Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
J Clin Anesth. 2017 Sep;41:106-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
At our hospital, although >90% of nulliparous parturients eventually choose epidural analgesia for labor, many delay its initiation, experiencing considerable pain in the interim. This survey probed parturients' views about the timing of initiation of epidural labor analgesia.
Single-center, nonrandomized quantitative survey.
Labor and delivery suite in a large tertiary academic medical center.
Two hundred laboring nulliparous women admitted to the labor and delivery suite.
After their pain was relieved, parturients completed a questionnaire regarding their decision to request labor epidural analgesia.
A variety of factors regarding epidural use were assessed including the influence of painful contractions and of childbirth education class attendance on the decision to request epidural analgesia, and parturients' perception of the timing of epidural initiation on the progress and outcome of labor.
Analysis revealed that the desire of parturients to use epidural analgesia was increased from 27.9% before the onset of painful contractions to 48.2% after (p<0.01). Two-thirds of participants attended a non-physician taught childbirth education class. An antepartum plan to definitely forgo an epidural was 1.8 times more likely among women who attended a childbirth class when compared to those who did not attend. (OR=1.8; 95%CI:1.1-3.1; p=0.04). The most common views affecting decision-making were that epidural analgesia should not be administered "too early" (67.5%), and that it would slow labor (68.5%). Both of these views were more likely to be held if the parturient had attended a childbirth class, OR=2.0 (95%CI:1.1-3.8; p=0.03) and OR=2.0 (95% CI: 1.1 to 3.7; p=0.03), respectively.
We found that nulliparous parturients have misconceptions about epidurals, which are not supported by evidence-based medicine. Moreover, we found that attendance at childbirth education classes was associated with believing these misconceptions.
在我院,尽管 90%以上的初产妇最终选择硬膜外分娩镇痛,但许多产妇会延迟镇痛的启动,在此期间经历相当大的疼痛。本调查探讨了产妇对硬膜外分娩镇痛启动时机的看法。
单中心、非随机定量调查。
大型三级学术医疗中心的产房和分娩室。
200 名进入产房和分娩室的初产妇。
在疼痛缓解后,产妇完成了一份关于要求分娩硬膜外镇痛的决定的问卷。
评估了与硬膜外使用相关的各种因素,包括疼痛宫缩和分娩教育课程参与对要求硬膜外镇痛的决定的影响,以及产妇对硬膜外启动时机对分娩进展和结局的看法。
分析显示,产妇使用硬膜外镇痛的意愿从宫缩开始前的 27.9%增加到宫缩开始后的 48.2%(p<0.01)。三分之二的参与者参加了非医师授课的分娩教育课程。与未参加分娩课程的女性相比,参加分娩课程的女性更有可能在产前制定明确不使用硬膜外的计划,其几率为 1.8 倍(OR=1.8;95%CI:1.1-3.1;p=0.04)。影响决策的最常见观点是硬膜外镇痛不应该“太早”给药(67.5%),并且会减缓分娩(68.5%)。如果产妇参加了分娩课程,这两种观点更有可能被认同,OR=2.0(95%CI:1.1-3.8;p=0.03)和 OR=2.0(95%CI:1.1-3.7;p=0.03)。
我们发现初产妇对硬膜外有误解,这些误解没有得到循证医学的支持。此外,我们发现参加分娩教育课程与相信这些误解有关。