Wei John T, Dunn Rodney, Nygaard Ingrid, Burgio Kathryn, Lukacz Emily S, Markland Alayne, Wren Patricia A, Brubaker Linda, Barber Matthew D, Jelovsek J Eric, Spino Cathie, Meikle Susie, Janz Nancy
From the *University of Michigan Data Coordinating Center, Ann Arbor, MI; †University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; ‡University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, Oakland University, Rochester, MI; §UC San Diego Health Systems, San Diego, CA; ∥Oakland University, Rochester, MI; ¶Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL; **Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; and ††The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland, Washington DC.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jul/Aug;23(4):232-237. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000431.
To establish validity for the Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (PFDN) self-administered Adaptive Behavior Index (ABI) and to assess whether ABI assesses known discordance between severity of pelvic floor symptoms and self-reported bother.
In addition to the ABI questionnaire, participants in 1 of 6 Pelvic Floor Disorders Network trials completed condition-specific measures of pretreatment symptom severity (including Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory; PFDI) and health-related quality of life (Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire; PFIQ). The final survey was developed from an iterative process using subject and expert endorsement, factor analyses, and response distributions. Domains were created using a development cohort (n = 304 women), reliability and validity were established using a validation cohort (n = 596 women), and test-retest reliability was assessed (n = 111 women).
Factor analyses supported an 11-item avoidance domain and a 6-item hygiene domain. Cronbach' alphas were 0.88 and 0.68, respectively. Test-retest reliability was 0.84 for both domains. Construct validity was demonstrated in correlations between the ABI domains and baseline PFDI and PFIQ (r values, 0.43-0.79 with all P values <0.0001). Moreover, the ABI accounted for 8% to 26% of unexplained variance between the symptoms severity measure and the impact on health related quality of life. After treatment, avoidance domain scores improved for urinary and fecal incontinence groups and hygiene scores improved for the fecal incontinence group.
The ABI is a reliable and valid measure in women with pelvic floor disorders. Adaptive behaviors account in part for discordance between pelvic floor symptom severity and bother.
确立盆底功能障碍网络(PFDN)的自我管理适应性行为指数(ABI)的有效性,并评估ABI是否能评估盆底症状严重程度与自我报告的困扰之间已知的不一致性。
除了ABI问卷外,6项盆底功能障碍网络试验中的1项试验的参与者还完成了特定病情的治疗前症状严重程度测量(包括盆底困扰量表;PFDI)和健康相关生活质量测量(盆底影响问卷;PFIQ)。最终调查问卷是通过一个反复迭代的过程制定的,该过程采用了受试者和专家认可、因素分析以及反应分布。使用一个开发队列(n = 304名女性)创建了各个领域,使用一个验证队列(n = 596名女性)确立了可靠性和有效性,并评估了重测信度(n = 111名女性)。
因素分析支持一个包含11个条目的回避领域和一个包含6个条目的卫生领域。克朗巴哈系数分别为0.88和0.68。两个领域的重测信度均为0.84。ABI领域与基线PFDI和PFIQ之间的相关性证明了结构效度(r值为0.43 - 0.79,所有P值<0.0001)。此外,ABI在症状严重程度测量与对健康相关生活质量的影响之间的未解释方差中占8%至26%。治疗后,尿失禁和粪失禁组的回避领域得分有所改善,粪失禁组的卫生得分有所改善。
ABI是评估盆底功能障碍女性的一种可靠且有效的测量工具。适应性行为部分解释了盆底症状严重程度与困扰之间的不一致性。