• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估从编码数据得出的患者安全估计值。

Assessing Estimates of Patient Safety Derived From Coded Data.

作者信息

Narain Wazim

出版信息

J Healthc Qual. 2017 Jul/Aug;39(4):230-242. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000088.

DOI:10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000088
PMID:28658091
Abstract

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) developed Patient Safety Indicators (PSI) with the goal of detecting and preventing adverse events using administrative data. Use of PSIs to measure safety and quality of care raises questions since they rely heavily on coded data. The goal of this paper is to review literature on AHRQ PSIs, specifically their accuracy in detecting adverse events, and how recent coding changes affect the accuracy of these estimates. The Healthcare Utilization Project (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample (NIS) contains data on more than seven million hospital stays yearly. Trending these estimates over time indicate there has been a decrease in rates for the majority of PSIs, with Accidental Puncture or Laceration, Central Venous Catheter Blood Stream Infections, Iatrogenic Pneumothorax, and Deaths from complications decreasing significantly each year from 2008-2012. Birth Trauma, Retained Foreign Bodies, Post-op Sepsis and Post-Op Respiratory Failure PSIs show no improvement from 2008-2012. A literature review on accuracy of PSIs and the affect of the Present on Admission (POA) indicator on PSI estimates reveals mixed results. PSIs serve as a useful tool in identifying problem areas in quality of care but should be used cautiously in determining hospital performance.

摘要

医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)开发了患者安全指标(PSI),旨在利用行政数据检测和预防不良事件。由于PSI严重依赖编码数据,因此使用它们来衡量医疗安全和质量引发了一些问题。本文的目的是回顾关于AHRQ PSI的文献,特别是其在检测不良事件方面的准确性,以及近期的编码变化如何影响这些估计的准确性。医疗保健利用项目(HCUP)的全国住院患者样本(NIS)每年包含超过700万次住院的数据。随着时间的推移对这些估计进行趋势分析表明,大多数PSI的发生率有所下降,其中意外穿刺或撕裂伤、中心静脉导管血流感染、医源性气胸以及并发症导致的死亡人数在2008年至2012年期间每年都显著下降。出生创伤、异物残留、术后脓毒症和术后呼吸衰竭PSI在2008年至2012年期间没有改善。一项关于PSI准确性以及入院时情况(POA)指标对PSI估计影响的文献综述显示结果不一。PSI是识别医疗质量问题领域的有用工具,但在确定医院绩效时应谨慎使用。

相似文献

1
Assessing Estimates of Patient Safety Derived From Coded Data.评估从编码数据得出的患者安全估计值。
J Healthc Qual. 2017 Jul/Aug;39(4):230-242. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000088.
2
Relevance of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators for children's hospitals.医疗保健研究与质量机构的患者安全指标对儿童医院的相关性。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):135-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1083. Epub 2004 Dec 3.
3
Comparison of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicator Rates Among Veteran Dual Users.退伍军人双重使用者中医疗保健研究与质量局患者安全指标率的比较。
Am J Med Qual. 2014 Jul-Aug;29(4):335-43. doi: 10.1177/1062860613499402. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
4
Is patient safety improving? National trends in patient safety indicators: 1998-2007.患者安全状况是否有所改善?1998-2007 年国家患者安全指标趋势。
Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb;47(1 Pt 2):414-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01361.x. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
5
Performance Measures in Neurosurgical Patient Care: Differing Applications of Patient Safety Indicators.神经外科患者护理中的绩效指标:患者安全指标的不同应用
Med Care. 2016 Apr;54(4):359-64. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000490.
6
Validity of the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Hospital-acquired Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.医疗保健研究与质量机构患者安全指标及医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心医院获得性疾病的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Med Care. 2016 Dec;54(12):1105-1111. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000550.
7
Validating the patient safety indicators in the Veterans Health Administration: do they accurately identify true safety events?验证退伍军人健康管理局的患者安全指标:它们是否能准确识别真实的安全事件?
Med Care. 2012 Jan;50(1):74-85. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182293edf.
8
A critical review of patient safety indicators attributed to trauma surgeons.对归因于创伤外科医生的患者安全指标的批判性综述。
Injury. 2017 Sep;48(9):1994-1998. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.03.051. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
9
Validity of 16 AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators to identify in-hospital complications: a medical record review across nine Swiss hospitals.16 项 AHRQ 患者安全指标用于识别医院内并发症的有效性:瑞士九家医院的病历回顾。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2023 Nov 17;35(4):0. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad092.
10
Examining the impact of the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) on the Veterans Health Administration: the case of readmissions.审查 AHRQ 患者安全指标 (PSIs) 对退伍军人健康管理局的影响:再入院案例。
Med Care. 2013 Jan;51(1):37-44. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318270c0f7.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the excess costs of the in-hospital adverse events covered by the AHRQ's Patient Safety Indicators in Switzerland.评估瑞士AHRQ患者安全指标所涵盖的住院不良事件的额外费用。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 5;19(2):e0285285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285285. eCollection 2024.
2
Validity of 16 AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators to identify in-hospital complications: a medical record review across nine Swiss hospitals.16 项 AHRQ 患者安全指标用于识别医院内并发症的有效性:瑞士九家医院的病历回顾。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2023 Nov 17;35(4):0. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad092.
3
Increasing Numbers and Reported Adverse Events in Patients with Lung Cancer Undergoing Inpatient Lung Biopsies: A Population-Based Analysis.
肺癌患者接受住院肺活检的数量和报告的不良事件不断增加:一项基于人群的分析。
Lung. 2019 Oct;197(5):593-599. doi: 10.1007/s00408-019-00255-y. Epub 2019 Jul 31.