• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症幸存者与慢性癌症患者:治疗相关影响、后续护理及幸存者护理计划使用模式

Survivorship and the chronic cancer patient: Patterns in treatment-related effects, follow-up care, and use of survivorship care plans.

作者信息

Frick Melissa A, Vachani Carolyn C, Bach Christina, Hampshire Margaret K, Arnold-Korzeniowski Karen, Metz James M, Hill-Kayser Christine E

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Cancer. 2017 Nov 1;123(21):4268-4276. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30862. Epub 2017 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.30862
PMID:28654153
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The survivorship needs of patients living with chronic cancer (CC) and their use of survivorship care plans (SCPs) have been overlooked and underappreciated.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 39,088 SCPs completed for cancer survivors with an Internet-based SCP tool was examined; it included 5847 CC survivors (15%; CC was defined as chronic leukemia and/or recurrent/metastatic cancer of another nature). Patient-reported treatment effects and follow-up care patterns were compared between CC survivors and survivors treated with curative intent (CI). Responses from a follow-up survey regarding SCP satisfaction and use were reviewed.

RESULTS

CC survivors had greater odds of experiencing multiple treatment-related effects than survivors treated with CI; these effects included fatigue, cognitive changes, dyspnea, peripheral neuropathy, lymphedema, and erectile dysfunction. Nearly half of CC survivors were managed by an oncologist alone, and they were less likely than CI patients to be comanaged by a primary care provider and an oncologist. Fewer SCPs were generated by health care providers (HCPs) for CC survivors versus CI survivors. A smaller proportion of CC users versus CI users rated their experience and satisfaction with the SCP tool as very good or excellent, and CC users were less likely to share the HCP summary with their health care team.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial number of CC survivors, often considered incurable but treatable, seek survivorship support. Tools to facilitate participation, communication, and coordination of care are valuable for these patients, and future iterations of SCPs should be designed to address the particular circumstances of living with CC. Cancer 2017;123:4268-4276. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

摘要

背景

慢性癌症(CC)患者的生存需求及其对生存护理计划(SCP)的使用一直被忽视和低估。

方法

对通过基于互联网的SCP工具为癌症幸存者完成的39088份SCP的便利样本进行了检查;其中包括5847名CC幸存者(15%;CC被定义为慢性白血病和/或其他类型的复发性/转移性癌症)。比较了CC幸存者与接受根治性治疗(CI)的幸存者之间患者报告的治疗效果和后续护理模式。审查了关于SCP满意度和使用情况的随访调查的回复。

结果

与接受CI治疗的幸存者相比,CC幸存者经历多种与治疗相关影响的几率更高;这些影响包括疲劳、认知改变、呼吸困难、周围神经病变、淋巴水肿和勃起功能障碍。近一半的CC幸存者仅由肿瘤学家管理,与CI患者相比,他们由初级保健提供者和肿瘤学家共同管理的可能性较小。与CI幸存者相比,医疗保健提供者(HCP)为CC幸存者生成的SCP较少。与CI用户相比,CC用户中认为他们对SCP工具的体验和满意度非常好或优秀的比例较小,并且CC用户与他们的医疗团队分享HCP总结的可能性较小。

结论

大量CC幸存者,通常被认为无法治愈但可治疗,寻求生存支持。促进参与、沟通和护理协调的工具对这些患者很有价值,SCP的未来版本应设计用于解决CC患者的特殊情况。《癌症》2017年;123:4268 - 4276。©2017美国癌症协会。

相似文献

1
Survivorship and the chronic cancer patient: Patterns in treatment-related effects, follow-up care, and use of survivorship care plans.癌症幸存者与慢性癌症患者:治疗相关影响、后续护理及幸存者护理计划使用模式
Cancer. 2017 Nov 1;123(21):4268-4276. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30862. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
2
Survivorship after lower gastrointestinal cancer: Patient-reported outcomes and planning for care.下消化道癌患者的生存情况:患者报告的结局及护理规划
Cancer. 2017 May 15;123(10):1860-1868. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30527. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
3
Identifying barriers to cancer survivors sharing their survivorship care plans with their healthcare provider.确定癌症幸存者与医疗服务提供者分享生存护理计划的障碍。
J Cancer Surviv. 2018 Oct;12(5):632-638. doi: 10.1007/s11764-018-0699-3. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
4
Outcomes and satisfaction after delivery of a breast cancer survivorship care plan: results of a multicenter trial.乳腺癌生存护理计划实施后的结局与满意度:一项多中心试验的结果
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Mar;11(2):e222-9. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001404.
5
An Assessment to Inform Pediatric Cancer Provider Development and Delivery of Survivor Care Plans.一项为儿科癌症医疗服务提供者制定和提供幸存者护理计划提供参考的评估。
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Dec;30(4):677-84. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0829-9.
6
Impact of internet-based cancer survivorship care plans on health care and lifestyle behaviors.基于互联网的癌症生存者照护计划对医疗保健和生活方式行为的影响。
Cancer. 2013 Nov 1;119(21):3854-60. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28286. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
7
Survivorship after treatment of pancreatic cancer: insights via an Internet-based survivorship care plan tool.胰腺癌治疗后的生存情况:通过基于互联网的生存护理计划工具获得的见解
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017 Oct;8(5):890-896. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2017.08.07.
8
Impact of Survivorship Care Plans and Planning on Breast, Colon, and Prostate Cancer Survivors in a Community Oncology Practice.社区肿瘤医疗实践中生存护理计划及规划对乳腺癌、结肠癌和前列腺癌幸存者的影响
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Apr;35(2):249-255. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1457-y.
9
Patient-Reported Survivorship Care Practices and Late Effects After Treatment of Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.患者报告的霍奇金淋巴瘤和非霍奇金淋巴瘤治疗后的生存护理实践及晚期效应
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018 Dec;2:1-10. doi: 10.1200/CCI.18.00015.
10
Survivorship care planning in skin cancer: An unbiased statistical approach to identifying patterns of care-plan use.皮肤癌的生存护理计划:一种识别护理计划使用模式的无偏统计方法。
Cancer. 2018 Jan 1;124(1):183-191. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30985. Epub 2017 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Do cancer curvivors and metavivors have distinct needs for stress management intervention? Retrospective analysis of a mind-body survivorship program.癌症幸存者和代谢幸存者在压力管理干预方面是否有不同的需求?一项身心康复计划的回顾性分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Oct 6;31(10):616. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08062-1.
2
Clinicians' experiences with cancer patients living longer with incurable cancer: a focus group study in the Netherlands.荷兰的一项焦点小组研究:临床医生对患有无法治愈癌症而存活时间更长的癌症患者的体验。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2023 Apr 28;24:e29. doi: 10.1017/S1463423622000500.
3
Health information technology to support cancer survivorship care planning: A systematic review.
健康信息技术支持癌症生存者照护计划:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Sep 18;28(10):2277-2286. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab134.
4
Experiences of living with chronic myeloid leukaemia and adhering to tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.与慢性髓性白血病共存并坚持使用酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的体验:定性研究的主题综合分析。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Apr;45:101730. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101730. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
5
Strategies for Successful Survivorship Care Plan Implementation: Results From a Qualitative Study.成功实施生存护理计划的策略:一项定性研究的结果。
J Oncol Pract. 2018 Aug;14(8):e462-e483. doi: 10.1200/JOP.17.00054. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
6
Identifying barriers to cancer survivors sharing their survivorship care plans with their healthcare provider.确定癌症幸存者与医疗服务提供者分享生存护理计划的障碍。
J Cancer Surviv. 2018 Oct;12(5):632-638. doi: 10.1007/s11764-018-0699-3. Epub 2018 Jul 3.