• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结肠镜检查前准备:不同方案的随机对照试验

Preparation before colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial comparing different regimes.

机构信息

Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Atrium Medical Center Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Oct;23(10):897-902. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834a3444.

DOI:10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834a3444
PMID:21900786
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

A good bowel preparation is essential for optimal visualization of the large intestine. Several preparations with a difference in composition and volume are available. We compared five methods for bowel cleansing quality and patients' acceptability.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adult ambulatory outpatients scheduled for elective colonoscopy were randomized to receive 4-l polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution (Klean-prep), 2-l PEG solution+ascorbic acid (Moviprep), or a sodium phosphate (NaP) solution, Phosphoral. Patients with the PEG solutions were also randomized to receive simethicone (Aeropax), to investigate whether this improves the bowel cleansing efficacy. Before colonoscopy patients completed a questionnaire about the acceptability and tolerability of the preparation. Endoscopists blinded to the type of preparation gave a bowel cleansing score.

RESULTS

Data were available for 461 patients. 2-l PEG+ascorbic acid was noninferior to 4-l PEG in bowel cleansing quality of rectosigmoid and colon. NaP was noninferior to 4-l PEG in bowel cleansing quality of rectosigmoid but inferior for the whole colon. Compliance was significantly less in the group with 4-l PEG compared with the 2-l PEG and NaP group. No difference was found for abdominal cramps. Taste was significantly better in the 2-l PEG group. Simethicone did not improve the bowel cleansing quality.

CONCLUSION

2-l PEG+ascorbic acid was noninferior to the 4-l PEG solution in bowel cleansing quality and was better in taste and compliance. NaP was inferior to 4-l PEG in bowel cleansing quality. Addition of simethicone gave no improvement.

摘要

背景与目的

良好的肠道准备对于优化大肠可视化至关重要。有多种组成和容量不同的制剂可供选择。我们比较了五种肠道清洁质量和患者接受度的方法。

患者和方法

择期行结肠镜检查的成年门诊患者被随机分为接受 4 升聚乙二醇(PEG)溶液(Klean-prep)、2 升 PEG 溶液+抗坏血酸(Moviprep)或磷酸钠(NaP)溶液(Phosphoral)。接受 PEG 溶液的患者也被随机分为接受二甲硅油(Aeropax)组,以研究是否可以提高肠道清洁效果。在结肠镜检查前,患者完成了一份关于准备工作的可接受性和耐受性的问卷。内镜医师对制剂类型进行了盲法评估,并给出了肠道清洁评分。

结果

共有 461 名患者的数据可用。2 升 PEG+抗坏血酸在直肠乙状结肠和结肠的肠道清洁质量方面不劣于 4 升 PEG。NaP 在直肠乙状结肠的肠道清洁质量方面不劣于 4 升 PEG,但在整个结肠方面较差。与 2 升 PEG 和 NaP 组相比,4 升 PEG 组的依从性显著降低。腹部痉挛无差异。2 升 PEG 组的口感明显更好。二甲硅油并未改善肠道清洁质量。

结论

2 升 PEG+抗坏血酸在肠道清洁质量方面不劣于 4 升 PEG 溶液,且在口感和依从性方面更好。NaP 在肠道清洁质量方面劣于 4 升 PEG。添加二甲硅油并没有改善效果。

相似文献

1
Preparation before colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial comparing different regimes.结肠镜检查前准备:不同方案的随机对照试验
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Oct;23(10):897-902. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834a3444.
2
Two liters of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution versus sodium phosphate as bowel cleansing regimen for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.两升聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液与磷酸钠作为结肠镜检查肠道清洁方案的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Endoscopy. 2002 Jul;34(7):560-3. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33207.
3
Administration of olive oil followed by a low volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution improves patient satisfaction with right-side colonic cleansing over administration of the conventional volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation.相较于使用常规剂量的聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液进行结肠镜检查准备,先给予橄榄油再给予少量聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液可提高患者对右侧结肠清洁的满意度。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Sep;70(3):515-21. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
4
Colonic lavage with two polyethylene glycol solutions prior to colonoscopy makes no difference: a prospective randomized controlled trial.结肠镜检查前使用两种聚乙二醇溶液进行结肠灌洗并无差异:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(5):622-6. doi: 10.1080/00365520701843001.
5
A new low-volume isosmotic polyethylene glycol solution plus bisacodyl versus split-dose 4 L polyethylene glycol for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial.一种新的低容量等渗聚乙二醇溶液加比沙可啶与 4 L 聚乙二醇分剂量用于结肠镜检查前肠道准备的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Dig Liver Dis. 2013 Jan;45(1):23-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2012.07.011. Epub 2012 Aug 21.
6
2 L PEG plus ascorbic acid versus 4 L PEG plus simethicon for colonoscopy preparation: a randomized single-blind clinical trial.2升聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸与4升聚乙二醇加西甲硅油用于结肠镜检查准备:一项随机单盲临床试验
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Jun;23(3):276-80. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31828e389d.
7
Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy.低容量聚乙二醇溶液与标准聚乙二醇加电解质用于结肠镜检查前肠道准备的随机试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Apr;103(4):883-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01708.x. Epub 2008 Jan 11.
8
Randomised clinical trial: low-volume bowel preparation for colonoscopy - a comparison between two different PEG-based formulations.随机临床试验:结肠镜检查用低容量肠道准备 - 两种不同 PEG 制剂的比较。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Oct;36(8):717-24. doi: 10.1111/apt.12026. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
9
A dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser administered the day before colonoscopy: results from the SEE CLEAR II study.结肠镜检查前一天给予的双效、低容量肠道清洁剂:SEE CLEAR II 研究结果。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar;108(3):401-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.441. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
10
High-dose senna compared with conventional PEG-ES lavage as bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded trial.大剂量番泻叶与传统聚乙二醇电解质溶液灌洗用于择期结肠镜检查肠道准备的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、研究者设盲试验
Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Dec;100(12):2674-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00335.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Low Volume Versus Conventional Volume of Polyethylene Glycol for Bowel Preparation during Colonoscopy: A Randomised Controlled Trial.结肠镜检查期间低容量与常规容量聚乙二醇用于肠道准备的比较:一项随机对照试验
Malays J Med Sci. 2023 Oct;30(5):106-115. doi: 10.21315/mjms2023.30.5.9. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
2
The safety and effects of high- and low-volume polyethylene glycol bowel preparation methods before colonoscopy on bowel cleanliness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.结肠镜检查前高容量和低容量聚乙二醇肠道准备方法对肠道清洁度的安全性及效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Aug 31;14(4):1759-1769. doi: 10.21037/jgo-23-581. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
3
Electrolyte disturbances after bowel preparation for colonoscopy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
结肠镜检查前肠道准备后电解质紊乱:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Endosc. 2022 Jul;34(5):913-926. doi: 10.1111/den.14237. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
4
Effect of antifoaming agent on benign colorectal tumors in colonoscopy: A meta-analysis.消泡剂在结肠镜检查中对良性结直肠肿瘤的影响:一项荟萃分析。
World J Clin Cases. 2021 May 26;9(15):3607-3622. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i15.3607.
5
Comparison of patterns of laxative ingestion to improve bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a pilot randomized clinical trial.比较用于改善结肠镜检查肠道准备的泻药服用模式:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Endosc Int Open. 2020 May;8(5):E617-E622. doi: 10.1055/a-1118-3526. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
6
A low-residue diet before colonoscopy tends to improve tolerability by patients with no differences in preparation quality: a randomized trial.结肠镜检查前的低残留饮食往往可以提高患者的耐受性,而不影响准备质量:一项随机试验。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):3037-3042. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07100-6. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
7
Predictors and colonoscopy outcomes of inadequate bowel cleansing: a 10-year experience in 28,725 patients.肠道准备不充分的预测因素及结肠镜检查结果:28725例患者的10年经验
Ann Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep-Oct;32(5):457-462. doi: 10.20524/aog.2019.0400. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
8
Low-Volume Polyethylene Glycol Improved Patient Attendance in Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis.小剂量聚乙二醇改善结肠镜检查前肠道准备的患者依从性:一项采用序贯试验分析的荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 May 6;6:92. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00092. eCollection 2019.
9
Comparative efficacy of low volume versus traditional standard volume PEG on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: Protocol for an updated meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.低容量聚乙二醇与传统标准容量聚乙二醇在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的比较疗效:一项采用序贯试验分析的更新荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Apr;97(17):e0599. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010599.
10
A head-to-head comparison of 4-L polyethylene glycol and low-volume solutions before colonoscopy: which is the best? A multicentre, randomized trial.结肠镜检查前4升聚乙二醇与小容量溶液的直接比较:哪种最佳?一项多中心随机试验。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Dec;32(12):1763-1766. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2901-x. Epub 2017 Sep 24.