• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估数字行为咨询方案对降低劳动力人群慢性病风险因素的影响。

Evaluation of a Digital Behavioral Counseling Program for Reducing Risk Factors for Chronic Disease in a Workforce.

机构信息

College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia (Mr Wilson); Medical Affairs, Omada Health Inc. (Dr Castro Sweet); University of California Davis, Davis (Dr Edge); University of California Berkeley School of Public Health, Berkeley(Ms Madero); Mercer Health and Benefits, LLC (Ms McGuire); Iron Mountain, Inc. (Ms Pilsmaker, Mr Kirschner), Boston, Massachusetts; Omada Health, Inc. (Mr Carpenter), San Francisco, California.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Aug;59(8):e150-e155. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001091.

DOI:10.1097/JOM.0000000000001091
PMID:28650899
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5540355/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a digitally delivered, intensive behavioral counseling program for a workforce at risk for obesity-related chronic disease.

METHODS

Employees were offered a digital health program modeled after the diabetes prevention program (DPP). Annual workforce health assessments were used to examine changes in chronic disease risk factors between participants (n = 634) relative to a matched comparison group (n = 1268).

RESULTS

Overall, employees were gaining an average of 3.5 pounds annually before program inception. Program engagement was positive; 83% completed the majority of the curriculum and 31% lost at least 5% of their starting weight. Compared with non-participating peers, participants demonstrated reduced weight, improved fasting blood glucose, and improved nutritional intake after a year.

CONCLUSIONS

The digital health program was effective for engaging employees in health behavior change. Digital options facilitate widespread implementation.

摘要

目的

评估一个针对有肥胖相关慢性病风险的劳动力的数字传输强化行为咨询计划。

方法

向员工提供一个模仿糖尿病预防计划(DPP)的数字健康计划。利用年度劳动力健康评估,考察参与者(n=634)相对于匹配对照组(n=1268)的慢性疾病风险因素变化。

结果

总体而言,员工在项目启动前平均每年增重 3.5 磅。项目参与度呈积极态势;83%的人完成了大部分课程,31%的人至少减掉了起始体重的 5%。与未参与的同事相比,参与者在一年后体重减轻、空腹血糖改善和营养摄入增加。

结论

数字健康计划有效地促使员工参与健康行为改变。数字选择促进了广泛的实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4b1/5540355/42fe332c4484/joem-59-e150-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4b1/5540355/6cd18cbc80ca/joem-59-e150-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4b1/5540355/42fe332c4484/joem-59-e150-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4b1/5540355/6cd18cbc80ca/joem-59-e150-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4b1/5540355/42fe332c4484/joem-59-e150-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a Digital Behavioral Counseling Program for Reducing Risk Factors for Chronic Disease in a Workforce.评估数字行为咨询方案对降低劳动力人群慢性病风险因素的影响。
J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Aug;59(8):e150-e155. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001091.
2
Impact of a Digital Diabetes Prevention Program on Risk Factors for Chronic Disease in a Workforce Cohort.数字化糖尿病预防计划对劳动力队列中慢性病相关风险因素的影响。
J Occup Environ Med. 2020 Dec;62(12):1040-1045. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002044.
3
Combined diet and exercise intervention in the workplace: effect on cardiovascular disease risk factors.工作场所的饮食与运动联合干预:对心血管疾病风险因素的影响。
AAOHN J. 2007 Mar;55(3):109-14. doi: 10.1177/216507990705500303.
4
Lifestyle intervention reduces body weight and improves cardiometabolic risk factors in worksites.生活方式干预可减轻体重并改善工作场所的心血管代谢危险因素。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Apr;97(4):667-76. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.046995. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
5
Predictors of success of a lifestyle intervention in relation to weight loss and improvement in glucose tolerance among individuals at high risk for type 2 diabetes: the FIN-D2D project.2型糖尿病高危个体中与体重减轻及糖耐量改善相关的生活方式干预成功的预测因素:芬兰糖尿病预防研究(FIN-D2D)项目
J Prim Care Community Health. 2013 Jan;4(1):59-66. doi: 10.1177/2150131912444130. Epub 2012 May 14.
6
The Impact of a Worksite-Based Diabetes Prevention Intervention: A Pilot Study.一项基于工作场所的糖尿病预防干预措施的影响:一项试点研究。
Popul Health Manag. 2017 Jun;20(3):233-238. doi: 10.1089/pop.2016.0055. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
7
A National Effort to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes: Participant-Level Evaluation of CDC's National Diabetes Prevention Program.全国努力预防 2 型糖尿病:美国疾病控制与预防中心国家糖尿病预防计划的参与者水平评估。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Oct;40(10):1331-1341. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2099. Epub 2017 May 12.
8
Implementation and outcomes of the New York State YMCA diabetes prevention program: a multisite community-based translation, 2010-2012.纽约州基督教青年会糖尿病预防项目的实施与成果:一项基于社区的多地点转化研究,2010 - 2012年
Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Jul 10;11:E115. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.140006.
9
Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program: a comprehensive model for prevention training and program delivery.将糖尿病预防计划进行翻译:预防培训和计划实施的综合模式。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Dec;37(6):505-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.07.020.
10
The feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of a Promotora-Led Diabetes Prevention Program (PL-DPP) in Latinas: a pilot study.拉丁裔中由健康促进员主导的糖尿病预防项目(PL-DPP)的可行性、可接受性及初步效果:一项试点研究
Diabetes Educ. 2015 Aug;41(4):485-94. doi: 10.1177/0145721715586576. Epub 2015 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital Health Interventions to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review.预防2型糖尿病的数字健康干预措施:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 25;27:e67507. doi: 10.2196/67507.
2
Real-World Outcomes of a Digital Behavioral Coaching Intervention to Improve Employee Health Status: Retrospective Observational Study.数字行为教练干预改善员工健康状况的真实世界结果:回顾性观察研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Sep 10;12:e50356. doi: 10.2196/50356.
3
Factors Influencing Workplace Health Promotion Interventions for Workers in the Semiconductor Industry According to Risk Levels of Chronic Disease.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of weight maintenance and loss on diabetes risk and burden: a population-based study in 33,184 participants.体重维持和减轻对糖尿病风险及负担的影响:一项基于33184名参与者的人群研究。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Feb 6;17(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4081-6.
2
Erratum. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Sec. 2. In Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2016. Diabetes Care 2016;39(Suppl. 1):S13-S22.勘误。糖尿病的分类与诊断。第2节。载于《2016年糖尿病医疗护理标准》。《糖尿病护理》2016年;39(增刊1):S13 - S22。
Diabetes Care. 2016 Sep;39(9):1653. doi: 10.2337/dc16-er09.
3
A Randomized Controlled Trial Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program to a University Worksite, Ohio, 2012-2014.
根据慢性病风险水平影响半导体行业工人工作场所健康促进干预措施的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 29;18(21):11383. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111383.
4
A systematic review of the use of dietary self-monitoring in behavioural weight loss interventions: delivery, intensity and effectiveness.行为减肥干预中饮食自我监测的应用:实施方式、强度及效果的系统评价
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Dec;24(17):5885-5913. doi: 10.1017/S136898002100358X. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
5
Nutrition and physical activity interventions for the general population with and without cardiometabolic risk: a scoping review.针对有和无心血管代谢风险的一般人群的营养和身体活动干预措施:范围综述。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Oct;24(14):4718-4736. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021002184. Epub 2021 May 25.
6
Cost Savings and Reduced Health Care Utilization Associated with Participation in a Digital Diabetes Prevention Program in an Adult Workforce Population.参与成人劳动力人群数字糖尿病预防项目所带来的成本节约和医疗保健利用率降低
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2020 Aug 18;7(2):139-147. doi: 10.36469/jheor.2020.14529. eCollection 2020.
7
A systematic review of the behaviour change techniques and digital features in technology-driven type 2 diabetes prevention interventions.对技术驱动型2型糖尿病预防干预措施中的行为改变技术和数字特征的系统评价。
Digit Health. 2020 Mar 24;6:2055207620914427. doi: 10.1177/2055207620914427. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
8
Evaluation of a Digital Diabetes Prevention Program Adapted for Low-Income Patients, 2016-2018.2016-2018 年,为低收入患者量身定制的数字化糖尿病预防计划评估。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Nov 27;16:E155. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.190156.
9
Engagement With a Digital Platform for Multimodal Cognitive Assessment and Multidomain Intervention in a Japanese Population: Pilot, Quasi-Experimental, Longitudinal Study.在日本人群中使用数字平台进行多模态认知评估和多领域干预的参与情况: 一项试点、准实验、纵向研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Oct 25;7(10):e15733. doi: 10.2196/15733.
10
Outcomes of a Weight Loss Intervention to Prevent Diabetes Among Low-Income Residents of East Harlem, New York.纽约东哈莱姆区低收入居民预防糖尿病的减肥干预结果。
Health Educ Behav. 2019 Dec;46(6):1073-1082. doi: 10.1177/1090198119868232. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
一项将糖尿病预防计划应用于俄亥俄州某大学校园工作场所的随机对照试验,2012年至2014年。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Nov 25;12:E210. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150301.
4
Improving employee health: evaluation of a worksite lifestyle change program to decrease risk factors for diabetes and cardiovascular disease.改善员工健康:一项旨在降低糖尿病和心血管疾病风险因素的工作场所生活方式改变计划的评估
J Occup Environ Med. 2015 Mar;57(3):284-91. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000350.
5
FUEL Your Life: A Translation of the Diabetes Prevention Program to Worksites.为你的生活注入动力:将糖尿病预防计划推广至工作场所
Am J Health Promot. 2016 Jan-Feb;30(3):188-97. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130411-QUAN-169. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
6
Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program into an Online Social Network: Validation against CDC Standards.将糖尿病预防计划转化为在线社交网络:对照美国疾病控制与预防中心标准进行验证。
Diabetes Educ. 2014 Jul;40(4):435-443. doi: 10.1177/0145721714531339. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
7
Reducing obesity among employees of a manufacturing plant: translating the Diabetes Prevention Program to the workplace.减少制造厂员工的肥胖率:将糖尿病预防计划转化到工作场所。
Workplace Health Saf. 2014 Apr;62(4):136-41. doi: 10.1177/216507991406200402.
8
Preventing type 2 diabetes in communities across the U.S.: the National Diabetes Prevention Program.在美国各地社区预防 2 型糖尿病:国家糖尿病预防计划。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Apr;44(4 Suppl 4):S346-51. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.12.009.
9
A comparative approach to using the diabetes prevention program to reduce diabetes risk in a worksite setting.一种在工作场所环境中运用糖尿病预防计划降低糖尿病风险的比较方法。
Health Promot Pract. 2013 Mar;14(2):199-204. doi: 10.1177/1524839912437786. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
10
Reductions in employee productivity impairment observed after implementation of web-based worksite health promotion programs.实施基于网络的工作场所健康促进计划后,员工生产力受损情况减少。
J Occup Environ Med. 2011 Dec;53(12):1404-12. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182337726.