Coentrão Luís, Martins Patrícia, Leblanc Ana, Botelho Carmen, Carvalho Berta Aguiar, Pestana Manuel
Nephrology Research and Development Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Hospital de S. João EPE, Porto, Portugal.
Institute of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
NDT Plus. 2010 Jun;3(3):298-299. doi: 10.1093/ndtplus/sfq005. Epub 2010 Feb 28.
Dialysis reactions with biocompatible membranes are rare, and complement activation has been suggested to be a culprit. We report here a case of an incident haemodialysis patient with asthma disease who experienced severe adverse reactions late into dialysis session, with different synthetic membranes (FX 80, Fresenius; Polyflux 17L, Gambro; FX 10, Fresenius; BLS 512, Bellco-Sorin). After replacing the dialyser by the surface-treated AN69 membrane (Nephral ST 500, Hospal), the dialysis sessions became uneventful. The case reinforces the need for biocompatible dialysers with high permeability and adsorptive capacity in susceptible patients experiencing severe dialysis reactions with synthetic membranes.
使用生物相容性膜的透析反应很少见,补体激活被认为是一个原因。我们在此报告一例患有哮喘病的急性血液透析患者,在透析后期使用不同的合成膜(费森尤斯FX 80、金宝Polyflux 17L、费森尤斯FX 10、百特 - 索林BLS 512)时出现严重不良反应。在用经表面处理的AN69膜(Hospal公司的Nephral ST 500)更换透析器后,透析过程变得顺利。该病例进一步表明,对于使用合成膜出现严重透析反应的易感患者,需要具有高通透性和吸附能力的生物相容性透析器。