Miller Mollie E, Tidey Jennifer W, Rohsenow Damaris J, Higgins Stephen T
Postdoctoral Research Associate, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI.
Professor, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI.
Tob Regul Sci. 2017 Jan;3(1):108-114. doi: 10.18001/TRS.3.1.11.
Very few studies have evaluated perceptions of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) among smokers with mental illness. This study assessed expectancies about the effects of smoking combustible cigarettes or using ENDS among current smokers with and without severe psychological distress (SPD).
We used a crowdsourcing system to survey 268 smokers on their expectancies for the effects of combustible cigarettes and ENDS. Positive expectancies assessed included negative affect reduction, stimulation, positive social effects and weight control, and negative expectancies included negative physical effects, negative psychosocial effects and future health concerns.
Smokers with SPD had higher positive expectancies for weight control and social effects of both products compared to those without such distress, and higher expectancies for stimulation from combustible cigarettes compared to ENDS. All participants had significantly lower negative expectancies for ENDS compared to combustible cigarettes, with no significant differences between the groups.
Smokers with SPD may be more vulnerable toward ENDS use, as they are for combustible cigarette use, due to greater positive expectancies of the products. Challenging positive expectancies may increase the efficacy of tobacco control efforts in this vulnerable population.
极少有研究评估患有精神疾病的吸烟者对电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)的认知。本研究评估了目前有和没有严重心理困扰(SPD)的吸烟者对吸传统香烟或使用ENDS效果的预期。
我们使用众包系统对268名吸烟者进行调查,了解他们对传统香烟和ENDS效果的预期。评估的积极预期包括减轻负面影响、刺激、积极的社会影响和体重控制,消极预期包括负面身体影响、负面心理社会影响和对未来健康的担忧。
与没有此类困扰的吸烟者相比,患有SPD的吸烟者对这两种产品的体重控制和社会影响有更高的积极预期,且与ENDS相比,对传统香烟的刺激有更高的预期。与传统香烟相比,所有参与者对ENDS的消极预期都显著更低,两组之间无显著差异。
患有SPD的吸烟者可能由于对这些产品有更高的积极预期,而与吸传统香烟一样,更容易使用ENDS。挑战积极预期可能会提高针对这一弱势群体的控烟努力的成效。