Pitron Victor, de Vignemont Frédérique
Institut Jean Nicod, UMR 8129, ENS/EHESS/CNRS, IEC, PSL Research University, 29 rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France; AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ouest, Service de Psychiatrie de l'adulte et du sujet âgé, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France.
Institut Jean Nicod, UMR 8129, ENS/EHESS/CNRS, IEC, PSL Research University, 29 rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France.
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Aug;53:115-121. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
The distinction between the body schema and the body image has become the stock in trade of much recent work in cognitive neuroscience and philosophy. Yet little is known about the interactions between these two types of body representations. We need to account not only for their dissociations in rare cases, but also for their convergence most of the time. Indeed in our everyday life the body we perceive does not conflict with the body we act with. Are the body image and the body schema then somehow reshaping each other or are they relatively independent and do they only happen to be congruent? On the basis of the study of bodily hallucinations, we consider which model can best account for the body schema/body image interactions.
身体图式与身体意象之间的区别已成为近期认知神经科学和哲学领域许多研究的常用话题。然而,对于这两种身体表征之间的相互作用,我们却知之甚少。我们不仅需要解释它们在罕见情况下的分离,还需要解释它们在大多数情况下的趋同。事实上,在我们的日常生活中,我们所感知的身体与我们用以行动的身体并不冲突。那么,身体意象和身体图式是在某种程度上相互塑造,还是相对独立,只是碰巧一致呢?基于对身体幻觉的研究,我们思考哪种模型最能解释身体图式/身体意象的相互作用。