• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于结肠镜检查的改良肠道准备方案,兼顾患者满意度与便利性。

A Modified Bowel Preparation Regimen for Colonoscopy Providing the Patients' Satisfaction and Convenience.

作者信息

Wen Chia-Cheng, Jao Shu-Wen, Hsiao Cheng-Wen

机构信息

Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2017 Jun 26;23:3123-3129. doi: 10.12659/msm.905431.

DOI:10.12659/msm.905431
PMID:28649124
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5498127/
Abstract

BACKGROUND A complete cleansing of the bowel is a critical factor that impacts the diagnostic accuracy of colonoscopies. However, the common bowel preparation regimen of two 45 mL doses of sodium phosphate (2×NaP) often leads to uncomfortable symptoms and subsequently lower patient adherence. To improve patient adherence and satisfaction, we proposed a modified regimen composed of two sennoside tablets and one bottle of NaP (S+NaP) and we then evaluated bowel preparation quality and patient satisfaction. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 531 patients who underwent colonoscopies at the outpatient coloproctology clinic from January 2016 to December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Eligible patients were divided into two groups: S+NaP group (n=93) and 2×NaP group (n=60). We compared bowel preparation quality, adenoma detection rate (ADR), self-reported patient satisfaction scores, and adverse events among the two groups. RESULTS Regarding high bowel preparation quality, our results showed that there was no significant difference among the two groups (p=0.775), as well as no significant differences in ADRs (p=0.187). However, a lower proportion of nausea was found in the S+NaP group compared to the 2×NaP group (24.7% versus 41.7%, respectively, p=0.028). In addition, patients in the S+NaP group were more likely to be very satisfied with the regimen compared with patients in the 2×NaP group (odds ratio: 5.58; 95% confidence interval: 2.36-13.213, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our modified bowel preparation regimen, S+NaP, yielded significantly higher patient satisfaction with less nausea while maintaining similar bowel preparation quality.

摘要

背景 肠道的彻底清洁是影响结肠镜检查诊断准确性的关键因素。然而,常用的45毫升两剂磷酸钠(2×NaP)肠道准备方案常常会导致不适症状,进而降低患者的依从性。为了提高患者的依从性和满意度,我们提出了一种改良方案,即两片番泻苷片加一瓶NaP(S+NaP),然后我们评估了肠道准备质量和患者满意度。

材料与方法 回顾性分析了2016年1月至2016年12月在门诊结肠直肠科接受结肠镜检查的531例患者。符合条件的患者分为两组:S+NaP组(n=93)和2×NaP组(n=60)。我们比较了两组的肠道准备质量、腺瘤检出率(ADR)、患者自我报告的满意度评分以及不良事件。

结果 关于高质量的肠道准备,我们的结果显示两组之间没有显著差异(p=0.775),ADR也没有显著差异(p=0.187)。然而,与2×NaP组相比,S+NaP组恶心的比例较低(分别为24.7%和41.7%,p=0.028)。此外,与2×NaP组的患者相比,S+NaP组的患者对该方案更有可能非常满意(优势比:5.58;95%置信区间:2.36-13.213,p<)。

结论 我们改良的肠道准备方案S+NaP在保持相似肠道准备质量的同时,患者满意度显著更高,恶心症状更少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ad7/5498127/5087744405ab/medscimonit-23-3123-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ad7/5498127/5087744405ab/medscimonit-23-3123-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ad7/5498127/5087744405ab/medscimonit-23-3123-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A Modified Bowel Preparation Regimen for Colonoscopy Providing the Patients' Satisfaction and Convenience.一种用于结肠镜检查的改良肠道准备方案,兼顾患者满意度与便利性。
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Jun 26;23:3123-3129. doi: 10.12659/msm.905431.
2
Phosphate tablets or polyethylene glycol for preparation to colonoscopy? A multicentre non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.磷酸片剂还是聚乙二醇用于结肠镜检查准备?一项多中心非劣效性随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2017 May;31(5):2166-2173. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5214-1. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
3
Randomized controlled trial of sodium phosphate tablets vs polyethylene glycol solution for colonoscopy bowel cleansing.磷酸钠片与聚乙二醇溶液用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的随机对照试验
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 14;20(42):15845-51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15845.
4
Randomized, controlled trial of 2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate components versus sodium phosphate for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy for cancer screening.2升聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸成分与磷酸钠用于癌症筛查结肠镜检查前肠道准备的随机对照试验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Dec;30(12):2493-503. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.960513. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
5
Two liters of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution versus sodium phosphate as bowel cleansing regimen for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.两升聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液与磷酸钠作为结肠镜检查肠道清洁方案的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Endoscopy. 2002 Jul;34(7):560-3. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33207.
6
Prospective randomized comparison of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol lavage for colonoscopy preparation.口服磷酸钠与聚乙二醇灌洗用于结肠镜检查准备的前瞻性随机对照研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Dec 21;11(47):7486-93. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i47.7486.
7
High-dose bisacodyl plus water lavage compared with oral sodium phosphate as bowel preparation for outpatient colonoscopy.高剂量比沙可啶加水灌洗与口服磷酸钠作为门诊结肠镜检查肠道准备的比较。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2009 Aug;72(8):402-7. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70396-X.
8
A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy (HSG-01*).一项比较三种用于结肠镜检查的肠道清洁溶液(HSG - 01*)安全性和有效性的随机、双盲、前瞻性试验。
Endoscopy. 2003 Apr;35(4):300-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-38150.
9
Preparation before colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial comparing different regimes.结肠镜检查前准备:不同方案的随机对照试验
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Oct;23(10):897-902. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834a3444.
10
Colon cleansing with oral sodium phosphate in adolescents: dose, efficacy, acceptability, and safety.青少年口服磷酸钠进行结肠清洗:剂量、疗效、可接受性及安全性
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jun;103(6):1533-9; quiz 1540. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01806.x. Epub 2008 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Using a Mobile Health App (ColonClean) to Enhance the Effectiveness of Bowel Preparation: Development and Usability Study.使用移动健康应用程序(ColonClean)提高肠道准备效果:开发与可用性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Jan 8;12:e58479. doi: 10.2196/58479.
2
Factors predicting improved compliance towards colonoscopy in individuals with positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT).预测粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)阳性个体对结肠镜检查依从性提高的因素。
Cancer Med. 2021 Nov;10(21):7735-7746. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4275. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
3
Educational Video Followed by Retelling Bowel Preparation Process to Improve Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation Quality: A Prospective Nursing Intervention Study.

本文引用的文献

1
How Efficacious Are Patient Education Interventions to Improve Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy? A Systematic Review.患者教育干预措施对改善结肠镜检查肠道准备的效果如何?一项系统评价。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 14;11(10):e0164442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164442. eCollection 2016.
2
Impact of Single- vs. Split-Dose Low-Volume Bowel Preparations on Bowel Movement Kinetics, Patient Inconvenience, and Polyp Detection: A Prospective Trial.单剂量与分剂量低容量肠道准备对排便动力学、患者不便程度及息肉检测的影响:一项前瞻性试验
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Sep;111(9):1330-7. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.273. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
3
Review of efficacy and safety of laxatives use in geriatrics.
教育视频结合复述肠道准备过程对提高结肠镜肠道准备质量的影响:一项前瞻性护理干预研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Aug 30;24:6029-6037. doi: 10.12659/MSM.909572.
老年患者使用泻药的疗效与安全性综述。
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2016 May 6;7(2):334-42. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i2.334.
4
How We Cleaned It Up: A Simple Method That Improved Our Practice's Bowel Prep.我们是如何清理它的:一种改进我们诊所肠道准备工作的简单方法。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Aug;111(8):1079-81. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.148. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
5
[Comparative Study on Bowel Preparation Efficacy of Ascorbic Acid Containing Polyethylene Glycol by Adding Either Simethicone or 1 L of Water in Health Medical Examination Patients: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study].[在健康体检患者中添加西甲硅油或1升水的含抗坏血酸聚乙二醇肠道准备效果的比较研究:一项前瞻性随机对照研究]
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr 25;67(4):189-97. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2016.67.4.189.
6
High-quality Bowel Preparation Is Required for Detection of Sessile Serrated Polyps.检测无蒂锯齿状息肉需要高质量的肠道准备。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Aug;14(8):1155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.03.044. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
7
Bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: Balancing efficacy, safety, cost and patient tolerance.结肠镜检查前的肠道准备:平衡疗效、安全性、成本和患者耐受性。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jan 10;8(1):4-12. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i1.4.
8
Sodium phosphate versus polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy bowel preparation: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.结肠镜检查肠道准备中磷酸钠与聚乙二醇的比较:随机对照试验的最新荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):4033-41. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4716-6. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
9
Split-Dose Preparations Are Superior to Day-Before Bowel Cleansing Regimens: A Meta-analysis.分剂量制剂优于前一天肠道准备方案:一项荟萃分析。
Gastroenterology. 2015 Jul;149(1):79-88. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
10
Bowel preparation before colonoscopy.结肠镜检查前的肠道准备。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Apr;81(4):781-94. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.048. Epub 2015 Jan 14.