Tsiouli Kleopatra, Topouzelis Nikolaos, Papadopoulos Moschos A, Gkantidis Nikolaos
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Jul;152(1):80-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.12.017.
The aim of this research was to investigate the perceived facial changes in Class II Division 1 patients with convex profiles after functional orthopedic treatment followed by fixed orthodontic appliances.
Pretreatment and posttreatment profile photographs of 12 Class II Division 1 patients treated with activators, 12 Class II Division 1 patients treated with Twin-block appliances, and 12 controls with normal profiles treated without functional appliances were presented in pairs to 10 orthodontists, 10 patients, 10 parents, and 10 laypersons. The raters assessed changes in facial appearance on a visual analog scale. Two-way multivariate analysis of variance was used to evaluate differences among group ratings.
Intrarater reliability was strong in most cases (intraclass correlation coefficients, >0.7). The internal consistency of the assessments was high (alpha, >0.87), both within and between groups. The raters consistently perceived more positive changes in the Class II Division 1 groups compared with the control group. However, this difference hardly exceeded 1/10th of the total visual analog scale length in its highest value and was mostly evident in the lower face and chin. No significant differences were found between the activator and the Twin-block groups.
Although the raters perceived improvements of the facial profiles after functional orthopedic treatment followed by fixed orthodontic appliances, these were quite limited. Thus, orthodontists should be tentative when predicting significant improvement of a patient's profile with this treatment option.
本研究旨在调查经功能性矫形治疗后再使用固定正畸矫治器的安氏II类1分类凸面型患者所察觉到的面部变化。
将12例使用肌激动器治疗的安氏II类1分类患者、12例使用双阻板矫治器治疗的安氏II类1分类患者以及12例未使用功能性矫治器的正常侧貌对照患者的治疗前和治疗后的侧面照片成对展示给10名正畸医生、10名患者、10名家长和10名普通民众。评分者使用视觉模拟量表评估面部外观的变化。采用双向多变量方差分析来评估组间评分的差异。
在大多数情况下,评分者内信度较强(组内相关系数>0.7)。组内和组间评估的内部一致性较高(α>0.87)。与对照组相比,评分者一致认为安氏II类1分类组有更积极的变化。然而,这种差异在其最高值时几乎未超过视觉模拟量表总长度的1/10,且主要在下半面部和下巴处明显。肌激动器组和双阻板组之间未发现显著差异。
尽管评分者察觉到经功能性矫形治疗后再使用固定正畸矫治器可改善面部侧貌,但改善程度相当有限。因此,正畸医生在预测采用这种治疗方案能显著改善患者侧貌时应持谨慎态度。