• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于盆腔器官脱垂女性的患者报告结局测量指标:系统评价。

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Use in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jun 1;141(6):1098-1114. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005212. Epub 2023 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005212
PMID:37073897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10524573/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the psychometric properties of existing patient-reported outcome measures for women with prolapse using the COSMIN (Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments) framework. Additional objectives were to describe the patient-reported outcome scoring method or interpretation, methods of administration, and to compile a list of the non-English languages in which the patient-reported outcomes are reportedly validated.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and EMBASE was searched through September 2021. Study characteristics, patient-reported outcome details, and psychometric testing data were extracted. Methodologic quality was assessed with COSMIN guidelines.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Studies reporting the validation of a patient-reported outcome in women with prolapse (or women with pelvic floor disorders that included a prolapse assessment) and reporting psychometric testing data on English-language patient-reported outcome for at least one measurement property per COSMIN and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services definitions were included, as well as studies reporting the translation of an existing patient-reported outcome into another language, a new method of patient-reported outcome administration, or a scoring interpretation. Studies reporting only pretreatment and posttreatment scores, only content or face validity, or only findings for nonprolapse domains of the patient-reported outcome were excluded.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Fifty-four studies covering 32 patient-reported outcomes were included; 106 studies assessing translation into a non-English language were excluded from the formal review. The number of validation studies per patient-reported outcome (one version of one questionnaire) ranged from 1 to 11. Reliability was the most reported measurement property, and most measurement properties received an average rating of sufficient. The condition-specific patient-reported outcomes had on average more studies and reported data across more measurement properties compared with adapted and generic patient-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Although measurement property data vary on patient-reported outcomes for women with prolapse, most data were of good quality. Overall, condition-specific patient-reported outcomes had more studies and reported data across more measurement properties.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42021278796.

摘要

目的

使用 COSMIN(健康测量仪器选择共识标准)框架描述现有针对脱垂女性的患者报告结局测量工具的心理测量学特性。此外,还描述了患者报告结局的评分方法或解释、管理方法,并编制了一份报告验证过的非英语语言的患者报告结局清单。

数据来源

通过 2021 年 9 月对 PubMed 和 EMBASE 进行了检索。提取了研究特征、患者报告结局详细信息和心理测量学测试数据。使用 COSMIN 指南评估方法学质量。

研究选择方法

纳入了报告针对脱垂女性(或包含脱垂评估的盆底功能障碍女性)的患者报告结局验证,并报告了至少一项 COSMIN 和美国卫生与公众服务部定义的测量特性的英语患者报告结局心理测量学测试数据的研究,以及报告将现有患者报告结局翻译成另一种语言、患者报告结局管理的新方法或评分解释的研究。仅报告治疗前后评分、仅内容或表面有效性、或仅报告患者报告结局非脱垂领域结果的研究被排除在外。

列表、综合和结果:纳入了 54 项涵盖 32 项患者报告结局的研究;106 项评估翻译成非英语语言的研究从正式审查中排除。每个患者报告结局(一种问卷的一个版本)的验证研究数量从 1 到 11 不等。可靠性是报告最多的测量特性,大多数测量特性的评价等级为充足。与适应性和通用性患者报告结局相比,特定于疾病的患者报告结局平均有更多的研究和更多的测量特性报告数据。

结论

尽管脱垂女性患者报告结局的测量特性数据各不相同,但大多数数据质量良好。总体而言,特定于疾病的患者报告结局有更多的研究和更多的测量特性报告数据。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO,CRD42021278796。

相似文献

1
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Use in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review.用于盆腔器官脱垂女性的患者报告结局测量指标:系统评价。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jun 1;141(6):1098-1114. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005212. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
2
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review Using the COnsensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) Checklist.盆腔器官脱垂的患者报告结局指标:使用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)清单进行的系统评价
BJOG. 2025 Jan;132(2):105-117. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17971. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
3
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
4
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
5
Evaluating the psychometric measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for uterine fibroids using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines: a systematic review.使用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)指南评估子宫肌瘤患者报告结局测量指标的心理测量特性:一项系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 28;15(7):e087443. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087443.
6
A systematic review of tools designed for teacher proxy-report of children's physical literacy or constituting elements.系统评价教师代理报告儿童身体素养或构成要素的工具。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Oct 8;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01162-3.
7
Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures in chronic pain conditions with central sensitization- a systematic review and meta-analysis.中枢敏化慢性疼痛状况下患者报告结局指标的心理测量学特性——一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Jul 11;9(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00919-9.
8
Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures assessing recovery from hand fractures: a systematic review.评估手部骨折康复的患者报告结局测量工具的心理测量学特性:系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Dec;33(12):3213-3221. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03768-z. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
9
Biopsychosocial profile of women with pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review.盆腔器官脱垂女性的生物心理社会特征:系统评价。
Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057231181012. doi: 10.1177/17455057231181012.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.

引用本文的文献

1
MR Defecography Improves Diagnosis of Postoperative Pelvic Floor Dysfunction After Gynecological Surgery.磁共振排粪造影改善妇科手术后盆底功能障碍的诊断。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jun 26;15(13):1625. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15131625.
2
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review Using the COnsensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) Checklist.盆腔器官脱垂的患者报告结局指标:使用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)清单进行的系统评价
BJOG. 2025 Jan;132(2):105-117. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17971. Epub 2024 Oct 3.

本文引用的文献

1
International Urogynecology Consultation: Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROs) use in the evaluation of patients with pelvic organ prolapse.国际泌尿妇科咨询:在评估盆腔器官脱垂患者时使用患者报告结局测量(PROs)。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Oct;33(10):2603-2631. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05315-1. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
2
Is the Visual Analogue Scale inferior to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory for assessing symptom bother of pelvic organ prolapse?视觉模拟评分法在评估盆腔器官脱垂症状困扰方面不如盆腔器官脱垂困扰问卷吗?
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Dec;61(6):918-921. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13412. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
3
Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for the Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire - IUGA Revised (PISQ-IR).
盆腔器官脱垂-尿失禁性功能问卷 - IUGA 修订版(PISQ-IR)的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。
J Sex Med. 2021 Jul;18(7):1265-1270. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.04.005. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
4
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
5
Responsiveness of two sexual function questionnaires: PISQ-IR and FSFI in women with pelvic floor disorders.两种性功能问卷:PISQ-IR 和 FSFI 在盆底功能障碍女性中的反应性。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2021 Jan;40(1):358-366. doi: 10.1002/nau.24568. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
6
Minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for PFDI-20 and POPDI-6 in POP surgery.用于 POP 手术的 PFDI-20 和 POPDI-6 的最小有意义差异和患者可接受症状状态。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Dec;32(12):3169-3176. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04513-z. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
7
Development and initial psychometric testing of a body-image domain within an electronic pelvic floor questionnaire (ePAQ-pelvic floor).电子盆腔问卷(ePAQ-盆腔)中身体意象领域的开发和初步心理计量学测试。
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Jun;31(6):1245-1253. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04247-y. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
8
A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies on pelvic organ prolapse for the development of core outcome sets.系统评价和定性研究的荟萃分析对盆腔器官脱垂核心结局集的发展。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Mar;39(3):880-889. doi: 10.1002/nau.24297. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
9
Identification of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-IUGA Revised (PISQ-IR) Cutoff Scores for Impaired Sexual Function in Women with Pelvic Floor Disorders.盆底功能障碍女性性功能受损的盆腔器官脱垂/尿失禁性功能问卷-国际尿控学会修订版(PISQ-IR)临界值的确定。
J Clin Med. 2019 Dec 19;9(1):13. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010013.
10
Measuring Pelvic Floor Disorder Symptoms Using Patient-Reported Instruments: Proceedings of the Consensus Meeting of the Pelvic Floor Consortium of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the International Continence Society, the American Urogynecologic Society, and the Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction.使用患者报告工具测量盆底功能障碍症状:美国结直肠外科医师学会盆底协会、国际尿失禁学会、美国泌尿妇科协会以及尿动力学、女性盆底医学与泌尿生殖重建学会共识会议论文集
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jan/Feb;26(1):1-15. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000817.