Suppr超能文献

中国南方地区Elecsys HIV联合检测法应用的回顾性分析

A retrospective analysis of the application of the Elecsys HIV combi PT assay in southern China.

作者信息

Liang Shaocong, Deng Guihua, Zhou Shaosong, Zeng Jing, Tan Weiqing, Yuan Xiaopeng

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, GuangZhou, GuangDong, China.

出版信息

J Clin Lab Anal. 2018 Mar;32(3). doi: 10.1002/jcla.22287. Epub 2017 Jun 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fourth-generation HIV assays have been implemented worldwide as a screening test for many years. Understanding the performance of fourth-generation assay in low HIV prevalence region is pivotal to interpret the test result correctly. In this study, retrospective analysis was used to evaluate application of the Elecsys HIV combi PT assay.

METHODS

A total of 85 043 specimens from a low prevalence setting were detected between June 2013 and October 2015. We evaluated the false-positive rate (FPR), specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV).

RESULTS

The specificity between male and female were 99.85% and 99.82%, respectively. The PPV on male (50.75%) was higher than female (17.05%) significantly, while the FPR was 0.15% and 0.18%. The gap between false-positive (median: 1.83, [IQR]: 1.30, 3.38) and confirmed-positive (median: 407.5, [IQR]: 184.2, 871.7) is enormous. The highest s/co ratio for false-positive cases was 85.45, while the lowest s/co ratio for confirmed-positive cases was 59.68. Various reasons were attributed to false-positive cases.

CONCLUSION

Optimal cutoff value is needed to be set to reduce the false-positive cases and predict the final status of HIV infection reliably. Retrospective analysis will help us to understand more about diagnosis of HIV.

摘要

背景

多年来,第四代HIV检测试剂已在全球范围内用作筛查测试。了解第四代检测试剂在HIV低流行地区的性能对于正确解读检测结果至关重要。在本研究中,采用回顾性分析来评估电化学发光免疫分析法检测HIV组合抗原抗体(Elecsys HIV combi PT assay)的应用情况。

方法

2013年6月至2015年10月期间,对来自低流行地区的85043份样本进行了检测。我们评估了假阳性率(FPR)、特异性和阳性预测值(PPV)。

结果

男性和女性的特异性分别为99.85%和99.82%。男性的PPV(50.75%)显著高于女性(17.05%),而FPR分别为0.15%和0.18%。假阳性(中位数:1.83,[四分位间距]:1.30,3.38)与确诊阳性(中位数:407.5,[四分位间距]:184.2,871.7)之间的差距巨大。假阳性病例的最高s/co比值为85.45,而确诊阳性病例的最低s/co比值为59.68。假阳性病例存在多种原因。

结论

需要设定最佳临界值以减少假阳性病例,并可靠地预测HIV感染的最终状态。回顾性分析将有助于我们更多地了解HIV的诊断。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Understanding the presence of false-positive antibodies in acute hepatitis.了解急性肝炎中假阳性抗体的存在情况。
J Infect Dis. 2014 Dec 15;210(12):1886-9. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu348. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
6
Causes of false-positive HIV rapid diagnostic test results.HIV 快速诊断检测假阳性结果的原因。
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014 Jan;12(1):49-62. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2014.866516.
7
HIV/AIDS trends in China.中国的艾滋病毒/艾滋病流行趋势
Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Nov;13(11):912-4. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70285-8. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
8
9
Laboratory diagnosis of HIV in adults: a review of current methods.成人 HIV 的实验室诊断:当前方法综述。
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Sep;57(5):712-8. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit281. Epub 2013 May 10.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验