Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; and RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.
J Oncol Pract. 2018 Aug;14(8):e462-e483. doi: 10.1200/JOP.17.00054. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
Care for US cancer survivors is often fragmented, contributing to poor health outcomes. Care and outcomes may improve when survivors and follow-up care providers receive survivorship care plans (SCPs), written documents containing information regarding cancer diagnosis, treatment, surveillance plans, and health promotion. However, implementing SCPs is challenging. As such, we sought to identify strategies for successfully implementing SCPs.
We measured SCP implementation using performance data from cancer programs participating in the American Society of Clinical Oncology Quality Oncology Practice Initiative, an oncologist-led quality assessment and improvement program. We used semistructured interviews with cancer program employees (eg, physicians) to identify strategies for successfully implementing SCPs by comparing approaches in cancer programs that, according to Quality Oncology Practice Initiative performance indicators, developed and delivered SCPs to a relatively small proportion of eligible survivors and their follow-up care providers (ie, low performers; n = 6 participants in five programs) with approaches among programs with better performance (ie, moderate performers; n = 15 participants in nine programs).
Ten of 14 cancer programs developed SCPs for ≥ 50% of eligible survivors; two of 14 delivered SCPs to any survivors; and eight of 14 delivered SCPs to ≥ 25% of follow-up care providers. We found that moderate performers proactively addressed SCP requirements, leveraged requirements to improve survivorship care, set internal targets, automated implementation, had active leaders and champions, and tasked appropriate employees with SCP implementation.
SCP implementation remains challenging. We identified strategies for successfully implementing SCPs. Future research should examine how cancer programs have achieved these strategies; findings could contribute to an understanding of the changes needed to implement comprehensive survivorship care.
美国癌症幸存者的护理常常是分散的,这导致了较差的健康结果。当幸存者和后续护理提供者收到生存护理计划(SCP)时,护理和结果可能会得到改善,SCP 是包含有关癌症诊断、治疗、监测计划和健康促进信息的书面文件。然而,实施 SCP 具有挑战性。因此,我们试图确定成功实施 SCP 的策略。
我们使用参与美国临床肿瘤学会质量肿瘤实践倡议的癌症计划的绩效数据来衡量 SCP 的实施情况,该倡议是一个由肿瘤学家领导的质量评估和改进计划。我们通过比较根据质量肿瘤实践倡议绩效指标制定和向相对较少比例的合格幸存者及其后续护理提供者提供 SCP 的癌症计划(即低绩效者;5 个计划中的 6 名参与者)与绩效较好的计划(即中等绩效者;9 个计划中的 15 名参与者)的方法,使用癌症计划员工(例如医生)的半结构化访谈来确定成功实施 SCP 的策略。
在 14 个癌症计划中有 10 个为≥50%的合格幸存者制定了 SCP;在 14 个癌症计划中有 2 个向任何幸存者提供了 SCP;在 14 个癌症计划中有 8 个向≥25%的后续护理提供者提供了 SCP。我们发现,中等绩效者积极应对 SCP 要求,利用要求来改善生存护理,设定内部目标,实现自动化实施,拥有积极的领导人和拥护者,并将 SCP 实施任务分配给适当的员工。
SCP 的实施仍然具有挑战性。我们确定了成功实施 SCP 的策略。未来的研究应该研究癌症计划如何实现这些策略;研究结果可以帮助我们了解实施全面生存护理所需的变革。