• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[一般实践中小型外科手术使用无菌或非无菌手套的情况]

[Sterile or non-sterile gloves in minor surgical procedures in general practice].

作者信息

Steen Knut

出版信息

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2017 Jun 26;137(12-13):885-889. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.16.0599. Print 2017 Jun 27.

DOI:10.4045/tidsskr.16.0599
PMID:28655267
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minor surgical procedures are regularly performed in general practice. The practice with regard to routine use of sterile or non-sterile gloves varies. The purpose of this article was to review the scientific basis for choice and recommendation in this area.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Medline and Embase for clinical studies in English which had investigated the use of sterile or non-sterile gloves and the prevalence of wound infection related to minor surgery. This applied primarily to general practice, including accident and emergency departments, but also encompassed other fields of medicine. The reference lists for the relevant articles were also scrutinised.

RESULTS

Three randomised prospective studies from general practice were found. These showed no difference in frequency of infection. Two of the studies were of moderately good quality. A further five randomised prospective studies and four observational studies were also found, which had examined the association between the use of sterile or non-sterile gloves and infection related to minor surgery. Common to all of these was that they came from fields of medicine other than general practice, namely dermatology and odontology. No difference was found in the majority of these (six out of nine). However, the scientific quality was low or very low.

INTERPRETATION

The research data on the use of sterile or non-sterile gloves in minor surgery in general practice and the consequences for wound infection are very limited. No clear difference in infection frequency was demonstrated.

摘要

背景

小型外科手术在普通医疗实践中经常进行。关于常规使用无菌或非无菌手套的做法各不相同。本文的目的是回顾该领域选择和推荐的科学依据。

材料与方法

在PubMed、Cochrane、Medline和Embase中检索英文临床研究,这些研究调查了无菌或非无菌手套的使用以及与小型手术相关的伤口感染发生率。这主要适用于普通医疗实践,包括急诊科,但也涵盖其他医学领域。还仔细审查了相关文章的参考文献列表。

结果

发现了三项来自普通医疗实践的随机前瞻性研究。这些研究表明感染频率没有差异。其中两项研究质量中等。还发现了另外五项随机前瞻性研究和四项观察性研究,它们研究了无菌或非无菌手套的使用与小型手术相关感染之间的关联。所有这些研究的共同之处在于它们来自普通医疗实践以外的医学领域,即皮肤科和牙科。在这些研究中的大多数(九项中的六项)未发现差异。然而,科学质量较低或非常低。

解读

关于普通医疗实践中在小型手术中使用无菌或非无菌手套及其对伤口感染影响的研究数据非常有限。未证明感染频率有明显差异。

相似文献

1
[Sterile or non-sterile gloves in minor surgical procedures in general practice].[一般实践中小型外科手术使用无菌或非无菌手套的情况]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2017 Jun 26;137(12-13):885-889. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.16.0599. Print 2017 Jun 27.
2
Comparing non-sterile to sterile gloves for minor surgery: a prospective randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.比较非无菌手套和无菌手套用于小型手术:一项前瞻性随机对照非劣效性试验。
Med J Aust. 2015 Jan 19;202(1):27-31. doi: 10.5694/mja14.00314.
3
Comparison of Sterile vs Nonsterile Gloves in Cutaneous Surgery and Common Outpatient Dental Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.在皮肤外科手术和常见的门诊牙科手术中,无菌手套与非无菌手套的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Sep 1;152(9):1008-14. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.1965.
4
[Sterile gloves are necessary in minor surgery].小型手术中需要无菌手套。
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155(18):A3341.
5
[Sterile gloves are not necessary in minor surgery].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155(18):A2954.
6
Application of Field Sterility to Safely Reduce Cost and Waste in Cleft Surgery.应用现场无菌化以安全降低腭裂手术的成本和浪费。
J Craniofac Surg. 2023 Oct 1;34(7):2008-2011. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009579. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
7
[Sterile or non-sterile gloves in minor surgery?].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2017 Jun 26;137(12-13):851. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.17.0459. Print 2017 Jun 27.
8
Infection rates of wound repairs during Mohs micrographic surgery using sterile versus nonsterile gloves: a prospective randomized pilot study.在 Mohs 显微外科手术中使用无菌手套与非无菌手套修复伤口的感染率:一项前瞻性随机试点研究。
Dermatol Surg. 2011 May;37(5):651-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.01949.x. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
9
Risk of wound infection with use of sterile versus clean gloves in wound repair at the Emergency Department: A systematic review and meta-analysis.在急诊科进行伤口修复时,使用无菌手套与清洁手套的伤口感染风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Injury. 2023 Nov;54(11):111020. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111020. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
10
Sterile versus nonsterile gloves during Mohs micrographic surgery: infection rate is not affected.莫氏显微外科手术中使用无菌手套与非无菌手套:感染率不受影响。
Dermatol Surg. 2006 Feb;32(2):170-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32031.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of post-vasectomy infections in 133,044 vasectomies from four international vasectomy practices.来自四个国际输精管绝育实践的 133044 例输精管绝育术后感染风险。
Int Braz J Urol. 2023 Jul-Aug;49(4):490-500. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0143.