Suppr超能文献

术后敷料对腿部切除术的影响:氧化锌加压敷料与标准伤口护理的比较

Effect of Postoperative Dressing on Excisions Performed on the Leg: A Comparison Between Zinc Oxide Compression Dressings Versus Standard Wound Care.

作者信息

Thompson Carol B, Wiemken Timothy L, Brown Timothy S

机构信息

*Division of Dermatology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky; †Computational Epidemiology Unit, Division of Infectious Diseases, Global Health Research Organization, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky; ‡Micrographic Surgery and Dermatologic Oncology Fellowship, Division of Dermatology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.

出版信息

Dermatol Surg. 2017 Nov;43(11):1379-1384. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001209.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Wound healing on the legs may be complicated by delayed healing and other postoperative problems. Two potential postoperative wound care regimens for sutured excisions on the legs include a standard pressure dressing and zinc oxide compression dressings. Limited data exist comparing the efficacy of these 2 options.

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of standard postoperative wound care dressing versus postoperative use of a zinc oxide compression dressings for sutured repairs on the legs.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, healing time and complication rate of 44 patients treated with standard dressing and 36 patients treated with zinc oxide compression dressings were compared.

RESULTS

At 19 days, 91.7% of patients receiving zinc oxide dressing were fully healed, whereas only 65.9% of patients receiving standard wound care were healed. Complications were noted in 6 of the patients receiving standard dressing (13.6%); no complications occurred in the zinc oxide dressing group.

CONCLUSION

Zinc oxide compression dressings were a practical option for postoperative wound care, with decreased incidence of delayed wound healing, and fewer complications versus standard postoperative wound dressing.

摘要

背景

腿部伤口愈合可能会因愈合延迟及其他术后问题而变得复杂。腿部缝合切除术后两种潜在的伤口护理方案包括标准压力敷料和氧化锌加压敷料。比较这两种方案疗效的数据有限。

目的

比较腿部缝合修复术后标准伤口护理敷料与氧化锌加压敷料的使用效果。

方法

在这项回顾性队列研究中,比较了44例接受标准敷料治疗的患者和36例接受氧化锌加压敷料治疗的患者的愈合时间和并发症发生率。

结果

在第19天时,接受氧化锌敷料治疗的患者中有91.7%完全愈合,而接受标准伤口护理的患者中只有65.9%愈合。接受标准敷料治疗的患者中有6例出现并发症(13.6%);氧化锌敷料组未发生并发症。

结论

氧化锌加压敷料是术后伤口护理的一种实用选择,与标准术后伤口敷料相比,伤口愈合延迟的发生率降低,并发症更少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验