Novick Diego, Montgomery William, Treuer Tamas, Koyanagi Ai, Aguado Jaume, Kraemer Susanne, Haro Josep Maria
Global Patient Outcomes and Real World Evidence (GPORWE), Eli Lilly and Company, Windlesham, Surrey, UK.
Global Patient Outcomes and Real World Evidence (GPORWE), Eli Lilly Australia Pty Ltd, West Ryde, Australia.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Jun 6;11:1019-1025. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S124581. eCollection 2017.
Medication nonadherence is common in the treatment of patients with severe mental illness and is a frequent cause of relapse. Different formulations have been developed in an effort to improve medication adherence. The aim of this study was to explore whether there are differential clinical outcomes between two different formulations of olanzapine (orodispersible tablets [ODTs] vs standard oral tablets [SOT]) for the treatment of nonadherent patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.
Data for this analysis were from an observational study conducted in Europe (N=903). Adult schizophrenia and bipolar disorder patients in outpatient settings who initiated or changed to either olanzapine ODT or SOT according to physician decision within the last 45 days were eligible for enrollment. The follow-up period was 1 year. Of the 903 participants, 266 nonadherent patients (Medication Adherence Rating Scale score 0-4 at baseline) were included in the analysis. Clinical outcomes of interest were: 1) hospitalization and 2) relapse identified by the participating psychiatrist or hospitalization. An adjusted logistic regression model was fitted.
Patients taking ODT had more severe illness at baseline (<0.001) as assessed with the Clinical Global Impression with mean (standard deviation [SD]) scores of ODT 4.63 (1.03) and SOT 4 (1.16). In the regression models adjusted for potential confounders, patients taking ODT had significantly lower odds for hospitalization (odds ratio =0.355; 95% confidence interval =0.13-0.974) and relapse or hospitalization (odds ratio =0.368; 95% confidence interval =0.183-0.739), respectively.
Nonadherent patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder treated with the orodispersible formulation were less likely to be hospitalized or suffer relapse compared to those patients taking the standard oral coated tablets.
药物治疗依从性差在重症精神疾病患者的治疗中很常见,并且是复发的常见原因。人们开发了不同的制剂以努力提高药物治疗依从性。本研究的目的是探讨两种不同剂型的奥氮平(口腔崩解片[ODT]与标准口服片剂[SOT])在治疗不依从的精神分裂症或双相情感障碍患者时是否存在不同的临床结局。
该分析的数据来自在欧洲进行的一项观察性研究(N = 903)。过去45天内根据医生决定开始使用或改用奥氮平ODT或SOT的门诊成年精神分裂症和双相情感障碍患者符合纳入标准。随访期为1年。在903名参与者中,266名不依从患者(基线时药物治疗依从性评定量表评分为0 - 4)被纳入分析。感兴趣的临床结局为:1)住院治疗,以及2)由参与研究的精神科医生确定的复发或住院治疗。拟合了一个调整后的逻辑回归模型。
根据临床总体印象评估,服用ODT的患者在基线时病情更严重(<0.001),ODT组的平均(标准差[SD])评分为4.63(1.03),SOT组为4(1.16)。在针对潜在混杂因素进行调整的回归模型中,服用ODT的患者住院治疗的几率显著较低(比值比 = 0.355;95%置信区间 = 0.13 - 0.974),复发或住院治疗的几率也显著较低(比值比 = 0.368;95%置信区间 = 0.183 - 0.739)。
与服用标准口服包衣片的患者相比,接受口腔崩解剂型治疗的不依从精神分裂症或双相情感障碍患者住院或复发的可能性较小。