Dupont Corinne, Winer Norbert, Rabilloud Muriel, Touzet Sandrine, Branger Bernard, Lansac Jacques, Gaucher Laurent, Duclos Antoine, Huissoud Cyril, Boutitie Florent, Rudigoz René-Charles, Colin Cyrille
Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, F-69004, Lyon, France; Health Services and Performance Research - HESPER EA 7425, F-69008, Lyon, France.
Service de gynécologie-obstétrique/maternité, Centre Hospitalo-universitaire de Nantes, F-44300, Nantes, France.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Aug;215:206-212. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.06.026. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
Suboptimal care contributes to perinatal morbidity and mortality. We investigated the effects of a multifaceted program designed to improve obstetric practices and outcomes.
A cluster-randomized trial was conducted from October 2008 to November 2010 in 95 French maternity units randomized either to receive an information intervention about published guidelines or left to apply them freely. The intervention combined an outreach visit with a morbidity/mortality conference (MMC) to review perinatal morbidity/mortality cases. Within the intervention group, the units were randomized to have MMCs with or without clinical psychologists. The primary outcome was the rate of suboptimal care among perinatal morbidity/mortality cases. The secondary outcomes included the rate of suboptimal care among cases of morbidity, the rate of suboptimal care among cases of mortality, the rate of avoidable morbidity and/or mortality cases, and the incidence of, morbidity and/or mortality. A mixed logistic regression model with random intercept was used to quantify the effect of the intervention on the main outcome.
The study reviewed 2459 cases of morbidity or mortality among 165,353 births. The rate of suboptimal care among morbidity plus mortality cases was not significantly lower in the intervention than in the control group (8.1% vs. 10.6%, OR [95% CI]: 0.75 [0.50-1.12], p=0.15. However, the cases of suboptimal care among morbidity cases were significantly lower in the intervention group (7.6% vs. 11.5%, 0.62 [0.40-0.94], p=0.02); the incidence of perinatal morbidity was also lower (7.0 vs. 8.1‰, p=0.01). No differences were found between psychologist-backed and the other units.
The intervention reduced the rate of suboptimal care mainly in morbidity cases and the incidence of morbidity but did not succeed in improving morbidity plus mortality combined. More clear-cut results regarding mortality require a longer study period and the inclusion of structures that intervene before and after the delivery room. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02584166).
医疗服务欠佳会导致围产期发病和死亡。我们调查了一项旨在改善产科医疗行为及结局的多方面项目的效果。
2008年10月至2010年11月,在95家法国产科单位进行了一项整群随机试验,这些单位被随机分为两组,一组接受关于已发布指南的信息干预,另一组则自由应用这些指南。干预措施包括一次外展访问和一次发病率/死亡率会议(MMC),以审查围产期发病/死亡病例。在干预组中,各单位被随机分为参加有或没有临床心理学家参与的MMC。主要结局是围产期发病/死亡病例中医疗服务欠佳的发生率。次要结局包括发病病例中医疗服务欠佳的发生率、死亡病例中医疗服务欠佳的发生率、可避免的发病和/或死亡病例的发生率以及发病和/或死亡的发生率。采用带有随机截距的混合逻辑回归模型来量化干预对主要结局的影响。
该研究审查了165353例分娩中的2459例发病或死亡病例。干预组中发病加死亡病例的医疗服务欠佳发生率并不显著低于对照组(8.1%对10.6%,比值比[95%置信区间]:0.75[0.50 - 1.12],p = 0.15)。然而,干预组中发病病例的医疗服务欠佳情况显著较少(7.6%对11.5%,0.62[0.40 - 0.94],p = 0.02);围产期发病率也较低(7.0对8.1‰,p = 0.01)。在有心理学家支持的单位和其他单位之间未发现差异。
该干预主要降低了发病病例中医疗服务欠佳的发生率以及发病率,但未能成功改善发病加死亡的综合情况。关于死亡率的更明确结果需要更长的研究期,并纳入在产房前后进行干预的机构。(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02584166)