Cognition and Philosophy Lab, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia.
Conscious Cogn. 2019 Sep;74:102772. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102772. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
The distinction between body image and body schema has been incredibly influential in cognitive neuroscience. Recently, researchers have begun to speculate about the relationship between these representations (Gadsby, 2017, 2018; Pitron & de Vignemont, 2017; Pitron et al., 2018). Within this emerging literature, Pitron et al. (2018) proposed that the long-term body image and long-term body schema co-construct one another, through a process of reciprocal interaction. In proposing this model, they make two assumptions: that the long-term body image incorporates the spatial characteristics of tools, and that it is distorted in the case of Alice in wonderland syndrome. Here, I challenge these assumptions, with a closer examination of what the term "long-term body image" refers to. In doing so, I draw out some important taxonomic principles for research into body representation.
身体意象和身体图式之间的区别在认知神经科学中具有非常重要的影响。最近,研究人员开始推测这些表示之间的关系(Gadsby,2017,2018;Pitron 和 de Vignemont,2017;Pitron 等人,2018)。在这一新兴文献中,Pitron 等人(2018)提出,长期的身体意象和长期的身体图式通过相互作用的过程共同构建彼此。在提出这个模型时,他们做出了两个假设:长期的身体意象包含了工具的空间特征,并且在爱丽丝梦游仙境综合征的情况下会发生扭曲。在这里,我通过更仔细地检查“长期身体意象”一词的含义来挑战这些假设。在这样做的过程中,我提出了一些重要的分类原则,用于研究身体表示。