacement benefits in the first-year post-discharge, respectively, while controlling for potential confounders.
A slightly higher percentage of the 3,708 worker sample were male (52.8%). Mean (standard deviation (SD)) age across all delivery formats was 45.5 (12.5) years. Edmonton zone had the highest amount of telerehabilitation delivery (53.5%). The majority of workers had their program delivered in a hybrid format (54.1%) and returned to work (74.4%) at discharge. All PROMs showed improvement although differences across delivery formats were not clinically meaningful. Delivery via telerehabilitation had significantly lower odds of RTW at discharge (Odds Ratio: 0.82, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.70-0.97) and a significantly lower risk of experiencing suspension of wage replacement benefits in the first year following discharge (Hazard Ratio: 0.92, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.84-0.99). Associations were no longer significant when confounders were controlled for.
RTW outcomes were not statistically different across delivery formats, suggesting that telerehabilitation is a novel strategy that may improve equitable access and earlier engagement in occupational rehabilitation. Factors such as gender and geographic location should be considered when deciding on service delivery format.
评估远程康复在促进受伤工人重返工作岗位(RTW)方面的效果。
我们进行了一项实用的、准实验性研究,比较了远程康复、面对面或混合服务。描述性统计分析了人口统计学、职业因素和患者报告的结果测量(PROM)。Kruskal-Wallis 检验调查了交付模式之间的差异以及 PROM 评分的变化。Logistic 和 Cox 比例风险回归分别考察了交付模式与 RTW 状态或出院后第一年接受工资替代福利天数之间的关联,同时控制了潜在的混杂因素。
工人样本中略高比例(52.8%)为男性。所有交付格式的平均(标准差(SD))年龄为 45.5(12.5)岁。埃德蒙顿地区的远程康复交付量最高(53.5%)。大多数工人以混合格式(54.1%)接受了他们的方案,并在出院时重返工作岗位(74.4%)。所有 PROM 都显示出改善,尽管交付格式之间的差异没有临床意义。通过远程康复进行交付,在出院时 RTW 的可能性显著降低(优势比:0.82,95%置信区间:0.70-0.97),并且在出院后第一年经历工资替代福利暂停的风险显著降低(风险比:0.92,95%置信区间:0.84-0.99)。当控制混杂因素时,关联不再显著。
RTW 结果在交付格式之间没有统计学差异,表明远程康复是一种可能改善公平获得和更早参与职业康复的新策略。在决定服务交付格式时,应考虑性别和地理位置等因素。