Aydoğdu Onur, Sari Zübeyir, Yurdalan S Ufuk, Polat M Gülden
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017 Sep 22;30(5):1045-1051. doi: 10.3233/BMR-169622.
The aim of this study was to compare kinesio taping along with conventional treatment to conventional treatment alone and to report the results of both a single and repetitive kinesio taping application applied on quadriceps femoris and hamstring muscles on pain, range of motion, muscle strength, and functional status in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Fifty-four patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomly allocated to two groups. A total of 28 patients were included in kinesio taping group, others were included in the control group. Before and after intervention, pain was measured with visual analog scale, range of motion was measured with universal goniometer, muscle strength was measured with dynamometer, and functional status was measured with Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score.
There were statistically significant improvements in measures of pain, range of motion, quadriceps muscle strength and functional status between pre- and post-treatment in both groups (p< 0.05). In comparison, there were no significant differences with these parameters between groups (p> 0.05). It was also found that significant difference was observed in terms of range of motion, pain, functional status between pre-treatment and post-taping in intervention group (p< 0.017).
In conclusion, we could report that kinesio taping has significant immediate effects after a single kinesio taping application on range of motion, pain and functional status in patients with knee osteoarthritis. We could also report that KT in addition to conventional treatment is not superior to conventional treatment alone in terms of clinical outcomes over 3 weeks later.
本研究旨在比较肌内效贴布联合传统治疗与单纯传统治疗的效果,并报告对膝关节骨关节炎患者的股四头肌和腘绳肌进行单次及重复肌内效贴布治疗后,在疼痛、活动范围、肌肉力量和功能状态方面的结果。
54例膝关节骨关节炎患者被随机分为两组。肌内效贴布组共纳入28例患者,其余患者纳入对照组。干预前后,采用视觉模拟量表测量疼痛,通用角度计测量活动范围,测力计测量肌肉力量,膝关节损伤骨关节炎结局评分测量功能状态。
两组治疗前后的疼痛、活动范围、股四头肌力量和功能状态测量指标均有统计学意义上的显著改善(p<0.05)。相比之下,两组之间这些参数无显著差异(p>0.05)。还发现干预组治疗前与贴布治疗后在活动范围、疼痛、功能状态方面存在显著差异(p<0.017)。
总之,我们可以报告,单次肌内效贴布治疗后,肌内效贴布对膝关节骨关节炎患者的活动范围、疼痛和功能状态有显著的即时效果。我们还可以报告,在3周后的临床结果方面,肌内效贴布联合传统治疗并不优于单纯传统治疗。