• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

气候、土壤还是两者皆有?哪些变量能更好地预测澳大利亚灌木物种的分布?

Climate, soil or both? Which variables are better predictors of the distributions of Australian shrub species?

作者信息

Hageer Yasmin, Esperón-Rodríguez Manuel, Baumgartner John B, Beaumont Linda J

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2017 Jun 22;5:e3446. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3446. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.3446
PMID:28652933
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5483041/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shrubs play a key role in biogeochemical cycles, prevent soil and water erosion, provide forage for livestock, and are a source of food, wood and non-wood products. However, despite their ecological and societal importance, the influence of different environmental variables on shrub distributions remains unclear. We evaluated the influence of climate and soil characteristics, and whether including soil variables improved the performance of a species distribution model (SDM), Maxent.

METHODS

This study assessed variation in predictions of environmental suitability for 29 Australian shrub species (representing dominant members of six shrubland classes) due to the use of alternative sets of predictor variables. Models were calibrated with (1) climate variables only, (2) climate and soil variables, and (3) soil variables only.

RESULTS

The predictive power of SDMs differed substantially across species, but generally models calibrated with both climate and soil data performed better than those calibrated only with climate variables. Models calibrated solely with soil variables were the least accurate. We found regional differences in potential shrub species richness across Australia due to the use of different sets of variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides evidence that predicted patterns of species richness may be sensitive to the choice of predictor set when multiple, plausible alternatives exist, and demonstrates the importance of considering soil properties when modeling availability of habitat for plants.

摘要

背景

灌木在生物地球化学循环中发挥着关键作用,可防止水土流失,为牲畜提供饲料,并且是食物、木材和非木材产品的来源。然而,尽管它们具有生态和社会重要性,但不同环境变量对灌木分布的影响仍不明确。我们评估了气候和土壤特征的影响,以及纳入土壤变量是否能提高物种分布模型(SDM)Maxent的性能。

方法

本研究评估了由于使用不同的预测变量集,29种澳大利亚灌木物种(代表六个灌木地类别的优势成员)的环境适宜性预测的变化。模型分别用(1)仅气候变量、(2)气候和土壤变量以及(3)仅土壤变量进行校准。

结果

SDM的预测能力在不同物种间差异很大,但一般来说,用气候和土壤数据校准的模型比仅用气候变量校准的模型表现更好。仅用土壤变量校准的模型最不准确。由于使用了不同的变量集,我们发现澳大利亚潜在灌木物种丰富度存在区域差异。

结论

我们的研究提供了证据,表明当存在多种合理的替代方案时,预测的物种丰富度模式可能对预测变量集的选择敏感,并证明了在为植物栖息地可用性建模时考虑土壤特性的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eb1/5483041/70c6d8072742/peerj-05-3446-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eb1/5483041/41821d31bab6/peerj-05-3446-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eb1/5483041/07c83f4271d0/peerj-05-3446-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eb1/5483041/70c6d8072742/peerj-05-3446-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eb1/5483041/41821d31bab6/peerj-05-3446-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eb1/5483041/07c83f4271d0/peerj-05-3446-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eb1/5483041/70c6d8072742/peerj-05-3446-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Climate, soil or both? Which variables are better predictors of the distributions of Australian shrub species?气候、土壤还是两者皆有?哪些变量能更好地预测澳大利亚灌木物种的分布?
PeerJ. 2017 Jun 22;5:e3446. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3446. eCollection 2017.
2
Testing projected wild bee distributions in agricultural habitats: predictive power depends on species traits and habitat type.测试农业栖息地中野生蜜蜂的预测分布:预测能力取决于物种特征和栖息地类型。
Ecol Evol. 2015 Sep 23;5(19):4426-36. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1579. eCollection 2015 Oct.
3
Temporally stacked bee forage species distribution modeling for flower abundance mapping.用于花朵丰度制图的时间堆叠蜜蜂觅食物种分布建模。
MethodsX. 2023 Aug 17;11:102327. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102327. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Contemporary Remotely Sensed Data Products Refine Invasive Plants Risk Mapping in Data Poor Regions.当代遥感数据产品优化了数据匮乏地区的入侵植物风险地图绘制。
Front Plant Sci. 2017 May 15;8:770. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00770. eCollection 2017.
5
Habitat availability and gene flow influence diverging local population trajectories under scenarios of climate change: a place-based approach.在气候变化情景下,栖息地可用性和基因流动影响着不同地方种群的发展轨迹:一种基于地点的方法。
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Apr;22(4):1572-84. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13189. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
6
Shrub encroachment and climate change increase the exposure to drought of Mediterranean wood-pastures.灌丛扩张和气候变化增加了地中海林地草原遭受干旱的风险。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 10;660:550-558. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.029. Epub 2019 Jan 5.
7
Ground Validation Reveals Limited Applicability of Species Distribution Models for Dakota Skipper (Hesperia dacotae, Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) Recovery Efforts in Canada.地面验证表明物种分布模型在加拿大达科他飞蛾(鳞翅目:凤蝶科)恢复工作中的应用有限。
Environ Entomol. 2022 Dec 16;51(6):1249-1261. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvac084.
8
The relative contribution of short-term versus long-term effects in shrub-understory species interactions under arid conditions.干旱条件下灌木下层物种相互作用中短期效应与长期效应的相对贡献。
Oecologia. 2016 Feb;180(2):529-42. doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3482-4. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
9
Soil properties constrain predicted poleward migration of plants under climate change.土壤特性限制了气候变化下植物预测的向极迁移。
New Phytol. 2024 Jan;241(1):131-141. doi: 10.1111/nph.19164. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
10
Data representing climate-induced changes in the spatial distribution of key bee forage species for southwest Western Australia.代表气候导致的西澳大利亚西南部关键蜜蜂觅食物种空间分布变化的数据。
Data Brief. 2022 Nov 25;46:108783. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108783. eCollection 2023 Feb.

引用本文的文献

1
Niche Dynamics of Alien Plant Species in Mediterranean Europe.地中海欧洲外来植物物种的生态位动态
Glob Chang Biol. 2025 Aug;31(8):e70379. doi: 10.1111/gcb.70379.
2
Pedology and Plant Provenance Can Improve Species Distribution Predictions of Australian Native Flora: A Calibrated and Validated Modeling Exercise on 5033 Species.土壤学和植物种源可改善澳大利亚本土植物区系的物种分布预测:对5033个物种进行的校准和验证建模实践
Ecol Evol. 2025 Jun 24;15(6):e71430. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71430. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Distribution, species richness, and relative importance of different plant life forms across drylands in China.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models.预测物种分布:提供的不仅仅是简单的栖息地模型。
Ecol Lett. 2005 Sep;8(9):993-1009. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x. Epub 2005 Jun 23.
2
THE EFFECTS OF SOIL TEMPERATURE ON PLANT GROWTH, NODULATION AND NITROGEN FIXATION IN CASUARINA CUNNINGHAMIANA MIQ.土壤温度对细叶桉植物生长、结瘤和固氮的影响
New Phytol. 1985 Nov;101(3):441-450. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1985.tb02850.x.
3
SDMtoolbox 2.0: the next generation Python-based GIS toolkit for landscape genetic, biogeographic and species distribution model analyses.
中国干旱地区不同植物生活型的分布、物种丰富度及相对重要性。
Plant Divers. 2024 Sep 18;47(2):273-281. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2024.09.007. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Identifying Suitable Regions for Cultivation Without Damage from the Pest .确定不受害虫侵害的适宜种植区域。
Plants (Basel). 2025 Feb 22;14(5):674. doi: 10.3390/plants14050674.
5
Pattern of Diversity and Prediction of Suitable Areas of Grasshoppers from the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in China (Orthoptera: Acridoidea).中国青藏高原蝗虫的多样性模式及适生区预测(直翅目:蝗总科)
Insects. 2025 Feb 10;16(2):191. doi: 10.3390/insects16020191.
6
Population isolation in the Plains spadefoot toad: causes and conservation implications.平原锄足蟾的种群隔离:原因与保护意义。
PeerJ. 2024 Oct 7;12:e17968. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17968. eCollection 2024.
7
Habitat suitability maps for Australian flora and fauna under CMIP6 climate scenarios.CMIP6 气候情景下澳大利亚动植物生境适宜性地图。
Gigascience. 2024 Jan 2;13. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giae002.
8
Potentially suitable habitats of goji berry in China under climate change.气候变化下中国枸杞潜在适宜栖息地
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Jan 9;14:1279019. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1279019. eCollection 2023.
9
Understanding non-stationarity of hydroclimatic extremes and resilience in Peninsular catchments, India.了解印度半岛流域水文气候极端事件的非平稳性和恢复力。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 2;13(1):12524. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38771-w.
10
Ecological Niche Model of Group Isolates Containing a Homologue of the pXO1 Anthrax Toxin Genes Infecting Metalworkers in the United States.美国感染金属工人的含有pXO1炭疽毒素基因同源物的群体分离株的生态位模型
Pathogens. 2022 Apr 14;11(4):470. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11040470.
SDMtoolbox 2.0:用于景观遗传学、生物地理学和物种分布模型分析的新一代基于Python的地理信息系统工具包。
PeerJ. 2017 Dec 5;5:e4095. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4095. eCollection 2017.
4
Climate and geochemistry as drivers of eucalypt diversification in Australia.气候与地球化学作为澳大利亚桉树多样化的驱动因素
Geobiology. 2017 May;15(3):427-440. doi: 10.1111/gbi.12235. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
5
Biodiversity scenarios neglect future land-use changes.生物多样性情景忽略了未来的土地利用变化。
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Jul;22(7):2505-15. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13272. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
6
Enhanced precipitation variability decreases grass- and increases shrub-productivity.降水变率增强会降低草本植物生产力并提高灌木生产力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 13;112(41):12735-40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1506433112. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
7
Projected land-use change impacts on ecosystem services in the United States.预测美国土地利用变化对生态系统服务的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 20;111(20):7492-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405557111. Epub 2014 May 5.
8
Species distributions in response to individual soil nutrients and seasonal drought across a community of tropical trees.物种分布对热带树木群落中单个土壤养分和季节性干旱的响应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Mar 26;110(13):5064-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218042110. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
9
Potential distribution of an invasive species under climate change scenarios using CLIMEX and soil drainage: a case study of Lantana camara L. in Queensland, Australia.利用 CLIMEX 和土壤排水模型预测入侵物种在气候变化情景下的潜在分布:以澳大利亚昆士兰州马缨丹为例。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Jan 15;114:414-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.039. Epub 2012 Nov 17.
10
Comparing soil organic carbon dynamics in perennial grasses and shrubs in a saline-alkaline arid region, northwestern China.比较中国西北地区盐碱性干旱地区多年生草本植物和灌木的土壤有机碳动态。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042927. Epub 2012 Aug 10.