• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

t(11;14)多发性骨髓瘤的自然史。

Natural history of t(11;14) multiple myeloma.

机构信息

Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Internal Medicine, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Leukemia. 2018 Jan;32(1):131-138. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.204. Epub 2017 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1038/leu.2017.204
PMID:28655925
Abstract

Translocation (11;14) on interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization in plasma cells is regarded as a standard risk prognostic marker in multiple myeloma based on studies conducted before introduction of current therapies. We identified 365 patients with t(11;14), and 730 matched controls:132 patients with non-(11;14) translocations and 598 patients with no chromosomal translocation. The median progression-free survival for the three groups were 23.0 (95% confidence interval (CI), 20.8-27.6), 19.0 (95% CI, 15.8-22.7) and 28.3 (95% CI, 25.7-30.6) months, respectively (P<0.01). The median overall survival (OS) for t(11;14), non-(11;14) translocation and no-translocation groups were 74.4 (95% CI, 64.8-89.3), 49.8 (95% CI, 40.0-60.6) and 103.6 (95% CI, 85.2-112.3) months, respectively (P<0.01). Excluding those with 17p abnormality, the median OS in the three groups were 81.7 (95% CI, 67.0-90.7), 58.2 (95% CI, 47.0-76.4) and 108.3 (95% CI, 92.4-140.1) months, respectively (P<0.01). The above relationship held true in patients with age <65 years, international staging system (ISS) I/II stage or those who received novel agent-based induction. Advanced age (hazard ratio (HR): 1.98), 17p abnormality (HR: 2.2) and ISS III stage (HR: 1.59) at diagnosis predicted reduced OS in patients with t(11;14). These results suggest that outcomes of t(11;14) MM are inferior to other standard risk patients.

摘要

(11;14)易位在浆细胞间期荧光原位杂交中被认为是多发性骨髓瘤的标准风险预后标志物,这一结论基于当前疗法引入之前的研究。我们鉴定了 365 例 t(11;14)患者和 730 例匹配对照:132 例非(11;14)易位患者和 598 例无染色体易位患者。三组患者的中位无进展生存期分别为 23.0(95%置信区间(CI),20.8-27.6)、19.0(95%CI,15.8-22.7)和 28.3(95%CI,25.7-30.6)个月(P<0.01)。t(11;14)、非(11;14)易位和无易位组的中位总生存期(OS)分别为 74.4(95%CI,64.8-89.3)、49.8(95%CI,40.0-60.6)和 103.6(95%CI,85.2-112.3)个月(P<0.01)。排除 17p 异常患者后,三组患者的中位 OS 分别为 81.7(95%CI,67.0-90.7)、58.2(95%CI,47.0-76.4)和 108.3(95%CI,92.4-140.1)个月(P<0.01)。在年龄<65 岁、国际分期系统(ISS)I/II 期或接受新型药物诱导的患者中,这种关系仍然成立。在 t(11;14)患者中,年龄较大(危险比(HR):1.98)、17p 异常(HR:2.2)和 ISS III 期(HR:1.59)与 OS 降低相关。这些结果表明,t(11;14)MM 的结局劣于其他标准风险患者。

相似文献

1
Natural history of t(11;14) multiple myeloma.t(11;14)多发性骨髓瘤的自然史。
Leukemia. 2018 Jan;32(1):131-138. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.204. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
2
Natural history of multiple myeloma with de novo del(17p).初发性 del(17p)多发性骨髓瘤的自然史。
Blood Cancer J. 2019 Mar 7;9(3):32. doi: 10.1038/s41408-019-0191-y.
3
Chromosomal abnormalities of young multiple myeloma patients (<45 yr) are not different from those of other age groups and are independent of stage according to the International Staging System.年轻的多发性骨髓瘤患者(<45岁)的染色体异常与其他年龄组并无差异,且根据国际分期系统与分期无关。
Eur J Haematol. 2007 Mar;78(3):227-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2006.00807.x. Epub 2007 Jan 23.
4
Recurrent involvement of heterochromatic regions in multiple myeloma-a multicolor FISH study.多发性骨髓瘤中异染色质区的反复累及——一项多色 FISH 研究。
Leuk Res. 2010 Aug;34(8):1002-6. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2009.10.027. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
5
Translocation t(11;14) in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma: Is it always favorable?新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤患者中的11号与14号染色体易位:它总是有利的吗?
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2016 Sep;55(9):710-8. doi: 10.1002/gcc.22372. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
6
Combining information regarding chromosomal aberrations t(4;14) and del(17p13) with the International Staging System classification allows stratification of myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation.联合染色体异常 t(4;14)和 del(17p13)的信息与国际分期系统分类,可对接受自体干细胞移植的骨髓瘤患者进行分层。
Haematologica. 2010 Jul;95(7):1150-7. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2009.016436. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
7
Combination of Genetic Aberration With International Staging System Classification for Stratification of Asian Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.基因畸变与国际分期系统分类相结合用于亚洲接受自体干细胞移植的多发性骨髓瘤患者的分层
In Vivo. 2019 Mar-Apr;33(2):611-619. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11518.
8
Progression in smoldering myeloma is independently determined by the chromosomal abnormalities del(17p), t(4;14), gain 1q, hyperdiploidy, and tumor load.冒烟型骨髓瘤的进展是由染色体异常 del(17p)、t(4;14)、1q 增益、超二倍体和肿瘤负荷独立决定的。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec 1;31(34):4325-32. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.4923. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
9
Next Generation Sequencing-based Validation of the Revised International Staging System for Multiple Myeloma: An Analysis of the MMRF CoMMpass Study.基于下一代测序的多发性骨髓瘤修订国际分期系统的验证:MMRF CoMMpass研究分析
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 May;19(5):285-289. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
10
Revised International Staging System for Multiple Myeloma: A Report From International Myeloma Working Group.多发性骨髓瘤修订国际分期系统:国际骨髓瘤工作组报告
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep 10;33(26):2863-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.2267. Epub 2015 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating the Prognostic Complexity of IgH Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Multiple Myeloma Among Diverse IgH Cytogenetic Abnormalities-Involved High-Risk Stratifications.在多种涉及免疫球蛋白重链(IgH)细胞遗传学异常的高危分层中,应对多发性骨髓瘤中IgH细胞遗传学异常的预后复杂性
Cancer Med. 2025 Sep;14(17):e71152. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71152.
2
Ixazomib or Lenalidomide combined with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in the treatment of elderly transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.伊沙佐米或来那度胺联合环磷酰胺和地塞米松治疗老年不适合移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 24;15(1):6538. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91126-5.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Multiple myeloma: 2016 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management.多发性骨髓瘤:2016年诊断、风险分层及管理的最新进展
Am J Hematol. 2016 Jul;91(7):719-34. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24402.
2
Translocation t(11;14) in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma: Is it always favorable?新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤患者中的11号与14号染色体易位:它总是有利的吗?
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2016 Sep;55(9):710-8. doi: 10.1002/gcc.22372. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
3
Genetic aberrations in multiple myeloma characterized by cIg-FISH: a Brazilian context.
Is t(11;14) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma a favorable outcome in the novel agent era?
在新型药物时代,新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤中t(11;14)是否预示良好预后?
Blood Res. 2025 Feb 6;60(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s44313-025-00056-8.
4
T(11;14) with multiple myeloma: Standard risk survival but slow and poor response.伴有多发性骨髓瘤的T(11;14):标准风险生存,但反应缓慢且不佳。
Ann Hematol. 2024 Dec;103(12):5573-5581. doi: 10.1007/s00277-024-06026-x. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
5
Which factors are associated with adverse prognosis in multiple myeloma patients after surgery? - preliminary establishment and validation of the nomogram.哪些因素与多发性骨髓瘤患者手术后的不良预后相关?——列线图的初步建立与验证。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun 25;22(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03453-y.
6
The Role of t(11;14) in Tailoring Treatment Decisions in Multiple Myeloma.t(11;14)在多发性骨髓瘤治疗决策制定中的作用
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 13;15(24):5829. doi: 10.3390/cancers15245829.
7
The prognostic impact of t(11;14) in multiple myeloma: A real-world analysis from the Australian Lymphoma Leukaemia Group (ALLG) and the Australian Myeloma and Related Diseases Registry (MRDR).t(11;14)对多发性骨髓瘤的预后影响:来自澳大利亚淋巴瘤白血病组(ALLG)和澳大利亚骨髓瘤及相关疾病登记处(MRDR)的真实世界分析。
EJHaem. 2023 Jul 25;4(3):639-646. doi: 10.1002/jha2.742. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
Multiple myeloma with t(11;14): impact of novel agents on outcome.多发性骨髓瘤伴 t(11;14):新型药物对结局的影响。
Blood Cancer J. 2023 Mar 20;13(1):40. doi: 10.1038/s41408-023-00807-9.
9
Efficacy and safety of venetoclax-based regimens for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a systemic review and meta-analysis.基于维奈托克的方案治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ther Adv Hematol. 2023 Mar 6;14:20406207231155028. doi: 10.1177/20406207231155028. eCollection 2023.
10
CD20 expression: A risk stratification factor for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with t(11;14).CD20表达:伴有t(11;14)的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤的一个风险分层因素。
Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 1;12:1061438. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1061438. eCollection 2022.
以胞浆免疫球蛋白荧光原位杂交(cIg-FISH)为特征的多发性骨髓瘤的基因畸变:巴西的情况
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2016;49(5):e5034. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20155034. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
4
Impact of cytogenetic classification on outcomes following early high-dose therapy in multiple myeloma.细胞遗传学分类对多发性骨髓瘤早期大剂量治疗后结局的影响。
Leukemia. 2016 Mar;30(3):633-9. doi: 10.1038/leu.2015.287. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
5
Guidelines for determination of the number of prior lines of therapy in multiple myeloma.多发性骨髓瘤既往治疗线数的判定指南。
Blood. 2015 Aug 13;126(7):921-2. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-05-647636.
6
The t(11;14)(q13;q32) translocation as a poor prognostic parameter for autologous stem cell transplantation in myeloma patients with extramedullary plasmacytoma.t(11;14)(q13;q32)易位作为髓外浆细胞瘤骨髓瘤患者自体干细胞移植的不良预后参数。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2015 Apr;15(4):227-35. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2014.12.007. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
7
Continued improvement in survival in multiple myeloma: changes in early mortality and outcomes in older patients.多发性骨髓瘤患者的生存率持续提高:老年患者早期死亡率和结局的变化。
Leukemia. 2014 May;28(5):1122-8. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.313. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
8
t(11;14) multiple myeloma: a subtype associated with distinct immunological features, immunophenotypic characteristics but divergent outcome.t(11;14) 多发性骨髓瘤:一种与独特免疫特征、免疫表型特征相关但结局不同的亚型。
Leuk Res. 2013 Oct;37(10):1251-7. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2013.06.020. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
9
Impact of t(11;14)(q13;q32) on the outcome of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.t(11;14)(q13;q32) 对多发性骨髓瘤自体造血细胞移植结局的影响。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 Aug;19(8):1227-32. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.05.017. Epub 2013 May 31.
10
Trisomies in multiple myeloma: impact on survival in patients with high-risk cytogenetics.多发性骨髓瘤中的三体:对高危细胞遗传学患者生存的影响。
Blood. 2012 Mar 1;119(9):2100-5. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-11-390658. Epub 2012 Jan 10.