Suppr超能文献

鼻腔内给予咪达唑仑治疗成人癫痫发作的疗效和耐受性:系统评价。

Efficacy and Tolerability of Intranasal Midazolam Administration for Antiseizure Treatment in Adults: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Neurocrit Care. 2024 Oct;41(2):632-650. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-01971-x. Epub 2024 Apr 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of intranasal midazolam (in-MDZ) administration for antiseizure treatment in adults.

METHODS

Embase and Medline literature databases were searched. We included randomized trials and cohort studies (excluding case series) of adult patients (≥ 18 years of age) examining in-MDZ administration for epilepsy, epileptic seizures, or status epilepticus published in English between 1985 and 2022. Studies were screened for eligibility based on predefined criteria. The primary outcome was the efficacy of in-MDZ administration, and the secondary outcome was its tolerability. Extracted data included study design, patient characteristics, intervention details, and outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies with 929 individuals treated with in-MDZ were included. Most studies were retrospective, with their number increasing over time. Administered in-MDZ doses ranged from 2.5 to 20 mg per single dose. The mean proportion of successful seizure termination after first in-MDZ administration was 72.7% (standard deviation [SD] 18%), and the proportion of seizure recurrence or persistent seizures ranged from 61 to 75%. Most frequent adverse reactions to in-MDZ were dizziness (mean 23.5% [SD 38.6%]), confusion (one study; 17.4%), local irritation (mean 16.6% [SD 9.6%]), and sedation (mean 12.7% [SD 9.7%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of in-MDZ seems promising for the treatment of prolonged epileptic seizures and seizure clusters in adults. Limited evidence suggests that intranasal administration is safe. Further research is warranted because of the heterogeneity of cohorts, the variation in dosages, and the lack of uniformity in defining successful seizure termination.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估鼻内咪达唑仑(in-MDZ)给药治疗成人癫痫的疗效和耐受性。

方法

检索了 Embase 和 Medline 文献数据库。我们纳入了 1985 年至 2022 年间以英语发表的关于成人患者(≥18 岁)接受 in-MDZ 治疗癫痫、癫痫发作或癫痫持续状态的随机试验和队列研究(不包括病例系列)。根据预先设定的标准筛选研究的入选标准。主要结局是 in-MDZ 给药的疗效,次要结局是其耐受性。提取的数据包括研究设计、患者特征、干预措施细节和结局。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。

结果

共纳入了 12 项研究,涉及 929 名接受 in-MDZ 治疗的患者。大多数研究为回顾性研究,且数量随时间增加。给予的 in-MDZ 剂量为单次 2.5 至 20mg。首次 in-MDZ 给药后癫痫发作终止的成功率平均为 72.7%(标准差 18%),癫痫发作复发或持续发作的比例为 61%至 75%。in-MDZ 最常见的不良反应为头晕(平均 23.5%[标准差 38.6%])、意识模糊(一项研究;17.4%)、局部刺激(平均 16.6%[标准差 9.6%])和镇静(平均 12.7%[标准差 9.7%])。

结论

in-MDZ 给药似乎有望治疗成人持续性癫痫发作和癫痫发作群。有限的证据表明鼻内给药是安全的。由于队列的异质性、剂量的变化以及成功终止癫痫发作定义的不一致,需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df43/11377482/85ffca0495e0/12028_2024_1971_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验