• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用 PSP 技术治疗短和长冠状动脉病变的生物可吸收药物洗脱支架的临床结果。

Clinical results of bioresorbable drug-eluting scaffolds in short and long coronary artery lesions using the PSP technique.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Head Interventional Cardiology Research Group, University Hospital of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee, 23 89081, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Jan 18;19(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0994-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12872-018-0994-y
PMID:30658574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6339442/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data on bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) for the treatment of long lesions are limited. We studied the use of BVS-Absorb in routine clinical practice and compared the outcome of long lesions with short lesions. Implantation of drug-eluting scaffolds without PSP-technique (predilation, proper sizing and postdilation) is associated with an increased thrombotic risk. We compared the long-term outcome up to 36 months of patients with short (< 20 mm) and long (≥20 mm) coronary artery lesions after implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) via PSP-technique.

METHODS

Three hundred twenty-six patients with 424 lesions were enrolled in this prospective study and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with the Absorb BVS. Clinical follow-up was scheduled after 12, 24 and 36 months. In all lesions the PSP-technique was used. The device oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) was defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) not clearly related to a non-target vessel and target lesion revascularization (TLR).

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier estimates for DOCE after 12 months were 2.63% for short lesions and 8.09% for long lesions (p = 0.0131), 5.51% vs. 11.35% (p = 0.0503) after 24 months and 8.00% vs. 18.00% (p = 0.0264) after 36 months of clinical follow-up. Kaplan-Meier estimates for TLR after 12 months were 1.46% for short and 7.69% for long lesions (p = 0.0012), 2.06% vs. 8.75% after 24 months (p = 0.0027) and 4.96% vs. 9.59% after 36 months of follow-up (p = 0.0109). Scaffold thrombosis rates were low.

CONCLUSIONS

In long lesions compared to short ones the bioresorbable scaffold Absorb implanted with the proper PSP technique Absorb has significant higher rates of DOCE.

THE LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Is 3 (non-random sample).

摘要

背景

生物可吸收血管支架(BVS)治疗长病变的数据有限。我们研究了在常规临床实践中使用 Absorb BVS-Absorb,并比较了长病变和短病变的结果。不使用 PSP 技术(预扩张、适当的支架尺寸和后扩张)植入药物洗脱支架与血栓形成风险增加相关。我们比较了通过 PSP 技术植入生物可吸收血管支架(BVS)后,短(<20mm)和长(≥20mm)冠状动脉病变患者的 36 个月长期结果。

方法

这项前瞻性研究共纳入 326 例 424 处病变患者,接受 Absorb BVS 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。临床随访时间分别为 12、24 和 36 个月。所有病变均采用 PSP 技术。定义设备定向复合终点(DOCE)为心脏死亡、与非靶血管无关的心肌梗死(MI)和靶病变血运重建(TLR)。

结果

12 个月时,短病变的 DOCE 估计值为 2.63%,长病变为 8.09%(p=0.0131);24 个月时,短病变和长病变的 DOCE 分别为 5.51%和 11.35%(p=0.0503),36 个月时分别为 8.00%和 18.00%(p=0.0264)。12 个月时,短病变和长病变的 TLR 估计值分别为 1.46%和 7.69%(p=0.0012);24 个月时,短病变和长病变的 TLR 分别为 2.06%和 8.75%(p=0.0027);36 个月时,短病变和长病变的 TLR 分别为 4.96%和 9.59%(p=0.0109)。支架血栓形成率较低。

结论

与短病变相比,在长病变中,采用适当的 PSP 技术植入的生物可吸收支架 Absorb 具有更高的 DOCE 发生率。

证据水平

3 级(非随机样本)。

相似文献

1
Clinical results of bioresorbable drug-eluting scaffolds in short and long coronary artery lesions using the PSP technique.应用 PSP 技术治疗短和长冠状动脉病变的生物可吸收药物洗脱支架的临床结果。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Jan 18;19(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0994-y.
2
Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds in patients with coronary artery disease: results from the German-Austrian ABSORB RegIstRy (GABI-R).载依维莫司的生物可吸收支架治疗冠状动脉疾病患者:德国-奥地利 ABSORB 注册研究(GABI-R)的结果。
EuroIntervention. 2017 Dec 20;13(11):1311-1318. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00330.
3
Clinical restenosis and its predictors after implantation of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: results from GABI-R.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架置入后临床再狭窄及其预测因素:GABI-R 研究结果。
EuroIntervention. 2017 Dec 20;13(11):1319-1326. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00291.
4
Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.长期疗效和安全性的依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架:随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;10(5). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005286.
5
Bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting stents or drug eluting balloon for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: 1-Year follow-up of a propensity score matching comparison (the BIORESOLVE-ISR Study).生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱支架或药物洗脱球囊治疗冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的比较:倾向性评分匹配比较的 1 年随访(BIORESOLVE-ISR 研究)。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct 1;92(4):668-677. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27473. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
6
Bioresorbable Everolimus-Eluting Vascular Scaffold for Long Coronary Lesions: A Subanalysis of the International, Multicenter GHOST-EU Registry.生物可吸收依维莫司洗脱血管支架治疗长段冠状动脉病变:国际多中心 GHOST-EU 注册研究的亚组分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Mar 27;10(6):560-568. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.12.013. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
7
Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting metallic stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 1-year results of a propensity score matching comparison: the BVS-EXAMINATION Study (bioresorbable vascular scaffold-a clinical evaluation of everolimus eluting coronary stents in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction).生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死:倾向评分匹配比较的 1 年结果:BVS-EXAMINATION 研究(生物可吸收血管支架——依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床评估)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan;8(1 Pt B):189-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.10.005.
8
The Impact of Post-Procedural Asymmetry, Expansion, and Eccentricity of Bioresorbable Everolimus-Eluting Scaffold and Metallic Everolimus-Eluting Stent on Clinical Outcomes in the ABSORB II Trial.在 ABSORB II 试验中,生物可吸收依维莫司洗脱支架和金属依维莫司洗脱支架的术后对称性、扩张和偏心对临床结果的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun 27;9(12):1231-1242. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.03.027. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
9
Mid- to Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Patients Treated With the Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold: The BVS Expand Registry.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架治疗患者的中期至长期临床结局:BVS Expand 注册研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Aug 22;9(16):1652-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.035. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
10
Long-Term Outcomes of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs. Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent - A Randomized Comparison Through 5 Years in Japan.在日本通过 5 年的随机比较,可吸收生物可降解血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架的长期结果。
Circ J. 2020 Apr 24;84(5):733-741. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-1184. Epub 2020 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Bioresorbable scaffolds advances, challenges, and future directions.生物可吸收支架的进展、挑战及未来方向。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Apr 22;87(7):4173-4183. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003424. eCollection 2025 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Resolute zotarolimus-eluting and Xience everolimus-eluting stents in patients with de novo long coronary artery lesions: a randomized LONG-DES VI trial.雷帕霉素洗脱支架与依维莫司洗脱支架治疗初发长冠状动脉病变患者的比较:一项随机LONG-DES VI试验
Coron Artery Dis. 2019 Jan;30(1):59-66. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000680.
2
Three-year clinical outcomes of patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Final results of the ABSORB EXTEND trial.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架治疗患者 3 年的临床结果:ABSORB EXTEND 试验的最终结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan 1;93(1):E1-E7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27715. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
3
Predictors of bioresorbable scaffold failure in STEMI patients at 3 years follow-up.
预测 STEMI 患者 3 年随访时生物可吸收支架失败的因素。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Oct 1;268:68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.04.081.
4
Long-term follow-up of BVS from a prospective multicenter registry: Impact of a dedicated implantation technique on clinical outcomes.前瞻性多中心注册研究的 BVS 长期随访:专用植入技术对临床结果的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 1;270:113-117. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.094. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
5
Longer Inflation Duration and Predilation-Sizing-Postdilation Improve Bioresorbable Scaffold Outcomes in a Long-term All-Comers Canadian Registry.长期的通胀持续时间和预扩张-扩张后测量大小可改善加拿大长期所有患者注册研究中生物可吸收支架的结果。
Can J Cardiol. 2018 Jun;34(6):752-758. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.02.030. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
6
Everolimus drug-eluting stent performance in patients with long coronary lesions: The multicenter Longprime registry.依维莫司药物洗脱支架在长病变患者中的应用:多中心 Longprime 注册研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec 1;92(7):E493-E501. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27657. Epub 2018 May 18.
7
Three-years outcomes of diabetic patients treated with coronary bioresorbable scaffolds.接受冠状动脉生物可吸收支架治疗的糖尿病患者的三年随访结果
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 May 10;18(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0811-7.
8
Predictors of early scaffold thrombosis: results from the multicenter prospective German-Austrian ABSORB RegIstRy.早期支架内血栓形成的预测因素:来自多中心前瞻性德国-奥地利ABSORB注册研究的结果
Coron Artery Dis. 2018 Aug;29(5):389-396. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000618.
9
Bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffold for patients presenting with non STelevation-acute coronary syndrome: A three-years follow-up1.用于非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的生物可吸收依维莫司洗脱血管支架:三年随访1
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2018;69(1-2):3-8. doi: 10.3233/CH-189101.
10
Characteristics, Predictors, and Mechanisms of Thrombosis in Coronary Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Differences Between Early and Late Events.冠状动脉生物可吸收支架内血栓形成的特征、预测因素和机制:早期和晚期事件的差异。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 11;10(23):2363-2371. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.020.