Linek P
Department of Kinesitherapy and Special Methods in Physiotherapy, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland.
Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2018;77(1):123-130. doi: 10.5603/FM.a2017.0059. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
Some studies have not considered body mass as a confounder in analysis of oblique abdominis muscles (OAM) (including the oblique externus [OE] and oblique internus [OI]), which may have led to improper interpretation of results. To assess the differences in the effect of age, gender, and physical activity between normalised for body mass and actual values of the OAM as well as to establish the effect of age, gender, and physical activity on normalised for body mass OAM thicknesses in adolescents. A real-time ultrasound was used to obtain images of the OAM. Body mass normalisation for OAM thicknesses was performed with allometric scaling and the following equations: Allometric-scaled OE = OE thickness/body mass0.88; Allometric-scaled OI = OI thickness/body mass0.72. Analysis showed that boys have significantly thicker OAM than girls, and those who practise sports have thicker OAM than non-active individuals. For allometric-scaled OAM, there was only a significant gender effect, where boys have thicker allometric-scaled OAM than girls. There was a significant correlation between participants' age and the actual value of the OAM. The correlations between age and allometric-scaled OAM were insignificant. An analysis of OAM without body mass normalisation can lead to improper interpretation of study results. Thus, future studies should analyse OE and OI thickness measurements after normalisation rather than actual values. In the adolescent population, there is no effect of age and physical activity on allometric-scaled OAM; males have thicker allometric-scaled OAM than females. (Folia Morphol 2018; 77, 1: 123-130).
一些研究在分析腹外斜肌(OAM)(包括腹外斜肌[OE]和腹内斜肌[OI])时未将体重视为混杂因素,这可能导致对结果的解读不当。旨在评估体重标准化后的OAM与实际值在年龄、性别和身体活动影响方面的差异,并确定年龄、性别和身体活动对青少年体重标准化后的OAM厚度的影响。使用实时超声获取OAM的图像。通过异速生长缩放和以下公式对OAM厚度进行体重标准化:异速生长缩放后的OE = OE厚度/体重^0.88;异速生长缩放后的OI = OI厚度/体重^0.72。分析表明,男孩的OAM明显比女孩厚,且从事运动的人的OAM比不运动的人厚。对于异速生长缩放后的OAM,仅存在显著的性别效应,即男孩的异速生长缩放后的OAM比女孩厚。参与者的年龄与OAM的实际值之间存在显著相关性。年龄与异速生长缩放后的OAM之间的相关性不显著。对未进行体重标准化的OAM进行分析可能会导致对研究结果的解读不当。因此,未来的研究应分析标准化后的OE和OI厚度测量值而非实际值。在青少年人群中,年龄和身体活动对异速生长缩放后的OAM没有影响;男性的异速生长缩放后的OAM比女性厚。(《形态学杂志》2018年;77卷,第1期:123 - 130页)