Irstea, UR MALY, Centre de Lyon-Villeurbanne, 5 rue de la Doua, BP 32108, 69616 Villeurbanne Cedex, France.
Université de Bordeaux, Environnements et Paléoenvironnements Océaniques et Continentaux (EPOC), UMR 5805 CNRS, Laboratoire de Physico- et Toxico-Chimie de l'environnement (LPTC), 351 cours de la Libération, 33405 Talence, France; CNRS, Environnements et Paléoenvironnements Océaniques et Continentaux (EPOC), UMR 5805 CNRS, Laboratoire de Physico- et Toxico-Chimie de l'environnement (LPTC), 351 cours de la Libération, 33405 Talence, France.
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Dec 15;605-606:38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.111. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
Pools of aquatic plants and benthic invertebrates were collected along with 47 individuals from three cyprinid fish species (Barbus barbus, Gobio gobio, Rutilus rutilus) at a site in the Rhône River (France). Carbon and nitrogen isotopic ratios (δC and δN) and a wide range of per- and poly-fluorinated chemicals (PFASs) were analysed in all samples. The sum of PFAS concentrations (ΣPFAS) increased from aquatic plants to fish dorsal muscles; molecular profiles were dominated by C9-C13 perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs), while perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctane sulfonamide (FOSA) were detected in all samples at lower concentrations. ΣPFAS and especially ΣPFCAs were higher in barbels (B. barbus) than in other species, while roaches (R. rutilus) were less contaminated by PFOS than barbels and gudgeons (G. gobio). Gudgeons accumulated significantly higher FOSA concentrations. Young (small) barbels displayed significantly higher PFOS, perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) and perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) concentrations than did large specimens; conversely, perfluorotetradecanoic acid (PFTeDA) concentrations were significantly higher in large barbels. Multiple linear regressions were performed on the whole set of fish samples with size, mass and isotopic ratios as explicative variables, and several single compounds as explained variables. Regardless of the compound, the regressions did not explain much of the contamination variability. However, adding species as a qualitative variable, i.e. performing analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs) improved the fit greatly, while adding sex did not. Diet (i.e. δC and δN) was the main factor explaining interspecific differences. Biotransformation was assessed by comparing concentration ratios of PFOS or FOSA to their precursors in the food-web compartments. These ratios increased from invertebrates to fish, and differed among fish species, suggesting that biotransformation occurred but was species-specific. Biomagnification factor calculations showed that C11-C13 PFCAs, PFOS and FOSA were apparently biomagnified in barbels and gudgeons.
在法国罗纳河的一个地点,采集了三种鲤科鱼类(巴贝斯鱼、泥鳅、彩虹鳜)和水生植物及底栖无脊椎动物的样本,共 47 条个体。对所有样本进行了碳氮稳定同位素比值(δC 和 δN)和一系列全氟和多氟化合物(PFASs)分析。所有样本中都检测到了全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)和全氟辛烷磺酰胺(FOSA),但浓度较低,而 PFAS 浓度总和(ΣPFAS)则从水生植物到鱼类背肌逐渐增加;分子谱以 C9-C13 全氟羧酸(PFCAs)为主。在所有样本中,PFOS 和 FOSA 的浓度都较低。与其他物种相比,胡须(B. barbus)中的 ΣPFAS 和特别是 ΣPFCAs 更高,而泥鳅(R. rutilus)受 PFOS 污染的程度低于胡须和麦穗鱼(G. gobio)。麦穗鱼积累了明显更高浓度的 FOSA。幼(小)胡须的 PFOS、全氟壬酸(PFNA)和全氟癸酸(PFDA)浓度明显高于大个体,而全氟十四酸(PFTeDA)浓度在大胡须中明显更高。用鱼的大小、质量和同位素比值作为解释变量,对整个鱼类样本进行了多元线性回归,将几种单一化合物作为解释变量。无论化合物如何,回归都不能很好地解释污染物的变异性。然而,将物种作为一个定性变量加入,即进行协方差分析(ANCOVAs),大大提高了拟合度,而加入性别则没有。饮食(即 δC 和 δN)是解释种间差异的主要因素。通过比较食物网各部分中 PFOS 或 FOSA 与其前体的浓度比值来评估生物转化。这些比值从无脊椎动物到鱼类逐渐增加,而且在不同的鱼类物种之间存在差异,这表明发生了生物转化,但具有物种特异性。生物放大因子的计算表明,C11-C13 PFCAs、PFOS 和 FOSA 在胡须和麦穗鱼中明显被生物放大。