• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[德国联邦高级当局与伦理委员会关于实施欧盟临床试验法规的联合试点项目]

[Joint pilot project of the German higher federal authorities and ethics committees on implementing the EU Regulation on clinical trials].

作者信息

Sudhop Thomas, Grass Guido, Wessler Ignaz

机构信息

Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte (BfArM), Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Deutschland.

Geschäftsstelle der Ethikkommission, Medizinische Fakultät der Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2017 Aug;60(8):817-825. doi: 10.1007/s00103-017-2584-z.

DOI:10.1007/s00103-017-2584-z
PMID:28664274
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The European Clinical Trials Regulation 536/2014 and the corresponding national legal transitions will require close cooperation between the federal higher authorities and ethics committees in the assessment of clinical trial applications involving medicinal products in humans. In preparation for this, a pilot project was launched to simulate the future processes of the regulation in line with current legal requirements and in order to give applicants, authorities and ethics committees the opportunity to familiarise themselves with the new procedures.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this paper is to examine all pilot project procedures of the first year since starting the pilot project at the end of 2015.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All 20 pilot projects completed in the first year were analysed for adherence to deadlines and results of the assessments.

RESULTS

Within the time limits specified in the EU regulation, 17 of 20 procedures were fully completed. In two cases, the sponsors slightly exceeded the additional delivery period. In one case, the sponsor withdrew the application within the pilot procedure. All 20 applications were processed jointly by the federal authorities and ethics committees, and in all cases a coordinated assessment report was successfully compiled on time. All 20 applications were approved, five of which were subject to suspensive conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Compliance with the deadlines set by federal authorities and ethics committee shows that the technical infrastructures and processes established in the pilot procedure are fully functional. The cooperation between the federal higher authorities and ethics committees was very successful from the perspective of the parties involved.

摘要

背景

《欧洲临床试验法规(536/2014)》及相应的国家法律过渡要求联邦高级当局与伦理委员会在评估涉及人类药品的临床试验申请时密切合作。为此,启动了一个试点项目,以根据当前法律要求模拟该法规未来的流程,以便让申请人、当局和伦理委员会有机会熟悉新程序。

目的

本文旨在研究自2015年底启动试点项目以来第一年的所有试点项目程序。

材料与方法

对第一年完成的所有20个试点项目进行分析,以检查其是否遵守期限以及评估结果。

结果

在欧盟法规规定的期限内,20个程序中的17个已全部完成。有两个案例中,申办方略微超出了额外交付期。在一个案例中,申办方在试点程序中撤回了申请。所有20份申请均由联邦当局和伦理委员会联合处理,并且在所有案例中都按时成功编制了协调评估报告。所有20份申请均获批准,其中5份附有暂停条件。

结论

遵守联邦当局和伦理委员会设定的期限表明,试点程序中建立的技术基础设施和流程功能齐全。从相关各方的角度来看,联邦高级当局与伦理委员会之间的合作非常成功。

相似文献

1
[Joint pilot project of the German higher federal authorities and ethics committees on implementing the EU Regulation on clinical trials].[德国联邦高级当局与伦理委员会关于实施欧盟临床试验法规的联合试点项目]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2017 Aug;60(8):817-825. doi: 10.1007/s00103-017-2584-z.
2
[The impact of the EU Regulation 536/2014 on the tasks and functioning of ethics committees in Germany].[欧盟第536/2014号条例对德国伦理委员会任务及运作的影响]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2017 Aug;60(8):830-835. doi: 10.1007/s00103-017-2580-3.
3
[Implementation status of Regulation EU 536/2014 in the member states].[欧盟第536/2014号法规在各成员国的实施情况]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2017 Aug;60(8):836-840. doi: 10.1007/s00103-017-2579-9.
4
[Changes in the German Medicinal Product Act imposed by the EU regulation on clinical trials].[欧盟临床试验法规对德国药品法的修订]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2017 Aug;60(8):804-811. doi: 10.1007/s00103-017-2574-1.
5
[Evaluation of clinical trials on medicinal products by ethics committees: changes due to the new EU Regulation 536/2014 (CTR) and necessary harmonization measures].[伦理委员会对医药产品临床试验的评估:因欧盟新法规536/2014(临床试验管理条例)导致的变化及必要的协调措施]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 Jan;66(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03627-7. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
6
[The national legislation accompanying the approval procedure for clinical trials of medicinal products for human use under Regulation (EU) No. 536/2014].[2014年第536号(欧盟)法规下人类用药品临床试验批准程序所配套的国家立法]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 Jan;66(1):12-20. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03629-5. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
7
[Reorganization of the procedures and the tasks of the responsible ethics committees after the 12th AMG amendment. Concepts of the permanent working group of the medical ethics committees in Germany].[第12次《社会法典》第五编修订后负责伦理委员会的程序与任务重组。德国医学伦理委员会常设工作组的概念]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2005 Feb;48(2):155-67. doi: 10.1007/s00103-004-0981-6.
8
[Principles of the EU Clinical Trials Regulation No 536/2014 : What will change?].[欧盟第536/2014号临床试验法规原则:将会有哪些变化?]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2017 Aug;60(8):795-803. doi: 10.1007/s00103-017-2575-0.
9
[Recording and reporting adverse reactions in clinical trials. New legal provisions according to the 12th Law Amending the German Drug Law (AMG) and the Ordinance on GCP (GCP-V)].[临床试验中的不良反应记录与报告。依据修订德国药品法(AMG)的第12条法律及药物临床试验质量管理规范(GCP)条例的新法律规定]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2005 Feb;48(2):173-80. doi: 10.1007/s00103-004-0986-1.
10
Evaluation of clinical trials by Ethics Committees in Germany: experience of applicants with the review of requests for opinion of the Ethics Committees - results of a survey among members of the German Association of Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies (VFA).德国伦理委员会对临床试验的评估:申请人在伦理委员会意见审查方面的经验——德国研发型制药企业协会(VFA)成员的调查结果
Ger Med Sci. 2009 Jul 16;7:Doc07. doi: 10.3205/000066.