• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全州范围的外科培训计划为持续专业发展提供机会。

A Statewide Surgical Coaching Program Provides Opportunity for Continuous Professional Development.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2018 May;267(5):868-873. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002341.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002341
PMID:28650360
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We sought to develop and evaluate a video-based coaching program for board-eligible/certified surgeons.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Multiple disciplines utilize coaching for continuous professional development; however, coaching is not routinely employed for practicing surgeons.

METHODS

Peer-nominated surgeons were trained as coaches then paired with participant surgeons. After setting goals, each coaching pair reviewed video-recorded operations performed by the participating surgeon. Coaching sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded to identify topics discussed. The effectiveness with which our coaches were able to utilize the core principles and activities of coaching was evaluated using 3 different approaches: self-evaluation; evaluation by the participants; and assessment by the study team. Surveys of participating surgeons and coach-targeted interviews provided general feedback on the program. All measures utilized a 5-point Likert scale format ranging from 1 (low) to 5 (high).

RESULTS

Coach-participant surgeon pairs targeted technical, cognitive, and interpersonal aspects of performance. Other topics included managing intraoperative stress. Mean objective ratings of coach effectiveness was 3.1 ± 0.7, ranging from 2.0 to 5.0 on specific activities of coaching. Subjective ratings by coaches and participants were consistently higher. Coaches reported that the training provided effectively prepared them to facilitate coaching sessions. Participants were similarly positive about interactions with their coaches. Identified barriers were related to audio-video technology and scheduling of sessions. Overall, participants were satisfied with their experience (mean 4.4 ± 0.7) and found the coaching program valuable (mean 4.7 ± 0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report of cross-institutional surgical coaching for the continuous professional development of practicing surgeons, demonstrating perceived value among participants, as well as logistical challenges for implementing this evidence-based program. Future research is necessary to evaluate the impact of coaching on practice change and patient outcomes.

摘要

目的

我们旨在为有资格成为委员会认证外科医生的医生开发并评估一个基于视频的指导项目。

背景资料概要

多个学科领域都利用指导来进行持续的专业发展;然而,对于执业外科医生来说,指导并未得到常规应用。

方法

同行提名的外科医生接受培训成为指导者,然后与参与外科医生配对。在设定目标后,每对指导者和参与者都会审查参与外科医生记录的手术视频。指导会议会被录音、记录并编码,以确定讨论的主题。使用 3 种不同方法评估我们的指导者运用指导核心原则和活动的有效性:自我评估;参与者评估;和研究团队评估。参与外科医生和指导目标的访谈提供了有关该计划的一般反馈。所有措施都采用 5 分制的李克特量表格式,范围从 1(低)到 5(高)。

结果

指导者-参与者外科医生配对目标是手术表现的技术、认知和人际交往方面。其他主题包括术中压力管理。指导者有效性的客观平均评分是 3.1±0.7,在指导的具体活动中范围从 2.0 到 5.0。指导者和参与者的主观评分始终较高。指导者报告说,培训有效地为他们提供了指导会议的能力。参与者对与他们的指导者的互动也同样持积极态度。确定的障碍与音频-视频技术和会议安排有关。总体而言,参与者对他们的经验感到满意(平均 4.4±0.7),并认为指导项目有价值(平均 4.7±0.7)。

结论

这是首次报告跨机构的外科手术指导,用于执业外科医生的持续专业发展,在参与者中显示出价值,同时也为实施这一基于证据的计划带来了后勤挑战。未来的研究有必要评估指导对实践改变和患者结果的影响。

相似文献

1
A Statewide Surgical Coaching Program Provides Opportunity for Continuous Professional Development.全州范围的外科培训计划为持续专业发展提供机会。
Ann Surg. 2018 May;267(5):868-873. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002341.
2
Optimizing the Implementation of Surgical Coaching Through Feedback From Practicing Surgeons.通过实践外科医生的反馈来优化手术指导的实施。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Jan 1;156(1):42-49. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.4581.
3
Strategies for Building Peer Surgical Coaching Relationships.建立同行手术指导关系的策略。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Apr 19;152(4):e165540. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.5540.
4
Development and Assessment of the Wisconsin Surgical Coaching Rubric.威斯康星州手术指导评分表的制定与评估。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jun 1;155(6):486-492. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0424.
5
Surgeons' Coaching Techniques in the Surgical Coaching for Operative Performance Enhancement (SCOPE) Program.外科医生的指导技巧在手术操作绩效提升指导(SCOPE)项目中。
Ann Surg. 2022 Jan 1;275(1):e91-e98. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004323.
6
Formative Evaluation of a Peer Video-Based Coaching Initiative.基于同伴视频的辅导计划的形成性评价。
J Surg Res. 2021 Jan;257:169-177. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.07.048. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
7
Surgical Coaching for Operative Performance Enhancement (SCOPE): skill ratings and impact on surgeons' practice.手术指导对手术操作表现的提升作用(SCOPE):技能评级及其对外科医生实践的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3829-3839. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07776-1. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
8
Postgame analysis: using video-based coaching for continuous professional development.赛后分析:利用基于视频的指导进行持续的专业发展。
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Jan;214(1):115-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.10.009.
9
Training for excellence: using a multimodal videoconferencing platform to coach surgeons and improve intraoperative performance.追求卓越的培训:利用多模式视频会议平台指导外科医生并提高术中表现。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9406-9413. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10374-6. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
10
Identifying optimal program structure, motivations for and barriers to peer coaching participation for surgeons in practice: a qualitative synthesis.确定最佳的项目结构、促进和阻碍外科医生参与同行指导的动机:定性综合分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4738-4749. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07968-9. Epub 2020 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
How peer coaching can contribute to doctors' development as clinical supervisors: an interview study.同行指导如何促进医生作为临床督导的发展:一项访谈研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 19;25(1):1085. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07660-3.
2
Coaching for improving clinical performance of surgeons: a scoping review.指导外科医生提高临床绩效:一项范围综述
Updates Surg. 2025 Jan 20. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02077-5.
3
Development and application of a non-technical skills coaching intervention framework for surgeons: A pilot quality improvement initiative.
外科医生非技术技能辅导干预框架的开发与应用:一项试点质量改进计划。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 8;19(11):e0312125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312125. eCollection 2024.
4
Investigation of gender-based needs in academic otolaryngology.学术性耳鼻喉科学中基于性别的需求调查。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024 Mar 22;9(2):e1217. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1217. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Coaching with audiovisual technology in acute-care hospital settings: systematic review.急性护理医院环境中的视听技术辅导:系统评价。
BJS Open. 2023 Sep 5;7(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad017.
6
Leadership and Impostor Syndrome in Surgery.手术中的领导力和冒名顶替综合征。
J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Oct 1;237(4):585-595. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000788. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
7
Advancing leadership in surgery: a realist review of interventions and strategies to promote evidence-based leadership in healthcare.推进外科领导力:促进循证医疗领导力的干预措施和策略的现实主义评价。
Implement Sci. 2023 May 13;18(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01274-3.
8
Improving Surgical Excellence: Can Coaching Surgeons Improve Patient Engagement?提升手术卓越性:指导外科医生能否提高患者参与度?
World J Surg. 2023 May;47(5):1144-1150. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06827-z. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
9
Stress in surgical educational environments: a systematic review.手术教育环境中的压力:系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Nov 15;22(1):791. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03841-6.
10
Coaching for Surgeons: A Scoping Review of the Quantitative Evidence.外科医生培训:定量证据的范围综述
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Jul 8;3(3):e179. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000179. eCollection 2022 Sep.