Lu Fengchun, Soares Kevin C, He Jin, Javed Ammar A, Cameron John L, Rezaee Neda, Pawlik Timothy M, Wolfgang Christopher L, Weiss Matthew J
Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China.
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2017 Jun;6(3):144-153. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2016.08.06.
Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are frequently referred to tertiary centers after unsuccessful attempted resections at other institutions. The outcome of these patients who are ultimately resected is not well understood.
We performed a retrospective review of patients with PDAC who underwent re-exploration between 1995 and 2013 at a single high volume tertiary care institution. We aimed to evaluate the association of neoadjuvant therapy prior to re-exploration on pathologic findings and clinical outcome in previously explored patients with PDAC.
Between 1995 and 2013, 50 of the 2,062 patients who were surgically explored underwent pancreatic resection following a previous exploration where they were deemed unresectable. The most common reason for unresectability at initial operation was vascular invasion (80%) and a presumed R2 resection. Thirty-seven (74%) patients received neoadjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy was associated with improved TNM stage (P=0.002), fewer positive lymph nodes (0 2, P=0.025), and improved median survival (24 13 months, P=0.044). Compared to R2 resected patients with PDAC who had not previously been explored, re-explored patients had significantly lower pathologic T and N stages (P<0.001) and a longer median survival (19 10 months, P<0.001).
Patients with PDAC deemed unresectable may warrant re-exploration. Treatment with neoadjuvant therapy between operations is associated with improved pathological stage and survival. In this highly selected group of patients, successful resection is associated with improved survival compared to R2 resections.
胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者在其他机构尝试切除失败后,常被转诊至三级医疗中心。这些最终接受切除手术的患者的预后情况尚不清楚。
我们对1995年至2013年间在一家大型三级医疗机构接受再次探查的PDAC患者进行了回顾性研究。我们旨在评估再次探查前新辅助治疗与既往接受探查的PDAC患者的病理结果及临床预后之间的关联。
1995年至2013年间,2062例接受手术探查的患者中有50例在先前被判定无法切除后接受了胰腺切除术。初次手术无法切除的最常见原因是血管侵犯(80%)以及推测为R2切除。37例(74%)患者接受了新辅助治疗。新辅助治疗与TNM分期改善(P=0.002)、阳性淋巴结减少(0对2,P=0.025)以及中位生存期延长(24对13个月,P=0.044)相关。与先前未接受探查的R2切除的PDAC患者相比,接受再次探查的患者病理T和N分期显著更低(P<0.001),中位生存期更长(19对10个月,P<0.001)。
被判定无法切除的PDAC患者可能值得再次探查。手术期间进行新辅助治疗与病理分期改善及生存期延长相关。在这一经过高度筛选的患者群体中,与R2切除相比,成功切除与生存期改善相关。