Suppr超能文献

[Famotidine versus ranitidine in the acute treatment of duodenal ulcer. A multicenter comparative study in Germany].

作者信息

Simon B, Dammann H G, Jakob G, Miederer S E, Müller P, Ottenjann R, Paul F, Scholten T, Schütz E, Seifert E

出版信息

Z Gastroenterol. 1985 Feb;23(2):47-51.

PMID:2865859
Abstract

185 patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcers were randomly allocated to treatment with either famotidine 40 mg nocte, 20 mg bid, 40 mg bid or ranitidine 150 mg bid for 2-8 weeks in a prospective double-blind study. The four groups were similar with regard to age, sex, duration of ulcer disease, smoking habits etc. After 2 weeks treatment 28/42 patients (66.7%) healed on famotidine 40 mg nocte, 24/42 patients (57.1%) on famotidine 20 mg bid, 26/41 patients (63.4%) on famotidine 40 mg bid and 28/43 patients (65,1%) on ranitidine 150 mg bid. The corresponding healing rates after 4 weeks were 90.5%, 83.3%, 90.2% and 93%, respectively. After 8 weeks more than 93% of the patients had healed ulcers. At each time there was no statistical difference between the different famotidine regimens and the ranitidine group. All treatments were well tolerated and severe adverse events were rare. Famotidine 40 mg at night, therefore, appears to be as good as conventional ranitidine.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验