Kruse Andreas, Kuhlmey Adelheid, Naegele Gerhard
Institut für Gerontologie, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität, Bergheimer Str. 20, 69115, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Institut für Medizinische Soziologie und Rehabilitationswissenschaft, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 Jul;50(5):420-428. doi: 10.1007/s00391-017-1268-5. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
In the first part of this article a comprehensive understanding of political advice is explicated. In this context reference is made to the value judgement dispute in German sociology and a differentiation between an enlightening and a critical function of scientific policy advice. Development of social scientific policy advice is considered against the background of the distinction between technocratic, decisionistic and pragmatic models of counseling. In the second part of the article, the committee of inquiry on demographic change, the national reports on aging and the reviews on the development of the healthcare system are considered as practical examples of policy advice.
在本文的第一部分,对政治建议进行了全面的阐释。在此背景下,提及了德国社会学中的价值判断争议以及科学政策建议的启蒙功能与批判功能之间的区别。社会科学政策建议的发展是在技术官僚、决策主义和务实咨询模式区分的背景下进行考量的。在本文的第二部分,人口变化调查委员会、国家老龄化报告以及医疗保健系统发展综述被视为政策建议的实际例子。