Suppr超能文献

在心脏骤停后患者的目标温度管理期间,体感和视觉诱发电位能否预测神经功能预后?

Can somatosensory and visual evoked potentials predict neurological outcome during targeted temperature management in post cardiac arrest patients?

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2017 Oct;119:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.06.022. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

Abstract

PURPOSES

In cardiac arrest patients treated with targeted temperature management (TTM), it is not certain if somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and visual evoked potentials (VEPs) can predict neurological outcomes during TTM. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of SEPs and VEPs during TTM and after rewarming.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included comatose patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest and treated with TTM between March 2007 and July 2015. SEPs and VEPs were recorded during TTM and after rewarming in these patients. Neurological outcome was assessed at discharge by the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) Scale.

RESULTS

In total, 115 patients were included. A total of 175 SEPs and 150 VEPs were performed. Five SEPs during treated with TTM and nine SEPs after rewarming were excluded from outcome prediction by SEPs due to an indeterminable N20 response because of technical error. Using 80 SEPs and 85 VEPs during treated with TTM, absent SEPs yielded a sensitivity of 58% and a specificity of 100% for poor outcome (CPC 3-5), and absent VEPs predicted poor neurological outcome with a sensitivity of 44% and a specificity of 96%. The AUC of combination of SEPs and VEPs was superior to either test alone (0.788 for absent SEPs and 0.713 for absent VEPs compared with 0.838 for the combination). After rewarming, absent SEPs and absent VEPs predicted poor neurological outcome with a specificity of 100%. When SEPs and VEPs were combined, VEPs slightly increased the prognostic accuracy of SEPs alone. Although one patient with absent VEP during treated with TTM had a good neurological outcome, none of the patients with good neurological outcome had an absent VEP after rewarming.

CONCLUSION

Absent SEPs could predict poor neurological outcome during TTM as well as after rewarming. Absent VEPs may predict poor neurological outcome in both periods and VEPs may provide additional prognostic value in outcome prediction.

摘要

目的

在接受目标温度管理(TTM)治疗的心脏骤停患者中,体感诱发电位(SEPs)和视觉诱发电位(VEPs)是否能预测 TTM 期间的神经功能结局尚不确定。本研究旨在探讨 TTM 期间和复温后 SEPs 和 VEPs 的预后价值。

方法

本回顾性队列研究纳入了 2007 年 3 月至 2015 年 7 月期间接受 TTM 治疗的心脏骤停后昏迷患者。对这些患者在 TTM 期间和复温后进行 SEPs 和 VEPs 记录。通过脑功能预后评分(Cerebral Performance Category,CPC)量表在出院时评估神经功能结局。

结果

共纳入 115 例患者,共进行了 175 次 SEPs 和 150 次 VEPs 检查。由于技术错误导致无法确定 N20 反应,有 5 次 SEPs 在 TTM 期间和 9 次 SEPs 在复温后被排除在 SEPs 预后预测之外。使用 TTM 期间的 80 次 SEPs 和 85 次 VEPs,无 SEPs 对预后不良(CPC 3-5)的敏感性为 58%,特异性为 100%,无 VEP 预测神经功能不良的敏感性为 44%,特异性为 96%。SEPs 和 VEPs 联合的 AUC 优于任一单独的检查(无 SEPs 为 0.788,无 VEPs 为 0.713,联合检查为 0.838)。复温后,无 SEPs 和无 VEPs 对预后不良的特异性均为 100%。当 SEPs 和 VEPs 联合使用时,VEPs 略微提高了 SEPs 单独的预后准确性。尽管有 1 例患者在 TTM 期间 VEPs 缺失但神经功能结局良好,但无一例预后良好的患者在复温后 VEPs 缺失。

结论

无 SEPs 可预测 TTM 期间和复温后的不良神经功能结局。无 VEPs 可能预测两个时期的不良神经功能结局,VEPs 可能在预后预测中提供额外的预后价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验