• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直型胆道塑料支架近端迁移的预测因素。

Predictors of proximal migration of straight biliary plastic stents.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Seth G S Medical College and K E M Hospital, 9Th Floor, Ward 32 A, Multistory Building, Acharya Donde Marg, Parel, Mumbai, 400 012, India.

出版信息

Indian J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jun;43(3):592-600. doi: 10.1007/s12664-023-01469-y. Epub 2023 Nov 28.

DOI:10.1007/s12664-023-01469-y
PMID:38015380
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Proximal biliary plastic stent migration (PSM) remains a challenging complication. The study aims at determining the PSM rate, retrieval outcomes and factors associated with PSM.

METHODS

Endoscopy database was analyzed from January 2016 to January 2021 to identify 1137 patients, who underwent stent removal or repeat endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Demography, methods of stent retrieval, outcomes and complications were noted. Logistic regression was performed to determine risk factors for PSM. Propensity score matching was done in a 1:1 manner using age, sex, comorbidities and indication to assess endoscopy-related factors. Clinical trial registration done (CTRI/2022/02/040516).

RESULTS

PSM was noted in 74 (6.5%) cases. Stent retrieval was successful in 94.59% (70/74) of cases. A balloon catheter (46/74) was commonly used. Technical failure was due to an impacted stent (2) and stent above the stricture (2). Complications were seen in 2.7% of cases. On multi-variate regression, sphincteroplasty at index ERCP (Odds ratio [OR] = 5.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.7-11.89), stent length < 10 cm (OR = 8.53, 95% CI = 3.2-22.47), 7-Fr stent (OR = 18.25, 95% CI = 6.5-50.64), dilated bile duct (mean diameter- 9.2 ± 3.94 mm) (OR = 0.384, 95% CI = 0.18-0.72) and delayed ERCP by > 3 months from index ERCP (OR = 15.28, 95% CI = 8.1-28.49). After performing propensity score matching for age, sex, comorbidities and indication to determine endoscopy-related factors, 7-Fr stent size (OR 3.495; 95% CI-1.23-9.93) and duration of indwelling stent for more than three months (OR-3.37; 95% CI-1.646-6.76) were significantly associated with proximal stent migration.

CONCLUSION

Proximally migrated straight stents can be successfully retrieved using standard accessories. The use of 7-Fr size stent, stents indwelling for more than three months, sphincteroplasty at index ERCP, stent length < 10 cm and dilated bile duct were associated with increased risk of proximal migration of straight biliary plastic stents. After propensity score matching, the use of 7-Fr size stents and stent indwelling for over three months were endoscopy-related factors associated with proximal migration.

摘要

背景/目的:近端胆道塑料支架迁移(PSM)仍然是一个具有挑战性的并发症。本研究旨在确定 PSM 发生率、取出结果和与 PSM 相关的因素。

方法

从 2016 年 1 月至 2021 年 1 月,对内镜数据库进行了分析,共纳入 1137 例接受支架取出或重复内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)的患者。记录患者的人口统计学资料、支架取出方法、结果和并发症。采用逻辑回归确定 PSM 的危险因素。采用年龄、性别、合并症和适应证进行 1:1 倾向评分匹配,以评估内镜相关因素。临床试验已注册(CTRI/2022/02/040516)。

结果

74 例(6.5%)发生 PSM。94.59%(70/74)的支架取出成功。通常使用球囊导管(46/74)。技术失败的原因是支架堵塞(2 例)和支架位于狭窄上方(2 例)。并发症发生率为 2.7%。多变量回归分析显示,索引 ERCP 时行括约肌切开术(比值比[OR] = 5.68,95%置信区间[CI] = 2.7-11.89)、支架长度<10cm(OR = 8.53,95%CI = 3.2-22.47)、7Fr 支架(OR = 18.25,95%CI = 6.5-50.64)、扩张胆管(平均直径-9.2 ± 3.94mm)(OR = 0.384,95%CI = 0.18-0.72)和索引 ERCP 后>3 个月延迟行 ERCP(OR = 15.28,95%CI = 8.1-28.49)。对年龄、性别、合并症和适应证进行倾向评分匹配以确定内镜相关因素后,7Fr 支架大小(OR 3.495;95%CI-1.23-9.93)和支架留置时间超过三个月(OR-3.37;95%CI-1.646-6.76)与近端支架迁移显著相关。

结论

可使用标准器械成功取出近端迁移的直形支架。7Fr 支架大小、支架留置时间超过三个月、索引 ERCP 时行括约肌切开术、支架长度<10cm 和扩张胆管与直形胆道塑料支架近端迁移风险增加相关。在进行倾向评分匹配后,7Fr 支架的使用和支架留置时间超过三个月是与近端迁移相关的内镜相关因素。

相似文献

1
Predictors of proximal migration of straight biliary plastic stents.直型胆道塑料支架近端迁移的预测因素。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jun;43(3):592-600. doi: 10.1007/s12664-023-01469-y. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
2
Biliary sphincteroplasty facilitates retrieval of proximally migrated plastic biliary stent.胆管括约肌成形术有助于取出向近端移位的塑料胆管支架。
Trop Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr-Jun;35(2):103-6. doi: 10.7869/tg.188.
3
Risk factors for proximal migration of biliary tube stents.胆管支架近端移位的危险因素。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb 7;20(5):1318-24. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i5.1318.
4
Incidence, risk factors and endoscopic retrieval of proximally migrated pancreatic stents: 25 years of experience in a high-volume center - a case controlled study.近端移位胰管支架的发生率、危险因素及内镜取出术:高容量中心25年的经验——一项病例对照研究
Int J Surg. 2025 Apr 1;111(4):3115-3119. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002273.
5
Predictors and outcomes of delayed plastic biliary stent removal following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后延迟取出塑料胆管支架的预测因素及结局
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct;52(10):1128-1132. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1342138. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
6
Migration of biliary plastic stents: experience of a tertiary center.胆管塑料支架移位:一家三级中心的经验
Surg Endosc. 2009 Apr;23(4):769-75. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0067-x. Epub 2008 Jul 23.
7
Migration of plastic biliary stents and endoscopic retrieval: an experience of three referral centers.塑料胆管支架移位及内镜下取出:三个转诊中心的经验
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009 Jun;19(3):217-21. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181a031f5.
8
Outcome of forgotten biliary stents for more than five years-A two-decade experience.超过五年被遗忘的胆道支架的结果——二十年的经验。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2024 Aug;43(4):768-774. doi: 10.1007/s12664-023-01493-y. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
9
Cholangiopancreatography troubleshooting: the usefulness of endoscopic retrieval of migrated biliary and pancreatic stents.胆管胰管造影故障排除:经内镜取出移位的胆管和胰管支架的作用。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2009 Dec;8(6):632-7.
10
Endoscopic retrieval of proximally migrated biliary and pancreatic stents: experience of a large referral center.内镜下取出向近端移位的胆管和胰管支架:一家大型转诊中心的经验
Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 Jun;47(6):486-91. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70249-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Weak peristalsis is strongly associated with erosive reflux disease.蠕动减弱与糜烂性反流病密切相关。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb;44(1):106-108. doi: 10.1007/s12664-023-01514-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Removal of proximally migrated biliary stents by using single-operator cholangioscopy.使用单操作者胆管镜移除近端移位的胆管支架。
VideoGIE. 2020 Feb 13;5(5):213-216. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2020.01.001. eCollection 2020 May.
2
Biliary sphincteroplasty facilitates retrieval of proximally migrated plastic biliary stent.胆管括约肌成形术有助于取出向近端移位的塑料胆管支架。
Trop Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr-Jun;35(2):103-6. doi: 10.7869/tg.188.
3
Risk factors for proximal migration of biliary tube stents.胆管支架近端移位的危险因素。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb 7;20(5):1318-24. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i5.1318.
4
A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop.内镜不良事件词汇表:美国胃肠内镜学会研讨会报告
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):446-54. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027.
5
Migration of biliary plastic stents: experience of a tertiary center.胆管塑料支架移位:一家三级中心的经验
Surg Endosc. 2009 Apr;23(4):769-75. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0067-x. Epub 2008 Jul 23.
6
[Incidence and relation of endoscopic sphincterotomy to the proximal migration of biliary prostheses].[内镜括约肌切开术与胆管支架近端移位的发生率及关系]
Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2000 Oct-Dec;65(4):159-62.
7
Endoscopic techniques for retrieval of proximally migrated biliary stents: the Amsterdam experience.内镜下取出近端移位胆管支架的技术:阿姆斯特丹经验
Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Dec;50(6):780-5. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70158-6.
8
Endoscopic retrieval of proximally migrated biliary and pancreatic stents: experience of a large referral center.内镜下取出向近端移位的胆管和胰管支架:一家大型转诊中心的经验
Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 Jun;47(6):486-91. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70249-4.
9
Proximal migration of biliary stents: attempted endoscopic retrieval in forty-one patients.胆管支架近端移位:41例患者的内镜下取出尝试
Gastrointest Endosc. 1995 Dec;42(6):513-20. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(95)70003-x.
10
Proximal migration of a biliary stent: treatment by combined percutaneous/endoscopic approach.胆管支架近端移位:经皮/内镜联合治疗方法
Gastrointest Endosc. 1995 Jun;41(6):611-2. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(95)70204-0.