Suppr超能文献

劈离式肝移植术后扩大右半肝供肝的多中心长期随访配对分析。

A matched pair analysis of multicenter longterm follow-up after split-liver transplantation with extended right grafts.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Liver Transpl. 2017 Nov;23(11):1384-1395. doi: 10.1002/lt.24808.

Abstract

Split-liver transplantation has been proposed as an alternative to whole liver (WL) transplantation to expand the donor pool, but studies comparing adult longterm outcomes between the 2 methods are conflicting and limited. This is the first Italian multicenter study that retrospectively analyzed 119 matched-pair recipients of whole and extended right grafts (ERGs) for longterm survival outcomes. In the overall population, WL recipients showed higher patient survival at 1 (93% versus 73%), 5 (87% versus 65%), and 10 years (83% versus 60%) after transplantation compared with split-liver recipients (P < 0.001); graft survivals of WL recipients were also superior at 1 (90% versus 76%), 5 (84% versus 57%), and 10 years (81% versus 52%) posttransplant (P < 0.001). However, among the 81 matched pairs that survived the first posttransplant year, 5- and 10-year patient survivals were 90% and 81% for split recipients and 99% and 96% for whole recipients, respectively (P = 0.34). The 5- and 10-year graft survivals were also comparable: 87% and 77% for split recipients, and 86% and 82% for whole recipients (P = 0.86). Cox regression analysis identified donor age >50, donor-to-recipient weight ratio < 1, retransplantation status, and United Network for Organ Sharing I-IIA status as risk factors for partial graft use. There were no significant differences in 5-year outcomes based on center volume. In conclusion, we demonstrate that adult liver transplantation with ERGs can achieve longterm success comparable with that of whole grafts in appropriate patients but should be selectively used in patients with risk factors. Liver Transplantation 23 1384-1395 2017 AASLD.

摘要

劈离式肝移植已被提议作为扩大供肝池的一种替代方法,用于全肝(WL)移植,但比较两种方法的成人长期结果的研究存在冲突和局限性。这是意大利首例多中心回顾性分析,比较了 119 例接受全肝和右半扩大肝(ERG)供肝的匹配对受者的长期生存结果。在总体人群中,WL 受者在移植后 1(93%比 73%)、5(87%比 65%)和 10 年(83%比 60%)的患者生存率更高(P<0.001);WL 受者的移植物生存率也更高,在移植后 1(90%比 76%)、5(84%比 57%)和 10 年(81%比 52%)(P<0.001)。然而,在 81 对度过移植后第一年的匹配对中,劈离组的 5 年和 10 年患者生存率分别为 90%和 81%,全肝组分别为 99%和 96%(P=0.34)。5 年和 10 年移植物生存率也相似:劈离组为 87%和 77%,全肝组为 86%和 82%(P=0.86)。Cox 回归分析确定供者年龄>50 岁、供者与受者体重比<1、再次移植状态和 UNOS I-IIA 状态是部分供肝使用的危险因素。根据中心容量,5 年结果无显著差异。总之,我们证明在合适的患者中,使用 ERG 进行成人肝移植可以获得与全肝移植相当的长期成功,但应选择性地用于有危险因素的患者。肝脏移植 23 1384-1395 2017 AASLD。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验