Hwang Jun Hyun, Park Soon-Woo
Department of Preventive Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(26):e7311. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007311.
We examined whether the responsiveness to an increase in cigarettes price differed by adolescents' cigarette acquisition source. We analyzed data on 6134 youth smokers (grades 7-12) from a cross-sectional survey in Korea with national representativeness. The respondents were classified into one of the following according to their source of cigarette acquisition: commercial-source group, social-source group, and others. Multiple logistic regressions were performed to estimate the effects of an increase in cigarette price on the intention to quit smoking on the basis of the cigarette acquisition source. Of the 6134 youth smokers, 36.0% acquired cigarettes from social sources, compared to the 49.6% who purchased cigarettes directly from commercial sources. In response to a future cigarette price increase, regardless of an individual's smoking level, there was no statistically significant difference in the odds ratio for the intention to stop smoking in association with cigarette acquisition sources. The social-source group had nonsignificant, but consistently positive, odds ratios (1.07-1.30) as compared to that of the commercial-source group. Our findings indicate that the cigarette acquisition source does not affect the responsiveness to an increase in cigarette price. Therefore, a cigarette price policy is a comprehensive strategy to reduce smoking among youth smokers, regardless of their source.
我们研究了青少年获取香烟的来源是否会使他们对香烟价格上涨的反应有所不同。我们分析了来自韩国一项具有全国代表性的横断面调查的6134名青少年吸烟者(7至12年级)的数据。根据获取香烟的来源,受访者被分为以下类别之一:商业来源组、社会来源组和其他组。我们进行了多项逻辑回归分析,以估计基于香烟获取来源的香烟价格上涨对戒烟意愿的影响。在6134名青少年吸烟者中,36.0%从社会渠道获取香烟,而直接从商业渠道购买香烟的比例为49.6%。对于未来香烟价格上涨,无论个人吸烟水平如何,与获取香烟来源相关的戒烟意愿的优势比均无统计学显著差异。与商业来源组相比,社会来源组的优势比不显著,但始终为正(1.07 - 1.30)。我们的研究结果表明,获取香烟的来源不会影响对香烟价格上涨的反应。因此,香烟价格政策是一项全面的策略,无论青少年吸烟者的获取来源如何,都可减少他们的吸烟行为。