• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿立哌唑口崩片治疗中国精神分裂症的成本效果分析。

Cost-effectiveness of aripiprazole orally disintegrating tablets in the treatment of schizophrenia in China.

机构信息

Health Economic Research Institute, Sun Yat-sen University , Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Oct;20(5):549-557. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1807331. Epub 2020 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1080/14737167.2020.1807331
PMID:32757968
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) formulation of antipsychotics is one of the innovative drug delivery systems developed to improve medication adherence. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of aripiprazole ODT vs. aripiprazole standard oral tablet (SOT), as well as olanzapine SOT in China.

METHODS

We developed a discrete event simulation model from government payers' perspective. On the entry, 100,000 patients in each group were simulated for relapse, adverse events, changing adherence level, medication discontinuation, switching or quitting in response to three different medication adherence levels. The model projected quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and treatment costs over a 1-year time horizon. Parameter uncertainties were assessed through sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

The QALYs per patient over 1-year treatment with aripiprazole ODT, aripiprazole SOT, or olanzapine SOT, were 0.7282, 0.7112, and 0.7218, respectively. The corresponding costs were $1,423, $2,215, and $1,493. In both comparisons, aripiprazole ODT was dominant. Compared with aripiprazole SOT and olanzapine SOT, the likelihood of aripiprazole ODT being cost-effective was 99.2% and 69.2%, respectively, using 3 times per capita GDP per QALY as willingness-to-pay threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

The aripiprazole ODT is associated with more QALYs at lower costs compared with both aripiprazole SOT and olanzapine SOT in treating schizophrenia in China.

摘要

背景

口服崩解片(ODT)是一种创新的药物传递系统,旨在提高药物依从性。我们旨在评估阿立哌唑 ODT 与阿立哌唑标准口服片剂(SOT)以及奥氮平 SOT 在我国的成本效益。

方法

我们从政府支付者的角度开发了一个离散事件模拟模型。在进入时,模拟每个组中的 100,000 名患者在三种不同的药物依从性水平下出现复发、不良事件、改变依从性水平、停药、换药或停药。该模型预测了 1 年时间内的质量调整生命年(QALYs)和治疗成本。通过敏感性分析评估参数不确定性。

结果

在 1 年的阿立哌唑 ODT、阿立哌唑 SOT 或奥氮平 SOT 治疗中,每位患者的 QALYs 分别为 0.7282、0.7112 和 0.7218。相应的成本分别为 1,423 美元、2,215 美元和 1,493 美元。在这两种比较中,阿立哌唑 ODT 都是主导的。与阿立哌唑 SOT 和奥氮平 SOT 相比,使用 3 倍人均 GDP 每 QALY 作为支付意愿阈值,阿立哌唑 ODT 的成本效益比分别为 99.2%和 69.2%。

结论

在治疗中国精神分裂症方面,与阿立哌唑 SOT 和奥氮平 SOT 相比,阿立哌唑 ODT 具有更高的 QALYs 和更低的成本。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of aripiprazole orally disintegrating tablets in the treatment of schizophrenia in China.阿立哌唑口崩片治疗中国精神分裂症的成本效果分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Oct;20(5):549-557. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1807331. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
2
Cost-effectiveness of olanzapine in the first-line treatment of schizophrenia in China.奥氮平在中国精神分裂症一线治疗中的成本效益
J Med Econ. 2019 May;22(5):439-446. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1580714. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
3
Cost-effectiveness of several atypical antipsychotics in orally disintegrating tablets compared with standard oral tablets in the treatment of schizophrenia in the United States.几种非典型抗精神病药的口腔崩解片与标准口服片剂在美国治疗精神分裂症的成本效益比较。
J Med Econ. 2012;15(3):531-47. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.662923. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
4
An economic model to understand the cost-effectiveness of olanzapine orally dispersible tablets (ODT) and olanzapine film coated tablets as a group compared with other oral atypical antipsychotics for treating schizophrenia in Morocco.一种经济模型,用于了解在摩洛哥,与其他口服非典型抗精神病药物相比,奥氮平口腔崩解片(ODT)和奥氮平薄膜包衣片作为一组药物治疗精神分裂症的成本效益。
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 18;23(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12991-024-00516-y.
5
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Aripiprazole Once-Monthly for the Treatment of Schizophrenia in the UK.阿立哌唑每月一次治疗英国精神分裂症的成本效益分析。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2015 Dec;18(4):185-200.
6
Comparative cost-effectiveness of amisulpride and olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia in China.比较氨磺必利与奥氮平治疗中国精神分裂症的成本效果。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Jun;20(3):313-320. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1752670. Epub 2020 Apr 26.
7
Cost Effectiveness of Paliperidone Long-Acting Injectable Versus Other Antipsychotics for the Maintenance Treatment of Schizophrenia in France.在法国,帕利哌酮长效注射剂与其他抗精神病药物用于精神分裂症维持治疗的成本效益分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Apr;34(4):363-91. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0348-x.
8
Cost-effectiveness of atypical antipsychotics for the management of schizophrenia in the UK .英国精神分裂症管理中使用非典型抗精神病药物的成本效益分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Nov;24(11):3275-85. doi: 10.1185/03007990802507547. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
9
[Cost-effectiveness analysis of schizophrenic patient care settings: impact of an atypical antipsychotic under long-acting injection formulation].[精神分裂症患者护理环境的成本效益分析:长效注射制剂下非典型抗精神病药物的影响]
Encephale. 2005 Mar-Apr;31(2):235-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82390-5.
10
Weight loss during therapy with olanzapine orally disintegrating tablets: two case reports.使用奥氮平口腔崩解片治疗期间体重减轻:两例病例报告。
Psychiatr Danub. 2009 Mar;21(1):72-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Evaluation of an Orodispersible Tablet Formation for the Delivery of a Hydrophobic Drug.一种用于递送疏水药物的口腔崩解片制剂的研发与评价
Adv Pharmacol Pharm Sci. 2024 Oct 17;2024:7914860. doi: 10.1155/2024/7914860. eCollection 2024.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Aripiprazole Tablets with Sensor versus Oral Atypical Antipsychotics for the Treatment of Schizophrenia Using a Patient-Level Microsimulation Modeling Approach.采用患者水平微观模拟建模方法比较阿立哌唑口溶膜片与口服非典型抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症的成本效益
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 May 22;15:375-386. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S396806. eCollection 2023.
3
Formulation and Quality Control of Orally Disintegrating Tablets (ODTs): Recent Advances and Perspectives.
口服速崩片(ODTs)的制剂与质量控制:最新进展与展望。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Dec 24;2021:6618934. doi: 10.1155/2021/6618934. eCollection 2021.
4
A Systematic Review of Methods and Study Quality of Economic Evaluations for the Treatment of Schizophrenia.精神分裂症治疗经济评估方法与研究质量的系统评价
Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 20;9:689123. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.689123. eCollection 2021.