Suppr超能文献

有慢性颈部疼痛和无慢性颈部疼痛女性的颈部肌肉剪切模量标准化评估

Assessment of Neck Muscle Shear Modulus Normalization in Women with and without Chronic Neck Pain.

作者信息

Dieterich Angela V, Yavuz Utku Şükrü, Petzke Frank, Nordez Antoine

机构信息

Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health, Security, Society, Furtwangen University, 78120 Furtwangen im Schwarzwald, Germany.

Biomedical Signals and Systems, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jul 23;12(8):1791. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12081791.

Abstract

Identifying the objective stiffness of the neck muscles facilitates the early and specific diagnosis of neck pain and targeted therapy. However, individual variation in the muscle shear modulus obscures differences between healthy and diseased individuals. Normalization may improve the comparability between individuals. The shear modulus at different functional tasks served as a reference for normalizing the neck muscles' shear modulus of 38 women, 20 with chronic neck pain and 18 asymptomatic. Reference tasks were , , , . The effects of normalization on within-group variation and between-group differences were compared. Normalization with was discarded due to imaging problems. Normalization with , , , and reduced within-group variation, by 23.2%, 26.8%, 11.6%, and 33.6%, respectively. All four normalization approaches reduced the -values when testing for between-group differences. For the pain group, normalization with and indicated less normalized muscle stiffness, while normalization with and indicated higher stiffness. The contradictory results are explainable by non-significant group differences in the reference tasks. Normalization of the muscle shear modulus is effective to reduce within-group variation, but a trustworthy normalization approach for group comparisons has yet to be identified.

摘要

识别颈部肌肉的客观僵硬度有助于颈部疼痛的早期特异性诊断和靶向治疗。然而,肌肉剪切模量的个体差异掩盖了健康个体与患病个体之间的差异。标准化可能会提高个体之间的可比性。不同功能任务下的剪切模量作为38名女性颈部肌肉剪切模量标准化的参考,其中20名患有慢性颈部疼痛,18名无症状。参考任务为 , , , 。比较了标准化对组内变异和组间差异的影响。由于成像问题,使用 进行的标准化被舍弃。使用 、 、 和 进行标准化分别使组内变异减少了23.2%、26.8%、11.6%和33.6%。在检验组间差异时,所有四种标准化方法都降低了 -值。对于疼痛组,使用 和 进行标准化表明肌肉僵硬度标准化程度较低,而使用 和 进行标准化表明僵硬度较高。这些矛盾的结果可以通过参考任务中不显著的组间差异来解释。肌肉剪切模量的标准化有效地减少了组内变异,但尚未确定一种可靠的用于组间比较的标准化方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2400/9331943/483eb4401249/diagnostics-12-01791-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验