• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架置入后临床再狭窄及其预测因素:GABI-R 研究结果。

Clinical restenosis and its predictors after implantation of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: results from GABI-R.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Munich University Clinic, LMU, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2017 Dec 20;13(11):1319-1326. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00291.

DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00291
PMID:28649953
Abstract

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess clinical restenosis and its predictors after implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) in everyday practice in the large-scale German-Austrian ABSORB Registry (GABI-R).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between November 2013 and January 2016, 3,264 patients underwent BVS implantation in the 93 centres of GABI-R. At six-month follow-up, 24 patients experienced clinically indicated target lesion revascularisation (cTLR) unrelated to BVS thrombosis (cumulative incidence 0.76%; angiographically, 58.3% of in-BVS restenosis of focal pattern). Compared to patients without cTLR, patients with cTLR had more lesions per patient (1.83±1.0 vs. 1.36±0.7), complex (52.3% vs. 36.2%) and mild-to-moderately calcified lesions (65.9% vs. 60.5%) treated, and more frequently had overlapping BVS (22.2% vs. 10.8%), all p<0.05. Implanted BVS length was 40.0 mm (28.0, 46.9) vs. 23.0 mm (18.0, 30.0), p<0.001, remaining in the multivariable analysis the only independent predictor of cTLR (hazard ratio 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04, p<0.001). The myocardial infarction rate was also significantly higher among patients with cTLR, 29.2% vs. 1.7%, p<0.0001.

CONCLUSIONS

cTLR related to BVS restenosis at six months after BVS implantation is a rare event depending on implanted BVS length. Whether cTLR increases the myocardial infarction risk needs to be evaluated at longer-term follow-up and within the setting of adequately powered randomised trials.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在德国-奥地利 ABSORB 注册研究(GABI-R)的大型临床实践中,生物可吸收血管支架(BVS)植入后的临床再狭窄及其预测因素。

方法和结果

2013 年 11 月至 2016 年 1 月,3264 例患者在 GABI-R 的 93 个中心接受了 BVS 植入术。在 6 个月的随访中,24 例患者发生了与 BVS 血栓无关的临床指征性靶病变血运重建(cTLR)(累积发生率 0.76%;血管造影显示,58.3%的在 BVS 内再狭窄呈局灶性模式)。与未发生 cTLR 的患者相比,发生 cTLR 的患者每例患者的病变数量更多(1.83±1.0 对 1.36±0.7),复杂病变(52.3%对 36.2%)和轻度至中度钙化病变(65.9%对 60.5%)更多,并且 BVS 重叠的发生率更高(22.2%对 10.8%),所有差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。植入的 BVS 长度为 40.0mm(28.0,46.9)对 23.0mm(18.0,30.0),P<0.001,在多变量分析中,是 cTLR 的唯一独立预测因素(风险比 1.02,95%CI:1.01-1.04,P<0.001)。cTLR 组心肌梗死发生率也明显高于未发生 cTLR 组(29.2%对 1.7%),P<0.0001。

结论

BVS 植入后 6 个月时与 BVS 再狭窄相关的 cTLR 是一种罕见事件,取决于植入的 BVS 长度。cTLR 是否会增加心肌梗死风险,需要在更长时间的随访中,并在经过充分功率的随机试验中进行评估。

相似文献

1
Clinical restenosis and its predictors after implantation of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: results from GABI-R.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架置入后临床再狭窄及其预测因素:GABI-R 研究结果。
EuroIntervention. 2017 Dec 20;13(11):1319-1326. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00291.
2
Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds in patients with coronary artery disease: results from the German-Austrian ABSORB RegIstRy (GABI-R).载依维莫司的生物可吸收支架治疗冠状动脉疾病患者:德国-奥地利 ABSORB 注册研究(GABI-R)的结果。
EuroIntervention. 2017 Dec 20;13(11):1311-1318. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00330.
3
Clinical results of bioresorbable drug-eluting scaffolds in short and long coronary artery lesions using the PSP technique.应用 PSP 技术治疗短和长冠状动脉病变的生物可吸收药物洗脱支架的临床结果。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Jan 18;19(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0994-y.
4
Bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting stents or drug eluting balloon for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: 1-Year follow-up of a propensity score matching comparison (the BIORESOLVE-ISR Study).生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱支架或药物洗脱球囊治疗冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的比较:倾向性评分匹配比较的 1 年随访(BIORESOLVE-ISR 研究)。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct 1;92(4):668-677. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27473. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
5
Clinical results of single and multiple bioresorbable drug-eluting scaffolds for treatment of de-novo coronary artery disease.单生物可吸收药物洗脱支架和多生物可吸收药物洗脱支架治疗初发冠状动脉疾病的临床结果
Coron Artery Dis. 2016 Nov;27(7):561-5. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000392.
6
Bioresorbable Everolimus-Eluting Vascular Scaffold for Long Coronary Lesions: A Subanalysis of the International, Multicenter GHOST-EU Registry.生物可吸收依维莫司洗脱血管支架治疗长段冠状动脉病变:国际多中心 GHOST-EU 注册研究的亚组分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Mar 27;10(6):560-568. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.12.013. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
7
Long-Term Results of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis: The RIBS VI Study.生物可吸收血管支架治疗支架内再狭窄患者的长期结果:RIBS VI 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Aug 12;17(15):1825-1836. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.05.038.
8
Incidence and short-term clinical outcomes of small side branch occlusion after implantation of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: an interim report of 435 patients in the ABSORB-EXTEND single-arm trial in comparison with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent in the SPIRIT first and II trials.在 ABSORB-EXTEND 单臂试验中,435 例患者接受依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架治疗后小分支闭塞的发生率及短期临床结局:与 SPIRIT 试验 I 和 II 中依维莫司洗脱金属支架的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Mar;6(3):247-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.013.
9
Midterm clinical outcomes with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents for percutaneous coronary interventions: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架的中期临床结局:随机试验的荟萃分析。
EuroIntervention. 2018 Jan 20;13(13):1565-1573. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00492.
10
Mid- to Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Patients Treated With the Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold: The BVS Expand Registry.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架治疗患者的中期至长期临床结局:BVS Expand 注册研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Aug 22;9(16):1652-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.035. Epub 2016 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Five Years Outcomes and Predictors of Events in a Single-Center Cohort of Patients Treated with Bioresorbable Coronary Vascular Scaffolds.单中心生物可吸收冠状动脉支架治疗患者队列的五年结局及事件预测因素
J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 20;9(3):847. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030847.
2
Hybrid Coronary Percutaneous Treatment with Metallic Stents and Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds: 2-years Results from the GABI-R Registry.金属支架与依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架的混合冠状动脉经皮治疗:来自GABI-R注册研究的2年结果
J Clin Med. 2019 May 30;8(6):767. doi: 10.3390/jcm8060767.