Suppr超能文献

威斯康星州手术指导评分表的制定与评估。

Development and Assessment of the Wisconsin Surgical Coaching Rubric.

机构信息

Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison.

Department of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Wisconsin School of Education, Madison.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2020 Jun 1;155(6):486-492. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0424.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Surgical coaching continues to gain momentum as an innovative method for continuous professional development. A tool to measure the performance of a surgical coach is needed to provide formative feedback to coaches for continued skill development and to assess the fidelity of a coaching intervention for future research and dissemination.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the validity of the Wisconsin Surgical Coaching Rubric (WiSCoR), a novel tool to assess the performance of a peer surgical coach.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Surgical coaching sessions from November 2014 through February 2018 conducted by 2 statewide peer surgical coaching programs were audio recorded and transcribed. Twelve raters used WiSCoR to rate the performance of the surgical coach for each session. The study included peer surgical coaches in the Wisconsin Surgical Coaching Program (n = 8) and the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative coaching program (n = 15). The data were analyzed in 2019.

INTERVENTIONS OR EXPOSURES

Use of WiSCoR to rate peer surgical coaching sessions.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

There were 282 WiSCoR ratings from the 106 coaching sessions included in the study. WiSCoR was evaluated using a framework, including inter-rater reliability assessed with Gwet weighted agreement coefficent. Descriptive statistics of WiSCoR were calculated.

RESULTS

Eight coaches (35%) and 11 coachees (29%) were from the Wisconsin Surgical Program and 15 coaches (65%) and 27 coachees (71%) were from the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative. The validity of WiSCoR is supported by high interrater reliability (Gwet weighted agreement coefficient, 0.87) as well as a weakly positive correlation of WiSCoR to coachee ratings of coaches (r = 0.22; P = .04), rigorous content development, consistent rater training, and the association of WiSCoR with coach and coaching program development. The mean (SD) overall coach performance rating using WiSCoR was 3.23 (0.82; range, 1-5).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

WiSCoR is a reliable measure that can assess the performance of a surgical coach, inform fidelity to coaching principles, and provide formative feedback to surgical coaches. While coachee ratings may reflect coachee satisfaction, they are not able to determine the quality of a coach.

摘要

重要性

外科指导作为一种持续专业发展的创新方法,继续受到重视。需要一种衡量外科指导者表现的工具,以便为指导者提供形成性反馈,促进技能发展,并评估指导干预的保真度,以便未来的研究和传播。

目的

评估威斯康星外科指导量表(WiSCoR)的有效性,这是一种评估同行外科指导者表现的新工具。

设计、环境和参与者:2014 年 11 月至 2018 年 2 月,由 2 个全州范围内的同行外科指导项目进行的外科指导课程进行了音频录制和转录。12 名评估员使用 WiSCoR 为每个课程的外科指导者表现进行评分。该研究包括威斯康星州外科指导计划中的同行外科指导者(n=8)和密歇根州减重手术协作指导计划中的同行外科指导者(n=15)。数据于 2019 年进行分析。

干预或暴露

使用 WiSCoR 对同行外科指导课程进行评分。

主要结果和措施

在包括的 106 次指导课程中,有 282 次 WiSCoR 评分。使用框架评估 WiSCoR,包括使用 Gwet 加权一致性系数评估的内部评估者可靠性。计算了 WiSCoR 的描述性统计数据。

结果

8 名教练(35%)和 11 名学员(29%)来自威斯康星州外科项目,15 名教练(65%)和 27 名学员(71%)来自密歇根州减重手术协作指导项目。WiSCoR 的有效性得到了高内部评估者可靠性(Gwet 加权一致性系数为 0.87)以及 WiSCoR 与学员对教练的评价之间的弱正相关(r=0.22;P=0.04)、严格的内容开发、一致的评估者培训以及 WiSCoR 与教练和指导计划发展的关联的支持。使用 WiSCoR 的整体教练表现评分的平均值(SD)为 3.23(0.82;范围,1-5)。

结论和相关性

WiSCoR 是一种可靠的衡量标准,可以评估外科教练的表现,告知指导原则的保真度,并为外科教练提供形成性反馈。虽然学员的评价可能反映了学员的满意度,但它们并不能确定教练的质量。

相似文献

5
Strategies for Building Peer Surgical Coaching Relationships.建立同行手术指导关系的策略。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Apr 19;152(4):e165540. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.5540.

引用本文的文献

1
Video recording in GI endoscopy.胃肠内镜检查中的视频记录。
VideoGIE. 2025 Jan 13;10(2):67-80. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2024.09.013. eCollection 2025 Feb.

本文引用的文献

3
Surgical coaching for individual performance improvement.针对个人绩效提升的手术指导。
Ann Surg. 2015 Jan;261(1):32-4. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000776.
5
A primer on the validity of assessment instruments.评估工具效度入门
J Grad Med Educ. 2011 Jun;3(2):119-20. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-11-00075.1.
7
The paradox of excellence.卓越的悖论。
Harv Bus Rev. 2011 Jun;89(6):119-23, 139.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验