Suppr超能文献

基于社区的医院预防措施重点:公众审议的结果。

Community Priorities for Hospital-Based Prevention Initiatives: Results From a Deliberating Public.

机构信息

Center for Evaluation and Applied Research (Mss Realmuto, Scherer, and Kamler and Dr Weiss), The New York Academy of Medicine, New York, New York (Dr Gold).

出版信息

J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 Jul/Aug;24(4):318-325. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000609.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Internal revenue service provisions require not-for-profit hospitals to provide "community benefit." In addition, the Affordable Care Act requires these hospitals to conduct community health needs assessments that involve appropriate stakeholders. These requirements signal government interest in creating opportunities for developing programs that are well tailored and responsive to the needs of the communities served. Gaining meaningful input from residents is a critical aspect of these processes.

OBJECTIVE

To implement public deliberations that explore local resident priorities for use of a hospital's community benefit resources to prevent chronic disease.

METHODS

Public deliberation is a method of community engagement that can provide guidance to decision makers on value-laden issues when technical solutions alone are inadequate to provide direction or set priorities. Three deliberations featuring presentations by experts and discussions among participants were convened with a cross section of residents in Brooklyn, New York. Participants were asked whether new hospital initiatives should prioritize: clinical prevention, community-based interventions, or action on broader policies affecting population health. Pre- and postsurveys, as well as qualitative methods, were used to assess knowledge and attitudes.

RESULTS

Postdeliberation, participants had significant changes in knowledge, particularly on the impact of education on health. Participants prioritized community-based and policy interventions over expanding clinical prevention capacity.

CONCLUSIONS

Public deliberation offers a method to probe informed constituent views of how a hospital can best promote its community's health. Informed local residents felt that hospitals should frame health-promoting activities more broadly than is current practice. Not-for-profit hospitals gain significant tax advantages. Increased insurance rates suggest that some hospitals will experience savings in uncompensated care that can be used to promote health more broadly. Vetting priorities for the use of new resources with informed community members can be accomplished through public deliberation. These results suggest community support for nonclinical approaches to disease prevention.

摘要

背景

国内税收服务条款要求非营利性医院提供“社区福利”。此外,《平价医疗法案》要求这些医院进行社区卫生需求评估,让相关利益方参与其中。这些要求表明政府有兴趣为制定计划创造机会,这些计划需要很好地适应并满足所服务社区的需求。从居民那里获得有意义的意见是这些过程的一个关键方面。

目的

实施公共讨论,探讨当地居民对使用医院社区福利资源预防慢性病的优先事项。

方法

公共讨论是一种社区参与方法,当仅靠技术解决方案不足以提供指导或确定优先事项时,可以为决策者提供有关高价值问题的指导。在纽约布鲁克林,召集了具有代表性的居民,开展了三次讨论,内容包括专家介绍和参与者之间的讨论。参与者被要求回答新的医院倡议应该优先考虑:临床预防、基于社区的干预,还是针对影响人口健康的更广泛政策的行动。使用预调查和后调查以及定性方法来评估知识和态度。

结果

讨论后,参与者的知识水平有了显著变化,特别是关于教育对健康的影响方面。参与者优先考虑社区和政策干预,而不是扩大临床预防能力。

结论

公共讨论提供了一种方法,可以探究有关医院如何最好地促进其社区健康的知情选民意见。知情的当地居民认为,医院应该更广泛地构建促进健康的活动,而不是当前的做法。非营利性医院获得了巨大的税收优势。保险费率的提高表明,一些医院将在未得到补偿的护理方面节省费用,可以更广泛地用于促进健康。通过公共讨论,可以对新资源的使用优先级进行审核,让知情的社区成员参与其中。这些结果表明,社区支持非临床方法预防疾病。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验