• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后延迟取出塑料胆管支架的预测因素及结局

Predictors and outcomes of delayed plastic biliary stent removal following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

作者信息

Kim Shawn J, Ohanian Edmond, Lee Frances, Nam Bryan, Che Kendrick, Laine Loren, Kim Sarah E, Kim John J

机构信息

a Division of Gastroenterology , Loma Linda University Medical Center , Loma Linda , CA , USA.

b Section of Digestive Diseases , Yale University School of Medicine , New Haven , CT , USA.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct;52(10):1128-1132. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1342138. Epub 2017 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1080/00365521.2017.1342138
PMID:28657377
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Plastic biliary stents are commonly placed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and should be removed or replaced within 3 months to reduce the risk of stent obstruction. The aim of the study was to identify predictors and outcomes of patients who had delayed plastic biliary stent removal following ERCP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients who received ERCP with plastic biliary stent placement at Loma Linda University Medical Center (10/2004-6/2013) were identified. Delayed removal was defined as presence of stent >3 months after index ERCP. Multivariable regression analysis to identify baseline characteristics associated with delayed removal was performed. Clinical outcomes of stent obstruction (e.g., cholangitis, hospitalization, intensive care) were also collected for those with delayed removal.

RESULTS

Among 374 patients undergoing ERCP with plastic biliary stent, 71 (19%) had delayed stent removal. Patients who had anesthesia assistance (AOR = 3.8, 95%CI 1.2-11.4), non-English primary language (AOR = 3.0, 95%CI 1.5-6.2), and outpatient ERCP (AOR = 2.0, 95%CI 1.1-3.4) had increased while choledocholithiasis (AOR = 0.5, 95%CI 0.3-0.99) had lower odds of delayed stent removal. Among those with delayed removal, 13 (18%) were hospitalized for stent obstruction (5 (7%) had cholangitis, 8 (11%) were hospitalized for more than a week, and 3 (4%) required intensive care).

CONCLUSIONS

Almost one-fifth of patients who underwent ERCP with plastic biliary stent placement had delayed removal with nearly one-fifth of these patients requiring hospitalization for stent obstruction. Targeting patients at risk by improving communication and ease of scheduling an ERCP may reduce preventable adverse events associated with delayed biliary stent removal.

摘要

目的

塑料胆管支架通常在内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)期间放置,应在3个月内取出或更换,以降低支架阻塞的风险。本研究的目的是确定ERCP术后延迟取出塑料胆管支架的患者的预测因素和预后。

材料与方法

确定在洛马林达大学医学中心(2004年10月至2013年6月)接受ERCP并放置塑料胆管支架的连续患者。延迟取出定义为首次ERCP后支架留置时间超过3个月。进行多变量回归分析以确定与延迟取出相关的基线特征。还收集了延迟取出患者的支架阻塞临床结局(如胆管炎、住院、重症监护)。

结果

在374例行ERCP并放置塑料胆管支架的患者中,71例(19%)延迟取出支架。接受麻醉辅助的患者(调整后比值比[AOR]=3.8,95%置信区间[CI]1.2 - 11.4)、以非英语为主要语言的患者(AOR = 3.0,95%CI 1.5 - 6.2)和门诊ERCP患者(AOR = 2.0,95%CI 对延迟取出支架的可能性增加,而胆总管结石患者(AOR = 0.5,95%CI 0.3至0.99)延迟取出支架的可能性较低。在延迟取出的患者中,13例(18%)因支架阻塞住院(5例(7%)发生胆管炎,8例(11%)住院超过一周,3例(4%)需要重症监护)。

结论

近五分之一接受ERCP并放置塑料胆管支架的患者延迟取出支架,其中近五分之一的患者因支架阻塞需要住院治疗。通过改善沟通和简化ERCP的安排来针对高危患者,可能会减少与延迟胆管支架取出相关的可预防不良事件。

相似文献

1
Predictors and outcomes of delayed plastic biliary stent removal following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后延迟取出塑料胆管支架的预测因素及结局
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct;52(10):1128-1132. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1342138. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
2
Real-life patency of plastic biliary stents in the pandemic era: is stent removal after 6 months safe and effective?疫情时代塑料胆道支架的实际通畅率:6 个月后取出支架是否安全有效?
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jul;58(7):798-804. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2164210. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
3
Outcome of forgotten biliary stents for more than five years-A two-decade experience.超过五年被遗忘的胆道支架的结果——二十年的经验。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2024 Aug;43(4):768-774. doi: 10.1007/s12664-023-01493-y. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
4
Predictors of proximal migration of straight biliary plastic stents.直型胆道塑料支架近端迁移的预测因素。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jun;43(3):592-600. doi: 10.1007/s12664-023-01469-y. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
5
Endoscopic plastic stenting for bile duct stones: stent changing on demand or every 3 months. A prospective comparison study.内镜下塑料支架置入治疗胆管结石:按需更换支架或每 3 个月更换一次。一项前瞻性对比研究。
Endoscopy. 2013 Dec;45(12):1014-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344556. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
6
Complications and management of forgotten long-term biliary stents.遗忘长期胆道支架的并发症及处理
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan 28;23(4):622-628. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i4.622.
7
Predictive risk factors associated with cholangitis following ERCP.经内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)后胆系感染的预测风险因素。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):799-804. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5746-z. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
8
Risk Factors for the Development of Stent-Associated Cholangitis Following Endoscopic Biliary Stent Placement.经内镜胆道支架置入术后支架相关胆管炎发展的危险因素。
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Aug;64(8):2300-2307. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05533-6. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
9
A US Multicenter Study of Safety and Efficacy of Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metallic Stents in Benign Extrahepatic Biliary Strictures.一项关于全覆膜自膨式金属支架治疗良性肝外胆管狭窄的安全性和有效性的美国多中心研究。
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Nov;60(11):3442-8. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3653-5. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
10
Biliary spontaneous dislodgement spiral stent for patients who underwent mechanical lithotripsy.经机械碎石术治疗的患者的胆道自发性移位螺旋支架。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Feb 21;26(7):740-748. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i7.740.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Outcomes of Retained Plastic Biliary Stents: A Targeted Narrative Review.留置塑料胆道支架的临床结局:一项针对性叙述性综述
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Aug 29. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09363-7.
2
Quality measures in the delivery of equitable endoscopic care to traditionally underserved patients in the United States.在美国为传统上服务不足的患者提供公平的内镜护理中的质量衡量标准。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Apr;101(4):733-744. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.06.030. Epub 2024 Oct 18.