Hines Cynthia J, Jackson Matthew V, Christianson Annette L, Clark John C, Arnold James E, Pretty Jack R, Deddens James A
a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Cincinnati , Ohio.
b URS Professional Solutions/RCS Corporation , Aiken , South Carolina.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2017 Nov;14(11):882-897. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2017.1339164.
For decades, bisphenol A (BPA) has been used in making polycarbonate, epoxy, and phenolic resins and certain investment casting waxes, yet published exposure data are lacking for U.S. manufacturing workers. In 2013-2014, BPA air and hand exposures were quantified for 78 workers at six U.S. companies making BPA or BPA-based products. Exposure measures included an inhalable-fraction personal air sample on each of two consecutive work days (n = 146), pre- and end-shift hand wipe samples on the second day (n = 74 each), and surface wipe samples (n = 88). Potential determinants of BPA air and end-shift hand exposures (after natural log transformation) were assessed in univariate and multiple regression mixed models. The geometric mean (GM) BPA air concentration was 4.0 µg/m (maximum 920 µg/m). The end-shift GM BPA hand level (26 µg/sample) was 10-times higher than the pre-shift level (2.6 µg/sample). BPA air and hand exposures differed significantly by industry and job. BPA air concentrations and end-shift hand levels were highest in the BPA-filled wax manufacturing/reclaim industry (GM = 48 µg/m, GM = 130 µg/sample) and in the job of working with molten BPA-filled wax (GM = 43 µg/m, GM = 180 µg/sample), and lowest in the phenolic resins industry (GM = 0.85 µg/m, GM = 0.43 µg/sample) and in the job of flaking phenolic resins (GM = 0.62 µg/m, GM = 0.38 µg/sample). Determinants of increased BPA air concentration were industry, handling BPA containers, spilling BPA, and spending ≥50% of the shift in production areas; increasing age was associated with lower air concentrations. BPA hand exposure determinants were influenced by high values for two workers; for all other workers, tasks involving contact with BPA-containing materials and spending ≥50% of the shift in production areas were associated with increased BPA hand levels. Surface wipe BPA levels were significantly lower in eating/office areas (GM = 9.3 µg/100 cm) than in production areas (GM = 140 µg/100 cm). In conclusion, worker BPA exposure was associated with tasks and conditions affecting both inhalation and dermal exposure. The potential for BPA-related health effects among these workers is unknown.
几十年来,双酚A(BPA)一直被用于制造聚碳酸酯、环氧树脂、酚醛树脂以及某些熔模铸造蜡,但美国制造业工人的公开暴露数据却很缺乏。在2013 - 2014年,对美国六家生产双酚A或双酚A基产品的公司的78名工人进行了双酚A空气暴露和手部暴露的量化。暴露测量包括在连续两个工作日的每一天采集可吸入部分的个人空气样本(n = 146),在第二天班前和班末采集手部擦拭样本(各n = 74),以及表面擦拭样本(n = 88)。在单变量和多元回归混合模型中评估了双酚A空气暴露和班末手部暴露(自然对数转换后)的潜在决定因素。双酚A空气浓度几何均值(GM)为4.0μg/m³(最大值920μg/m³)。班末双酚A手部水平几何均值(26μg/样本)比班前水平(2.6μg/样本)高10倍。双酚A空气和手部暴露在行业和工作岗位上有显著差异。双酚A空气浓度和班末手部水平在双酚A填充蜡制造/回收行业中最高(GM = 48μg/m³,GM = 130μg/样本),以及在处理熔融双酚A填充蜡的工作岗位中最高(GM = 43μg/m³,GM = 180μg/样本),而在酚醛树脂行业中最低(GM = 0.85μg/m³,GM = 0.43μg/样本),以及在酚醛树脂片状加工工作岗位中最低(GM = 0.62μg/m³,GM = 0.38μg/样本)。双酚A空气浓度升高的决定因素是行业、处理双酚A容器、双酚A溢出以及在生产区域工作时间≥50%;年龄增加与空气浓度降低有关。两名工人的高值影响了双酚A手部暴露的决定因素;对于所有其他工人,涉及接触含双酚A材料的任务以及在生产区域工作时间≥50%与双酚A手部水平升高有关。饮食/办公区域的表面擦拭双酚A水平(GM = 9.3μg/100cm²)显著低于生产区域(GM = 140μg/100cm²)。总之,工人的双酚A暴露与影响吸入和皮肤暴露的任务及条件有关。这些工人中双酚A相关健康影响的可能性尚不清楚。