Bonnet Marie-Pierre, Prunet Caroline, Baillard Christophe, Kpéa Laure, Blondel Béatrice, Le Ray Camille
From the *Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hôpital Cochin, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre, AP-HP, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France; †Inserm UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (Epopé), Center for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; ‡DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris, France; and §Port Royal Maternity, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre, AP-HP, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):109-116. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000517.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The effectiveness of labor epidural analgesia is difficult to explore, as it includes the maternal satisfaction with analgesia as well as the overall childbirth experience. In this population-based study, we sought to identify factors associated with the effectiveness of epidural analgesia for labor pain relief. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of the 2010 French National Perinatal Survey, a cross-sectional study of a representative sample of births in France. All participants who gave birth with an epidural analgesia were included. Effectiveness of epidural analgesia was assessed 2 to 3 days after delivery and intended to include analgesic efficacy and maternal satisfaction together. The factors analyzed were anesthetic management and maternal, obstetrical, and organizational characteristics, using a logistic regression with random effects model. RESULTS: Among the 9337 women who gave birth with an epidural analgesia and were included, 8377 (89.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 88.7-89.9) considered their epidural to be very or fairly effective. In the multivariate analysis, effectiveness was significantly associated with the use of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.2 [1.0-1.5]; P = 0.02) and delivery in private maternity facilities (aOR = 1.3 [1.1-1.6]); it was significantly less effective in obese women (aOR = 0.6 [0.5-0.8]) and multiparous women not receiving oxytocin during labor (aOR = 0.4 [0.4-0.6]) as compared with nonobese and nulliparous women with oxytocin, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: At the population level, most women found epidural analgesia effective for labor pain relief, but specific attention should be paid to obese parturients and multiparous women not receiving oxytocin. High epidural effectiveness with patient-controlled analgesia should promote an increased use of this method.
背景与目的:分娩硬膜外镇痛的效果难以探究,因为它包括产妇对镇痛的满意度以及整体分娩体验。在这项基于人群的研究中,我们试图确定与硬膜外镇痛缓解分娩疼痛效果相关的因素。 方法:我们对2010年法国全国围产期调查进行了二次分析,这是一项对法国有代表性的分娩样本进行的横断面研究。纳入所有采用硬膜外镇痛分娩的参与者。在分娩后2至3天评估硬膜外镇痛的效果,旨在综合评估镇痛效果和产妇满意度。使用随机效应模型的逻辑回归分析的因素包括麻醉管理以及产妇、产科和组织特征。 结果:在纳入的9337例采用硬膜外镇痛分娩的女性中,8377例(89.3%;95%置信区间[CI]=88.7-89.9)认为她们的硬膜外镇痛非常有效或相当有效。在多变量分析中,效果与使用患者自控硬膜外镇痛显著相关(调整优势比[aOR]=1.2[1.0-1.5];P=0.02)以及在私立产科机构分娩(aOR=1.3[1.1-1.6]);与非肥胖且分娩时使用缩宫素的初产妇相比,肥胖女性(aOR=0.6[0.5-0.8])和分娩时未接受缩宫素的经产妇硬膜外镇痛效果显著较差(aOR=0.4[0.4-0.6])。 结论:在人群层面,大多数女性认为硬膜外镇痛对缓解分娩疼痛有效,但应特别关注肥胖产妇和未接受缩宫素的经产妇。患者自控镇痛的高硬膜外效果应促使增加这种方法的使用。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012-8-20
J Clin Anesth. 2017-6-23
Local Reg Anesth. 2021-2-16