Butler Jorie M, Anderson Katherine A, Supiano Mark A, Weir Charlene R
J.M. Butler is assistant professor, Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; associate director of education and evaluation, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah; and investigator, Informatics, Decision Enhancement and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS 2.0) Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Center of Innovation (COIN), Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.K.A. Anderson is assistant professor, Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.M.A. Supiano is professor and chief, Division of Geriatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; D. Keith Barnes, M.D. and Dottie Barnes Presidential Endowed Chair in Medicine; and director, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.C.R. Weir is professor, Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, and associate director, Informatics, Decision Enhancement and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS 2.0) Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Center of Innovation (COIN), Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Acad Med. 2017 Jul;92(7):984-990. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001474.
The learning health care system promotes development and application of evidence generated within the health care system to enhance the quality of patient care. The purpose of this study was to understand resident attitudes about quality improvement (QI) in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-approved programs.
Four focus groups were conducted with 45 residents at the University of Utah School of Medicine during September and October 2014. Residents discussed the perceived value of QI and their experiences with QI. Qualitative analysis was conducted iteratively, resulting in a set of constructs that were then consolidated into overarching themes.
Five themes emerged from the qualitative analysis. Four of these represented QI participation barriers: challenges with understanding the vision of QI, confusion about basic aspects of QI, a sense that resident contributions to QI are not valued/valuable to the QI process, and challenges with prioritizing responsibilities relating to QI compared with other responsibilities. One theme represented a facilitator of successful QI: factors that make QI work successfully (e.g., clear goals and a sense of being on the "same page").
If resident attitudes about QI do not improve, the culture of the learning health care system is threatened. An important step in enhancing the perceived value of QI is resolving the perceived tension between providing excellent patient care and satisfying other goals. Involving residents more effectively in QI may result in improved attitudes and promote development of a better-functioning learning health care system.
学习型医疗保健系统促进医疗保健系统内部所产生证据的开发与应用,以提高患者护理质量。本研究的目的是了解住院医师对研究生医学教育认证委员会认可项目中的质量改进(QI)的态度。
2014年9月和10月,在犹他大学医学院对45名住院医师进行了4次焦点小组访谈。住院医师们讨论了质量改进的感知价值及其质量改进经历。进行了迭代定性分析,得出了一组构建要素,并将其整合为总体主题。
定性分析得出了5个主题。其中4个代表质量改进参与障碍:理解质量改进愿景方面的挑战;对质量改进基本方面的困惑;感觉住院医师对质量改进的贡献在质量改进过程中未得到重视/无价值;与其他职责相比,在确定质量改进相关职责的优先级方面存在挑战。一个主题代表成功进行质量改进的促进因素:使质量改进成功的因素(例如,明确的目标和“达成共识”的感觉)。
如果住院医师对质量改进的态度没有改善,学习型医疗保健系统的文化将受到威胁。提高质量改进感知价值的一个重要步骤是解决在提供优质患者护理与满足其他目标之间所感知到的矛盾。更有效地让住院医师参与质量改进可能会改善态度,并促进更好运行的学习型医疗保健系统的发展。