Univ. Lille, CNRS, CHU Lille, UMR 9193 - SCALab - Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives, Lille, France.
Univ. Lille, CNRS, CHU Lille, UMR 9193 - SCALab - Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives, Lille, France.
Cortex. 2018 Aug;105:97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
We investigated eye movement during past and future thinking. Participants were invited to retrieve past events and to imagine future events while their scan path was recorded by an eye-tracker. Past thinking triggered more fixation (p < .05), and saccade counts (p < .05) than future thinking. Past and future thinking triggered a similar duration of fixations and saccades, as well as a similar amplitude of saccades. Interestingly, participants rated past thinking as more vivid than future thinking (p < .01). Therefore, the vividness of past thinking seems to be accompanied by an increased number of fixations and saccades. Fixations and saccades in past thinking can be interpreted as an attempt by the visual system to find (through saccades) and activate (through fixations) stored memory representations. The same interpretation can be applied to future thinking as this ability requires activation of past experiences. However, future thinking triggers fewer fixations and saccades than past thinking: this may be due to its decreased demand on visual imagery, but could also be related to a potentially deleterious effect of eye movements on spatial imagery required for future thinking.
我们研究了过去和未来思考时的眼球运动。参与者被邀请回忆过去的事件并想象未来的事件,同时他们的扫描路径被眼动追踪器记录下来。过去的思考比未来的思考引发了更多的注视(p<0.05)和眼跳次数(p<0.05)。过去和未来的思考引发了相似的注视和眼跳持续时间,以及相似的眼跳幅度。有趣的是,参与者认为过去的思考比未来的思考更生动(p<0.01)。因此,过去思考的生动性似乎伴随着注视和眼跳次数的增加。过去思考中的注视和眼跳可以被解释为视觉系统试图通过眼跳找到(通过眼跳)和激活(通过注视)存储的记忆表征。这种解释也可以应用于未来思考,因为这种能力需要激活过去的经验。然而,未来的思考比过去的思考引发的注视和眼跳次数更少:这可能是由于它对视觉意象的需求减少,但也可能与眼动对未来思考所需的空间意象的潜在有害影响有关。