• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Leaping lizards landing on leaves: escape-induced jumps in the rainforest canopy challenge the adhesive limits of geckos.蜥蜴跳到树叶上:在雨林树冠层因躲避而跳跃对壁虎的黏附极限构成挑战。
J R Soc Interface. 2017 Jun;14(131). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0156.
2
Attachment Beyond the Adhesive System: The Contribution of Claws to Gecko Clinging and Locomotion.超越黏附系统的附肢:爪在壁虎附着和运动中的作用。
Integr Comp Biol. 2019 Jul 1;59(1):168-181. doi: 10.1093/icb/icz027.
3
Frictional adhesion: A new angle on gecko attachment.摩擦粘附:壁虎附着的新视角。
J Exp Biol. 2006 Sep;209(Pt 18):3569-79. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02486.
4
Geckos as Springs: Mechanics Explain Across-Species Scaling of Adhesion.壁虎如弹簧:力学原理阐释了跨物种粘附力的尺度变化。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 2;10(9):e0134604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134604. eCollection 2015.
5
Stick or Slip: Adhesive Performance of Geckos and Gecko-Inspired Synthetics in Wet Environments.黏附还是滑脱:湿环境中壁虎和类壁虎仿生材料的黏附性能。
Integr Comp Biol. 2019 Jul 1;59(1):214-226. doi: 10.1093/icb/icz008.
6
The effect of surface water and wetting on gecko adhesion.壁虎黏附的表面水和润湿性效应。
J Exp Biol. 2012 Sep 1;215(Pt 17):3080-6. doi: 10.1242/jeb.070912.
7
Jumping with adhesion: landing surface incline alters impact force and body kinematics in crested geckos.带黏附力跳跃:着陆表面倾斜改变了冠鬣蜥的撞击力和身体运动学。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 29;11(1):23043. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02033-4.
8
Tokay geckos (Gekkonidae: ) preferentially use substrates that elicit maximal adhesive performance.印尼卢比(Gekkonidae:)偏好使用能发挥最大粘性性能的基质。
J Exp Biol. 2021 Feb 25;224(Pt 4):jeb241240. doi: 10.1242/jeb.241240.
9
Effects of temperature on maximum clinging ability in a diurnal gecko: evidence for a passive clinging mechanism?温度对昼行性壁虎最大附着能力的影响:被动附着机制的证据?
J Exp Zool A Comp Exp Biol. 2005 Sep 1;303(9):785-91. doi: 10.1002/jez.a.210.
10
A new angle on clinging in geckos: incline, not substrate, triggers the deployment of the adhesive system.壁虎抓附的新视角:倾斜度而非底物触发黏附系统的展开。
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Oct 22;276(1673):3705-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0946. Epub 2009 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Device for Measuring Contact Reaction Forces during Animal Adhesion Landing/Takeoff from Leaf-like Compliant Substrates.用于测量动物在从叶状柔性基质上附着着陆/起飞过程中接触反作用力的装置。
Biomimetics (Basel). 2024 Feb 26;9(3):141. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9030141.
2
Putting a new spin on insect jumping performance using 3D modeling and computer simulations of spotted lanternfly nymphs.利用 3D 建模和计算机模拟对美国白蛾若虫的跳跃性能进行全新研究。
J Exp Biol. 2023 Oct 1;226(19). doi: 10.1242/jeb.246340. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
3
The role of ecdysis in repair of an attachment system: a case study using geckos.蜕皮在附着系统修复中的作用:以壁虎为例的案例研究。
J Exp Biol. 2023 May 15;226(10). doi: 10.1242/jeb.245286. Epub 2023 May 12.
4
Growing up in a rough world: scaling of frictional adhesion and morphology of the Tokay gecko ().在恶劣环境中成长:蛤蚧的摩擦附着力缩放与形态学()
Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2022 Nov 9;13:1292-1302. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.13.107. eCollection 2022.
5
Multi-modal locomotor costs favor smaller males in a sexually dimorphic leaf-mimicking insect.多模态运动成本有利于性二态叶状模拟昆虫中体型较小的雄性。
BMC Ecol Evol. 2022 Mar 28;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12862-022-01993-z.
6
Jumping with adhesion: landing surface incline alters impact force and body kinematics in crested geckos.带黏附力跳跃:着陆表面倾斜改变了冠鬣蜥的撞击力和身体运动学。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 29;11(1):23043. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02033-4.
7
Tails stabilize landing of gliding geckos crashing head-first into tree trunks.尾部帮助滑翔壁虎在头部先撞向树干时稳定着陆。
Commun Biol. 2021 Sep 2;4(1):1020. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02378-6.

本文引用的文献

1
FLEXURAL STIFFNESS ALLOMETRIES OF ANGIOSPERM AND FERN PETIOLES AND RACHISES: EVIDENCE FOR BIOMECHANICAL CONVERGENCE.被子植物和蕨类植物叶柄及叶轴的弯曲刚度异速生长:生物力学趋同的证据
Evolution. 1991 May;45(3):734-750. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb04342.x.
2
MOMENTARILY EXCESSIVE CONSTRUCTION AS THE BASIS FOR PROTOADAPTATION.暂时过度构建作为原适应的基础。
Evolution. 1979 Mar;33(1Part1):227-233. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04677.x.
3
Petiole mechanics, leaf inclination, morphology, and investment in support in relation to light availability in the canopy of Liriodendron tulipifera.鹅掌楸树冠中叶柄力学、叶片倾斜度、形态以及与光照可利用性相关的支撑投入
Oecologia. 2002 Jun;132(1):21-33. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-0902-z. Epub 2002 Jun 1.
4
Sticking to the story: outstanding challenges in gecko-inspired adhesives.紧扣主题:仿壁虎粘合剂面临的突出挑战。
J Exp Biol. 2016 Apr;219(Pt 7):912-9. doi: 10.1242/jeb.080085.
5
Stress distribution and contact area measurements of a gecko toe using a high-resolution tactile sensor.使用高分辨率触觉传感器对壁虎脚趾的应力分布和接触面积进行测量。
Bioinspir Biomim. 2015 Feb 2;10(1):016013. doi: 10.1088/1748-3190/10/1/016013.
6
Adaptive simplification and the evolution of gecko locomotion: morphological and biomechanical consequences of losing adhesion.适应性简化与壁虎运动的演化:失去黏附能力的形态学和生物力学后果
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jan 20;112(3):809-14. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418979112. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
7
Systematics and natural history of Southeast Asian Rock Geckos (genus Cnemaspis Strauch, 1887) with descriptions of eight new species from Malaysia, Thailand, and Indonesia.东南亚岩蜥(Cnemaspis属,施特劳赫,1887年)的分类学与自然史,以及来自马来西亚、泰国和印度尼西亚的八个新物种的描述。
Zootaxa. 2014 Oct 31;3880:1-147. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3880.1.1.
8
Passively stuck: death does not affect gecko adhesion strength.被动黏附:死亡不影响壁虎的黏附强度。
Biol Lett. 2014 Dec;10(12):20140701. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0701.
9
A theoretical analysis of pitch stability during gliding in flying snakes.
Bioinspir Biomim. 2014 Jun;9(2):025014. doi: 10.1088/1748-3182/9/2/025014. Epub 2014 May 22.
10
Plant surfaces with cuticular folds and their replicas: influence of microstructuring and surface chemistry on the attachment of a leaf beetle.具有表皮褶皱及其复制品的植物表面:微结构和表面化学对叶甲附着的影响。
Acta Biomater. 2013 May;9(5):6360-8. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.01.030. Epub 2013 Feb 4.

蜥蜴跳到树叶上:在雨林树冠层因躲避而跳跃对壁虎的黏附极限构成挑战。

Leaping lizards landing on leaves: escape-induced jumps in the rainforest canopy challenge the adhesive limits of geckos.

作者信息

Higham Timothy E, Russell Anthony P, Niklas Karl J

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4.

出版信息

J R Soc Interface. 2017 Jun;14(131). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0156.

DOI:10.1098/rsif.2017.0156
PMID:28659411
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5493800/
Abstract

The remarkable adhesive capabilities of geckos have garnered attention from scientists and the public for centuries. Geckos are known to have an adhesive load-bearing capacity far in excess (by 100-fold or more) of that required to support their body mass or accommodate the loading imparted during maximal locomotor acceleration. Few studies, however, have investigated the ecological contexts in which geckos use their adhesive system and how this may influence its properties. Here we develop a modelling framework to assess whether their prodigious adhesive capacity ever comes under selective challenge. Our investigation is based upon observations of escape-induced aerial descents of canopy-dwelling arboreal geckos that are rapidly arrested by clinging to leaf surfaces in mid-fall. We integrate ecological observations, adhesive force measurements, and body size and shape measurements of museum specimens to conduct simulations. Using predicted bending mechanics of petioles and leaf midribs, we find that the drag coefficient of the gecko, the size of the gecko and the size of the leaf determine impact forces. Regardless of the landing surface, safety factors for geckos range from a maximum of just over 10 to a minimum of well under one, which would be the point at which the adhesive system fails. In contrast to previous research that intimates that gecko frictional adhesive capacity is excessive relative to body mass, we demonstrate that realistic conditions in nature may result in frictional capacity being pushed to its limit. The rapid arrest of the lizard from its falling velocity likely results in the maximal loading to which the adhesive system is exposed during normal activities. We suggest that such activities might be primary determinants in driving their high frictional adhesive capacity.

摘要

几个世纪以来,壁虎非凡的粘附能力一直吸引着科学家和公众的关注。众所周知,壁虎的粘附承重能力远远超过(达100倍或更多)支撑其体重或承受最大运动加速时所施加负荷所需的能力。然而,很少有研究调查壁虎使用其粘附系统的生态环境,以及这可能如何影响其性能。在这里,我们开发了一个建模框架,以评估它们惊人的粘附能力是否曾面临选择性挑战。我们的研究基于对栖息在树冠层的树栖壁虎在逃避时空中下降的观察,这些壁虎在下落过程中通过 clinging to leaf surfaces 迅速停止。我们整合了生态观察、粘附力测量以及博物馆标本的身体大小和形状测量数据来进行模拟。利用叶柄和叶片中脉的预测弯曲力学,我们发现壁虎的阻力系数、壁虎的大小和叶片的大小决定了冲击力。无论着陆表面如何,壁虎的安全系数范围从最高略超过10到最低远低于1,而安全系数为1时粘附系统就会失效。与之前暗示壁虎摩擦粘附能力相对于体重过高的研究不同,我们证明自然环境中的实际情况可能会使摩擦能力达到极限。蜥蜴从下落速度迅速停止可能会导致粘附系统在正常活动中承受最大负荷。我们认为,此类活动可能是促使它们具有高摩擦粘附能力的主要决定因素。 (注:原文中“clinging to leaf surfaces”这里的“clinging to”似乎有误,结合语境推测可能是“contacting”之类的词,但按要求未修改原文直接翻译)