Suppr超能文献

口服紧急避孕药后快速启动激素避孕:一项系统评价

Quick starting hormonal contraception after using oral emergency contraception: a systematic review.

作者信息

Murphy Lauren Ee, Chen Zhong E, Warner Valerie, Cameron Sharon T

机构信息

Department of Reproductive and Developmental Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

出版信息

J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2017 Oct;43(4):319-326. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2017-101740. Epub 2017 Jun 29.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Unprotected intercourse after oral emergency contraception (EC) significantly increases pregnancy risk. This underlies the importance of promptly starting effective, ongoing contraception - known as 'quick starting'. However, theoretical concern exists that quick starting might interact with EC or hormonal contraception (HC) potentially causing adverse side effects.

METHOD

A systematic review was conducted, evaluating quick starting HC after oral EC [levonorgestrel 1.5 mg (LNG) or ulipristal acetate 30 mg (UPA)]. PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov and relevant reference lists were searched in February 2016. A lack of comparable studies prevented meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Three randomised controlled trials were identified. Two biomedical studies suggested HC action was unaffected by quick starting after UPA; one study examined ovarian quiescence (OR 1.27; 95% CI 0.51-3.18) while taking combined oral contraception (COC). Another assessed cervical mucus impenetrability (OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.27-2.13) while taking progestogen-only pills (POP). Quick starting POP reduced the ability of UPA to delay ovulation (OR 0.04; 95% CI 0.01-0.37). Side effects (OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.48-3.12) and unscheduled bleeding (OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.16-1.81) were unaffected by quick starting COC after UPA. Another study reported higher self-reported contraceptive use at 8 weeks among women quick starting POP after LNG, compared with women given LNG alone (OR 6.73; 95% CI 2.14-21.20).

摘要

引言

口服紧急避孕药(EC)后进行无保护性交会显著增加怀孕风险。这凸显了立即开始有效、持续避孕(即“快速启动”)的重要性。然而,理论上存在担忧,即快速启动可能会与紧急避孕药或激素避孕(HC)相互作用,从而可能导致不良副作用。

方法

进行了一项系统评价,评估口服紧急避孕药(左炔诺孕酮1.5毫克[LNG]或醋酸乌利司他30毫克[UPA])后快速启动激素避孕的情况。2016年2月检索了PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、ICTRP、ClinicalTrials.gov及相关参考文献列表。由于缺乏可比研究,无法进行荟萃分析。

结果

共确定了三项随机对照试验。两项生物医学研究表明,UPA后快速启动激素避孕对激素避孕效果无影响;一项研究在服用复方口服避孕药(COC)时检测了卵巢静止情况(比值比1.27;95%置信区间0.51 - 3.18)。另一项研究在服用仅含孕激素的避孕药(POP)时评估了宫颈黏液的不可穿透性(比值比0.76;95%置信区间0.27 - 2.13)。快速启动POP会降低UPA延迟排卵的能力(比值比0.04;95%置信区间0.01 - 0.37)。UPA后快速启动COC对副作用(比值比1.22;95%置信区间0.48 - 3.12)和不规则出血(比值比0.53;95%置信区间0.16 - 1.81)无影响。另一项研究报告称,与仅接受LNG的女性相比,LNG后快速启动POP的女性在8周时自我报告的避孕措施使用率更高(比值比6.73;95%置信区间2.14 - 21.20)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验