• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

院外癫痫持续状态的急救反应:一项为期 10 年的观察性队列研究。

Emergency response to out-of-hospital status epilepticus: A 10-year observational cohort study.

机构信息

From the Clinic for Intensive Care Medicine (S.S., R. Spiegel, K.T., S.M., R. Sutter) and Division of Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology (S.R., R. Sutter), University Hospital Basel; and University of Basel (D.Y., R. Sutter), Switzerland.

出版信息

Neurology. 2017 Jul 25;89(4):376-384. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004147. Epub 2017 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000004147
PMID:28659426
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the implications of first responses of emergency medical services (EMS) to out-of-hospital status epilepticus (SE) on outcome.

METHODS

From 2005 to 2014, prehospital and in-hospital data were assessed in consecutive adults admitted to an academic medical center with out-of-hospital SE. Logistic regression was performed to identify variables with a robust association between missed epileptic events by the EMS and no recovery to functional baseline in survivors.

RESULTS

Among 213 SE patients, 150 were admitted via EMS. While nonconvulsive SE (NCSE) was missed by the EMS in 63.7%, convulsive SE (CSE) was not missed except in 4 patients with transformation into subtle SE. Missed NCSE was more likely with older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.10, = 0.003) and no seizure history (OR 6.64, 95% CI 2.43-18.1, < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for prediction of missed NCSE by these variables was 0.839. Independent predictors for not receiving benzodiazepines were increasing age (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.08, = 0.008) and higher Glasgow Coma Scale score (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.09-1.36, = 0.001). Missed NCSE was independently associated with increased odds for no return to functional baseline in survivors (OR 3.83, 95% CI 1.22-11.98, = 0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients admitted with out-of-hospital SE, CSE is mostly recognized while NCSE is frequently missed especially in patients with increasing age and no seizure history. This calls for heightened awareness for out-of-hospital NCSE in such patients, as missed NCSE is associated with lack of treatment and less recovery to functional baseline in survivors independent of established outcome predictors.

摘要

目的

确定急救医疗服务(EMS)对院外癫痫持续状态(SE)的首次反应对结果的影响。

方法

从 2005 年到 2014 年,对连续收治于学术医疗中心的院外 SE 成年患者的院前和院内数据进行评估。采用逻辑回归确定 EMS 漏诊癫痫事件与幸存者未恢复至功能基线之间存在稳健关联的变量。

结果

在 213 例 SE 患者中,150 例通过 EMS 入院。虽然 EMS 漏诊了 63.7%的非惊厥性 SE(NCSE),但除了 4 例转化为轻微 SE 的患者外,并未漏诊惊厥性 SE(CSE)。年长(比值比[OR] 1.06,95%置信区间[CI] 1.02-1.10, = 0.003)和无癫痫发作史(OR 6.64,95%CI 2.43-18.1, <0.001)更可能导致 NCSE 漏诊。这些变量预测 NCSE 漏诊的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.839。不接受苯二氮䓬类药物治疗的独立预测因素为年龄增加(OR 1.05,95%CI 1.01-1.08, = 0.008)和格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分较高(OR 1.21,95%CI 1.09-1.36, = 0.001)。NCSE 漏诊与幸存者无法恢复至功能基线的可能性增加独立相关(OR 3.83,95%CI 1.22-11.98, = 0.021)。

结论

在因院外 SE 入院的患者中,CSE 大多得到识别,而 NCSE 则经常漏诊,尤其是在年龄增加且无癫痫发作史的患者中。这就需要提高对这类患者院外 NCSE 的认识,因为漏诊的 NCSE 与治疗不足以及幸存者无法恢复至功能基线独立相关,而这些因素与既定的结局预测因素无关。

相似文献

1
Emergency response to out-of-hospital status epilepticus: A 10-year observational cohort study.院外癫痫持续状态的急救反应:一项为期 10 年的观察性队列研究。
Neurology. 2017 Jul 25;89(4):376-384. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004147. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
2
Functional outcome after convulsive status epilepticus.癫痫持续状态后的功能结局。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Dec;38(12):2295-303. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f859a6.
3
Predictors of outcomes and refractoriness in status epilepticus: A prospective study.癫痫持续状态的预后及难治性预测因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Oct;75:158-164. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.07.046. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
4
Distinguishing in-hospital and out-of-hospital status epilepticus: clinical implications from a 10-year cohort study.鉴别院内和院外癫痫持续状态:一项 10 年队列研究的临床意义。
Eur J Neurol. 2017 Sep;24(9):1156-1165. doi: 10.1111/ene.13359. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
5
Nonconvulsive status epilepticus after convulsive status epilepticus: Clinical features, outcomes, and prognostic factors.惊厥性癫痫持续状态后的非惊厥性癫痫持续状态:临床特征、结局及预后因素
Epilepsy Res. 2018 May;142:53-57. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
6
Third-line antiepileptic therapy and outcome in status epilepticus: the impact of vasopressor use and prolonged mechanical ventilation.三线抗癫痫治疗与癫痫持续状态的结局:血管加压素使用和长时间机械通气的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Sep;40(9):2677-84. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182591ff1.
7
Does semiology of status epilepticus have an impact on treatment response and outcome?癫痫持续状态的症状学是否会对治疗反应和预后产生影响?
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Jun;83:81-86. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.03.027. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
8
Inadequate benzodiazepine dosing may result in progression to refractory and non-convulsive status epilepticus.苯二氮䓬类药物剂量不足可能导致进展为难治性非惊厥性癫痫持续状态。
Epileptic Disord. 2018 Aug 1;20(4):265-269. doi: 10.1684/epd.2018.0987.
9
Prolonged status epilepticus: Early recognition and prediction of full recovery in a 12-year cohort.持续性癫痫状态:12 年队列中完全恢复的早期识别和预测。
Epilepsia. 2019 Jan;60(1):42-52. doi: 10.1111/epi.14603. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
10
Persistent nonconvulsive status epilepticus after the control of convulsive status epilepticus.惊厥性癫痫持续状态得到控制后的持续性非惊厥性癫痫持续状态。
Epilepsia. 1998 Aug;39(8):833-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1998.tb01177.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the feasibility of prehospital point-of-care EEG: The prehospital implementation of rapid EEG (PHIRE) study.评估院前即时脑电图的可行性:院前快速脑电图(PHIRE)研究的实施情况
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 Sep 13;5(5):e13303. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13303. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Improving Quality of Care for Status Epilepticus: Putting Protocols into Practice.提高癫痫持续状态的护理质量:将方案付诸实践。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2024 Sep;24(9):373-379. doi: 10.1007/s11910-024-01356-9. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
3
Efficacy and Tolerability of Intranasal Midazolam Administration for Antiseizure Treatment in Adults: A Systematic Review.
鼻腔内给予咪达唑仑治疗成人癫痫发作的疗效和耐受性:系统评价。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Oct;41(2):632-650. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-01971-x. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
4
Status epilepticus in the ICU.重症监护病房中的癫痫持续状态。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Jan;50(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07263-w. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
5
Prehospital Electroencephalography to Detect Traumatic Brain Injury during Helicopter Transport: A Pilot Observational Cohort Study.直升机转运中应用院前脑电检测创伤性脑损伤的前瞻性观察队列研究
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024;28(2):405-412. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2185333. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
6
Association of Peri-ictal MRI Abnormalities With Mortality, Antiseizure Medication Refractoriness, and Morbidity in Status Epilepticus.癫痫持续状态中发作间期 MRI 异常与死亡率、抗癫痫药物耐药性和发病率的相关性。
Neurology. 2023 Feb 28;100(9):e943-e953. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201599. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
7
Hyperperfusion Tmax mapping for nonconvulsive status epilepticus in the acute setting: A pilot case-control study.急性非惊厥性癫痫持续状态的超灌注 Tmax 图:一项初步病例对照研究。
Epilepsia. 2022 Oct;63(10):2534-2542. doi: 10.1111/epi.17359. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
8
Ictal, intercritical and post-ictal CT perfusion in non-convulsive status epilepticus.非惊厥性癫痫持续状态的发作期、发作间期及发作后期CT灌注成像
Neurol Sci. 2022 Nov;43(11):6575-6577. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06240-3. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
9
First-Response ABCDE Management of Status Epilepticus: A Prospective High-Fidelity Simulation Study.癫痫持续状态的初始反应ABCDE管理:一项前瞻性高保真模拟研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 15;11(2):435. doi: 10.3390/jcm11020435.
10
Seizing an Opportunity for Improvement.抓住改进的机会。
Neurology. 2022 Feb 15;98(7):287-288. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013248. Epub 2021 Dec 22.