Suppr超能文献

身体表象与认知本体论:绘制身体意象的边界

Body representations and cognitive ontology: Drawing the boundaries of the body image.

机构信息

Cognition and Philosophy Lab, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia.

出版信息

Conscious Cogn. 2019 Sep;74:102772. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102772. Epub 2019 Jul 4.

Abstract

The distinction between body image and body schema has been incredibly influential in cognitive neuroscience. Recently, researchers have begun to speculate about the relationship between these representations (Gadsby, 2017, 2018; Pitron & de Vignemont, 2017; Pitron et al., 2018). Within this emerging literature, Pitron et al. (2018) proposed that the long-term body image and long-term body schema co-construct one another, through a process of reciprocal interaction. In proposing this model, they make two assumptions: that the long-term body image incorporates the spatial characteristics of tools, and that it is distorted in the case of Alice in wonderland syndrome. Here, I challenge these assumptions, with a closer examination of what the term "long-term body image" refers to. In doing so, I draw out some important taxonomic principles for research into body representation.

摘要

身体意象和身体图式之间的区别在认知神经科学中具有非常重要的影响。最近,研究人员开始推测这些表示之间的关系(Gadsby,2017,2018;Pitron 和 de Vignemont,2017;Pitron 等人,2018)。在这一新兴文献中,Pitron 等人(2018)提出,长期的身体意象和长期的身体图式通过相互作用的过程共同构建彼此。在提出这个模型时,他们做出了两个假设:长期的身体意象包含了工具的空间特征,并且在爱丽丝梦游仙境综合征的情况下会发生扭曲。在这里,我通过更仔细地检查“长期身体意象”一词的含义来挑战这些假设。在这样做的过程中,我提出了一些重要的分类原则,用于研究身体表示。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验