Darvell B W, Spratley M H
Aust Dent J. 1979 Feb;24(1):48-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1979.tb03597.x.
The accuracy and precision of certain external cephalometric measurements were investigated on a subject presenting optimal conditions, using ten operators. Due to difficulties in identifying landmarks and tissue compressibility, the standard deviation of a measurement for ten replications ranged from 0 . 3 to 1 . 7 mm, while the "between operators" standard deviation was no better than 2 . 0 mm. Measurement accuracy was also poor: that of primary interest, subnasale-gnathion, had a bias of the order of 7 mm, judged by a radiographic determination. A minimum denture success rate of 97% is equated with a standard deviation of 1 mm in the design freeway space. A recently published regression equation for predicting occlusal vertical dimension has a minimum error of prediction of 5 . 8 mm and thus is considered an inadequate predictive tool. The errors demonstrated in facial measurements suggest that using formulae to predict occlusal vertical dimension is unlikely to produce clinically acceptable results.
使用十名操作人员,对一名具备最佳条件的受试者进行了某些头颅侧位测量的准确性和精密度研究。由于识别标志点存在困难以及组织的可压缩性,十次重复测量的标准差范围为0.3至1.7毫米,而“操作人员之间”的标准差不优于2.0毫米。测量准确性也很差:主要关注的鼻下点-颏下点测量,通过放射学测定判断,偏差约为7毫米。在无牙颌间隙设计中,假牙最低成功率97%等同于标准差1毫米。最近发表的用于预测咬合垂直距离的回归方程,其最小预测误差为5.8毫米,因此被认为是一种不充分的预测工具。面部测量中显示的误差表明,使用公式预测咬合垂直距离不太可能产生临床上可接受的结果。